Authors :
Alan C Dominic
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5e8bdhya
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4dkn7uc8
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV951
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Vandalism is the intentional destruction of
public or private property, possessing a significant threat
to heritage monuments. In Kerala, historical sites
frequently suffer from acts such as scribbling, defacement
and unscientific restoration, diminishing their aesthetic,
historic and cultural significance. Beyond the physical
damage, vandalism impacts cultural identity, community
pride, and the socio-economic landscape by eroding the
sense of this shared heritage. This paper explores the
psychological and sociological reasons behind vandalism
in built heritage, on the basis of survey conducted on the
built heritage sites of Kerala. It also presents potential
remedies, focusing on education, legislation, and
community involvement to limit this destructive
behaviour.
Keywords :
Vandalism, Heritage Conservation, Built Heritage, Kerala, Psychology, Sociological Impact, Cultural Identity.
References :
- Becker, E. 1973. The denial of death, New York, The Free Press.
- Chalfant, H. 1992. No One is in Control, In H. H. Christensen, D. J. Johnson, & M. H. Brookes (Eds.), Vandalism: Research, prevention, and social policy. Seattle: US Dept. of Agriculture / Pacific Northwest Research Station and University of Washington.
- Goldstein, A.P. 1996. The Psychology of Vandalism. 1st ed. Dymocks, Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature Customer Service Centre LLC.
- Higgins, H.C. 1992. Rock Art Vandalism: Causes and Prevention. In H. H. Christensen, D. J. Johnson, & M. H. Brookes (Eds.), Vandalism: Research, prevention, and social policy. Seattle: US Dept. of Agriculture / Pacific Northwest Research Station and University of Washington.
- Merrills, A. 2009. The Origins of ‘Vandalism’. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 16(2).
- Monto, M.A. 2003. The social construction of masculinity: a study of graffiti writers. Journal of Men's Studies.
- Monto, M.A., Anderson, T.L. and Machalek, J. 2013. Boys doing art: the construction of outlaw masculinity in a Portland, Oregon, graffiti crew. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 42(3), pp.259–290.
- Namba, R. and Dustin, D. 1992. Towards New Definitions of Depreciative Behaviour and Vandalism. In H. H. Christensen, D. J. Johnson, & M. H. Brookes (Eds.), Vandalism: Research, prevention, and social policy. Seattle: US Dept. of Agriculture / Pacific Northwest Research Station and University of Washington.
- Patil, C.B. 2019. Protection of Cultural Heritage in Indian (With Special Reference to Illicit Trafficking) Problems and Prospects. In: Joint Conference: 52th IAS, 47th ISPQS, and 43th of History and Cultural Society. J P Joshi Memorial Lecture. Bengaluru: Archaeological Survey of India.
Vandalism is the intentional destruction of
public or private property, possessing a significant threat
to heritage monuments. In Kerala, historical sites
frequently suffer from acts such as scribbling, defacement
and unscientific restoration, diminishing their aesthetic,
historic and cultural significance. Beyond the physical
damage, vandalism impacts cultural identity, community
pride, and the socio-economic landscape by eroding the
sense of this shared heritage. This paper explores the
psychological and sociological reasons behind vandalism
in built heritage, on the basis of survey conducted on the
built heritage sites of Kerala. It also presents potential
remedies, focusing on education, legislation, and
community involvement to limit this destructive
behaviour.
Keywords :
Vandalism, Heritage Conservation, Built Heritage, Kerala, Psychology, Sociological Impact, Cultural Identity.