Guided Implant Surgery: Evolution, Accuracy, and Clinical Relevance


Authors : Dr. Sakshi Kadu; Dr. Meenakshi Khandelwal; Dr. Niraj Yadav

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mteeuxk5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4y7v2p4y

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct760

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The advent of surgical guides has revolutionized implantology by enhancing the precision, safety, and predictability of implant placement. Surgical guides act as a crucial link between digital planning and clinical execution, translating virtual implant positioning into an accurate intraoral reality. With advancements in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies, various types of guides—conventional, partially guided, and fully guided—have been developed to cater to different clinical needs. These guides assist in achieving optimal three-dimensional implant positioning, ensuring ideal prosthetic outcomes, and minimizing intraoperative complications. Moreover, the integration of 3D printing and digital workflows has significantly reduced fabrication time and improved customization. Despite their numerous advantages, limitations such as technique sensitivity, cost, and potential deviations during clinical transfer still exist. Continuous innovations in digital design software, navigation systems, and material science are expected to further refine the accuracy and clinical applicability of surgical guides. This article reviews the evolution, classification, fabrication techniques, advantages, limitations, and future perspectives of surgical guides in implant dentistry.

Keywords : Surgical Guide, Implantology, Digital Dentistry, Guided Implant Surgery, CAD/CAM, 3D Printing.

References :

  1. Abd El Salam El Askary. (2003). Reconstructive Aesthetic Implant Surgery. Vol. 2. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Munksgaard. 33-34
  2. Akça, K., Iplikçioglu, H., & Cehreli, M. C. (2002). A surgical guide for accurate mesiodistal paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 87:233-235.
  3. Orentlicher, G., & Abboud, M. (2011). Guided surgery for implant therapy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 23:239-56.
  4. Ferro, K. J., Morgano, S. M., Driscoll, C. F., Freilich, M. A., Guckes, A. D., & Knoernschild, K. L. (2017). The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent, 117(5S), e1-e105.
  5. Drill guides for every case scenario: Surgi Guide Cookbook.       Available               from: http://www.materialisedental.com/materialise/vie w/en/2395185.SurgiGuide+dental+drill+guide+Co okbo ok.html. [Last cited on 2013 Aug 25].
  6. Abd El Salam El Askary. (2003). Reconstructive Aesthetic Implant Surgery. Vol. 2. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Munksgaard. 33-34.
  7. Fortin, T., Champleboux, G., Lormée, J., & Coudert, J. L. (2000). Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides inconjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol. 26:300‑303.
  8. Martins, R. J., & Lederman, H. M. (2013). Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bonegraft. Acta Cir Bras. 28:683-690.
  9. Huh, Y. J., Choi, B. R., Huh, K. H., Yi, W. J., Heo, M. S., Lee, S. S., & Choi, S. C. (2012). In-vitro study on the accuracy of a simple-design CT- guided stent for dental implants. Imaging science in dentistry, 42(3), 139-146.
  10. Khanna, Dr & Munde, Dr & Baisane, Dr & Shujaulla, Dr & Tabasum, Dr & Mohammed, Shammas. (2020). Surgical Guides in Implants: A Review. Saudi Journal of Oral and Dental Research.5.425-430. 10.36348/sjodr.2020.v05i09.001.
  11. Lal, K., White, G. S., Morea, D. N., & Wright, R. F. (2006). Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and     placement. Part II. A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 15:117‑22.
  12. Moslehifard, E., & Nokar, S. (2012). Designing a custom made gauge device for application in the access hole correction in the dental implant surgical guide. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 12:123- 129.
  13. Implants retrieved from patients with and without osteoporosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:321–327.
  14. Slagter, K. W., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A. (2008). Osteoporosis and edentulous jaws. Int J Prosthodont. 21:19–26.
  15. Kido, H., Schulz, E. E., Kakura, K., Yamamoto, K., Morinaga, K., & Matsuura, M. (2011). Human mandibular trabecular bone density correlation with mechanical strength: implications for implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry, 20(4), 323-326.
  16. Amorim, M. A., Takayama, L., Jorgetti, V., & Pereira, R. M. (2007). Comparative study of axial and femoral bone mineral density and parameters of mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants. Osteoporos Int. 18:703–709.
  17. Friberg, B., Ekestubbe, A., Mellstro¨m, D., & Sennerby, L. (2001). Bra˚nemark implants and osteoporosis: a clinical exploratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 3:50–56.
  18. Shi, Y., Wang, J., Ma, C. et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. Int J Implant Dent 9, 38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00507- w
  19. Madrid, C., & Sanz, M. (2009). What impact do systemically administrated bisphosphonates have on oral implant therapy? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. (suppl 4):87–95.
  20. Pazianas, M., Miller, P., Blumentals, W. A., Bernal, M., & Kothawala, P. (2007). A review of the literature on osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis treated with oral bisphosphonates: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics. Clin Ther. 29:1548–1558.
  21. Gómez, F. R., Martínez, G. M., & Olmos, M. J. (2008). Osteochemonecrosis of the jaws due to bisphosphonate treatments. Update. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 13(5), E318-324.
  22. Woo, S. B., Hellstein, J. W., & Kalmar, J. R. (2006). Narrative [corrected] review: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws. Ann Intern Med. 144:753–761.
  23. Fugazzotto, P. A., Lightfoot, W. S., Jaffin, R., & Kumar, A. (2007). Implant placement with or without simultaneous tooth extraction in patients taking oral bisphosphonates: postoperative healing, early follow‐up, and the incidence of complications in two private practices. Journal of periodontology, 78(9), 1664-1669.
  24. Marx, R. E. (2007). Oral and Intravenous Bisphosphonate-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaws  Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment. 1st ed. Hanover Park, Ill: Quintessence.
  25. Starck, W. J., & Epker, B. N. (1995). Failure of osseointegrated dental implants after diphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 10:74-78.
  26. Jeffcoat, M. K. (2006). Safety of oral bisphosphonates: controlled studies on alveolar bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21:349–353.
  27. Wang, H. L., Weber, D., & McCauley, L. K. (2007). Effect of long-term oral bisphosphonates on implant wound healing: literature review and a casereport. J Periodontol. 78:584–594.
  28. Yuan, K., Chen, K. C., Chan, Y. J., Tsai, C. C., Chen, H. H., & Shih, C. C. (2012). Dental implant failure associated with bacterial infection and long-term bisphosphonate usage: a case report. Implant dentistry, 21(1), 3-7.

The advent of surgical guides has revolutionized implantology by enhancing the precision, safety, and predictability of implant placement. Surgical guides act as a crucial link between digital planning and clinical execution, translating virtual implant positioning into an accurate intraoral reality. With advancements in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies, various types of guides—conventional, partially guided, and fully guided—have been developed to cater to different clinical needs. These guides assist in achieving optimal three-dimensional implant positioning, ensuring ideal prosthetic outcomes, and minimizing intraoperative complications. Moreover, the integration of 3D printing and digital workflows has significantly reduced fabrication time and improved customization. Despite their numerous advantages, limitations such as technique sensitivity, cost, and potential deviations during clinical transfer still exist. Continuous innovations in digital design software, navigation systems, and material science are expected to further refine the accuracy and clinical applicability of surgical guides. This article reviews the evolution, classification, fabrication techniques, advantages, limitations, and future perspectives of surgical guides in implant dentistry.

Keywords : Surgical Guide, Implantology, Digital Dentistry, Guided Implant Surgery, CAD/CAM, 3D Printing.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe