⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



How Intrinsic Motivation is Affected by Extrinsic Motivators in Colleges: A Mixed-Methods Study


Authors : Rushabh Shende; Jatin Shrivastav

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3rmnd558

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1383

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examines how extrinsic motivators — including grades, monetary incentives, scholarships, and institutional rewards — influence intrinsic motivation among college students, drawing on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as its theoretical foundation. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, primary data were collected from 412 undergraduate students across five colleges via a validated Likert-scale survey (Academic Motivation Scale, adapted), supplemented by 28 semi-structured interviews. Secondary data were drawn from institutional academic records and 34 peer-reviewed sources published between 2015 and 2026. Quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression revealed a statistically significant negative association between the salience of extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation (r = -0.41, p < 0.001), consistent with the overjustification effect. Students exposed to high-stakes monetary incentives reported the lowest intrinsic motivation scores (M = 3.12, SD = 0.81), while those in reward-free or autonomy-supportive conditions reported the highest (M = 4.21, SD = 0.62). Thematic analysis of interview data corroborated these findings, identifying five recurring themes: reduced autonomy, a shift in focus toward grades, diminished curiosity, short-term effort gains, and long-term disengagement. The study concludes that controlling forms of extrinsic motivation undermine intrinsic motivation, whereas informational and autonomy-supportive incentives have a comparatively neutral or even complementary effect. Implications for pedagogical design, grading policy, and student engagement strategy in higher education are discussed.

Keywords : Intrinsic Motivation; Extrinsic Rewards; Self-Determination Theory; Over Justification Effect; Higher Education; Student Engagement; Mixed-Methods Research.

References :

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77‑01.
  2. Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1‑44.
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
  5. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1‑27.
  6. Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321–336.
  7. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161.
  8. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the overjustification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.
  9. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
  10. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017.
  11. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671–688.

This study examines how extrinsic motivators — including grades, monetary incentives, scholarships, and institutional rewards — influence intrinsic motivation among college students, drawing on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as its theoretical foundation. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, primary data were collected from 412 undergraduate students across five colleges via a validated Likert-scale survey (Academic Motivation Scale, adapted), supplemented by 28 semi-structured interviews. Secondary data were drawn from institutional academic records and 34 peer-reviewed sources published between 2015 and 2026. Quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression revealed a statistically significant negative association between the salience of extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation (r = -0.41, p < 0.001), consistent with the overjustification effect. Students exposed to high-stakes monetary incentives reported the lowest intrinsic motivation scores (M = 3.12, SD = 0.81), while those in reward-free or autonomy-supportive conditions reported the highest (M = 4.21, SD = 0.62). Thematic analysis of interview data corroborated these findings, identifying five recurring themes: reduced autonomy, a shift in focus toward grades, diminished curiosity, short-term effort gains, and long-term disengagement. The study concludes that controlling forms of extrinsic motivation undermine intrinsic motivation, whereas informational and autonomy-supportive incentives have a comparatively neutral or even complementary effect. Implications for pedagogical design, grading policy, and student engagement strategy in higher education are discussed.

Keywords : Intrinsic Motivation; Extrinsic Rewards; Self-Determination Theory; Over Justification Effect; Higher Education; Student Engagement; Mixed-Methods Research.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - September - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe