Human Health Risks of Heavy Metal Exposure from Eight Popular Cultured Fish Species in Jashore, Bangladesh


Authors : Ahasan Habib; Md. Shazzad Hossain; Pulakesh Basak; Md. Moklesur Rahman; Most. Rabeya Sultana Setu; Mridul Kanti Das; Rezaul Karim; S. M. Shamiul Alam

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/nhjecnep

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5n6mm9mr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14928738


Abstract : The current study sought to determine the levels of seven heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium, arsenic, copper, nickel, and mercury—and the possible health concerns to humans in eight common cultured fish species from Monirampur Upazila, Jashore, Bangladesh. This study employed a completely randomized laboratory experimental design with three replications. Using ICP-MS technology, the experiment was carried out from May to July 2024 at Jashore University of Science and Technology's Centre for Sophisticated Instrumentation and Research Laboratory (CSIRL). Five percent of daily calories are obtained from fish. Eight common cultured freshwater fishes—Pangas, Pangasius pangasius; Tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus; Rui, Labeo rohita; Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix; Mrigal, Cirrhinus cirrhosis; Catla, Catla catla; Koi, Anabas testudineus; and Kalibaus, Labeo calbasu—were gathered from a commercial fish farm in Monirampur Upazila, Jashore, Bangladesh in order to measure the metal levels in the edible portion (flesh) and evaluate the risk to human health. Copper and arsenic were below detection limits, but the following amounts were measured: cadmium (0.1365-0.2235 mg/kg), lead (1.225 mg/kg), chromium (1.435 mg/kg), mercury (0.202-3.105 mg/kg), and nickel (1.09 mg/kg). Mercury from Pangasius pangasius may present non-carcinogenic concerns, even if the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) values for individual metals (apart from mercury) were less than 1, suggesting no substantial health risk. Additionally, the Target Carcinogenic Risk (TRs) for chromium and nickel surpassed acceptable limits, suggesting chronic exposure to these metals may result in both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effects.

Keywords : Heavy metals, Human Health Risks, Cultured Fish Species, Mercury Contamination, Target Hazard Quotient (THQ).

References :

  1. Chowdhury, K. R., Hossain, M. S., & Khan, M. S. H. (2022). Bangladesh geosciences and resources potential. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003080817.
  2. Department of Fisheries (DoF). (2023). Fish production data for Bangladesh, fiscal year 2022–2023. Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh.
  3. Bangladesh Economic Review (BER). (2023). Fisheries sector contributions to GDP and agriculture, fiscal year 2022–2023. Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh.
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2022). Fish's contribution to the Bangladeshi diet. Rome: FAO.
  5. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). (2023). Report on the average daily fish protein intake per capita in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning, Government of Bangladesh.
  6. Bhuyan, M. S., Sharif, A. S. M., Islam, M. M., Mojumder, I. A., Das, M., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Blue economy and the prospect of seaweed in Bangladesh. Journal of Marine Science Research and Oceanography, 3(1-2).
  7. Rakib, M. R. J., Sarker, A., Ram, K., Uddin, M. G., Walker, T. R., Chowdhury, T., Uddin, J., Khandaker, M. U., Rahman, M. M., & Idris, A. M. (2023). Microplastic toxicity in aquatic organisms and aquatic ecosystems: A review. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 234(52). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06062-9.
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Health risks associated with heavy metal contamination in fish. Geneva: WHO Press.
  9. Isangedighi, A. I., & Gift, S. D. (2019). Heavy metals contamination in fish: Effects on human health. Journal of Aquatic Science and Marine Biology, 2(4), 7–12.
  10. Yimthiang, S., Pouyfung, P., Khamphaya, T., Kuraeiad, S., Wongrith, P., Vesey, D. A., Gobe, G. C., & Satarug, S. (2022). Effects of environmental exposure to cadmium and lead on the risks of diabetes and kidney dysfunction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042259
  11. Akter, S., Hasan, M. N., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Heavy metal concentrations in wild and cultured fish species: Health risk assessment and implications for food safety. Bangladesh Journal of Zoology, 49(2), 123–135.
  12. Hossain, M. M., Sarker, S., & Akhter, N. (2022). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in commonly consumed fish species from the Lower Meghna River: A human health perspective. Toxics, 10(3), 139. https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/3/139
  13. AOAC International. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.
  14. Jiang, H., Qin, D., Chen, Z., Tang, S., Bai, S., & Mou, Z. (2016). Heavy metal levels in fish from Heilongjiang River and potential health risk assessment. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 97(5), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1894-4
  15. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). (2011). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2010. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
  16. USEPA. (2000). Guidance for assessing chemical contaminant data for use in fish advisories, Volume II: Risk assessment and fish consumption limits (EPA 823-B00-008). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov
  17. Chien, L. C., Hung, T. C., Choang, K. Y., Yeh, C., Meng, P. J., Shieh, M. J., & Han, B. C. (2002). Daily intake of TBT, Cu, Zn, Cd, and As for fishermen in Taiwan. Science of The Total Environment, 285(1-3), 177–185.
  18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2019). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/iris
  19. Yi, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhang, S. (2017). Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fish from the Yangtze River basin. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2575-2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.011
  20. Wang, X. L., Sato, T., Xing, B. S., & Tao, S. (2005). Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Science of the Total Environment, 350(1-3), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.044
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2011). Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) - Generic Tables. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables
  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2019). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/iris
  23. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). (2020). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2019. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.
  24. Hassan, M., Rahman, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Health risk assessment of heavy metals in fish and vegetables from a freshwater river in Bangladesh. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 26(7), 1686-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1628870
  25. Nevárez, M., García-Rico, L., & Jara-Marini, M. E. (2020). Risk assessment of heavy metals in fish from the Gulf of California. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8050-5
  26. Ullah, A. K. M. A., Maksud, M. A., Khan, S. R., & Lutfa, L. N. (2017). Concentrations of toxic metals in different fish species and assessment of the health risks in Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6162-3
  27. Garcia-Leston, J., Roma-Torres, J., & Mayan, O. (2022). Lead exposure and its impact on human health. Environmental Research, 204, 112021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112021
  28. Eisler, R. (2021). Copper hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A synoptic review. Biological Science Report, 33, 1-98. https://doi.org/10.3133/bsr33
  29. Ahmed, M. K., Baki, M. A., Islam, M. S., Kundu, G. K., Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M., Sarkar, S. K., & Hossain, M. M. (2023). Human health risks from heavy metals in fish of Buriganga river, Bangladesh. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-1
  30. Auttman, N., Satarug, S., & Na-Bangchang, K. (2022). Health risk assessment of mercury exposure in fish-consuming populations. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 90, 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2022.103770
  31. National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council (NATS-NRC). (2021). Nickel in the environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  32. Saha, J. C., Dikshit, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, M., & Saha, K. C. (2020). A review of arsenic poisoning and its effects on human health. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 34(3), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380490474164
  33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2011). Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) - Generic Tables. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables
  34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2023). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessments. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/iris
  35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2010). Risk-based concentration table. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables

The current study sought to determine the levels of seven heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium, arsenic, copper, nickel, and mercury—and the possible health concerns to humans in eight common cultured fish species from Monirampur Upazila, Jashore, Bangladesh. This study employed a completely randomized laboratory experimental design with three replications. Using ICP-MS technology, the experiment was carried out from May to July 2024 at Jashore University of Science and Technology's Centre for Sophisticated Instrumentation and Research Laboratory (CSIRL). Five percent of daily calories are obtained from fish. Eight common cultured freshwater fishes—Pangas, Pangasius pangasius; Tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus; Rui, Labeo rohita; Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix; Mrigal, Cirrhinus cirrhosis; Catla, Catla catla; Koi, Anabas testudineus; and Kalibaus, Labeo calbasu—were gathered from a commercial fish farm in Monirampur Upazila, Jashore, Bangladesh in order to measure the metal levels in the edible portion (flesh) and evaluate the risk to human health. Copper and arsenic were below detection limits, but the following amounts were measured: cadmium (0.1365-0.2235 mg/kg), lead (1.225 mg/kg), chromium (1.435 mg/kg), mercury (0.202-3.105 mg/kg), and nickel (1.09 mg/kg). Mercury from Pangasius pangasius may present non-carcinogenic concerns, even if the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) values for individual metals (apart from mercury) were less than 1, suggesting no substantial health risk. Additionally, the Target Carcinogenic Risk (TRs) for chromium and nickel surpassed acceptable limits, suggesting chronic exposure to these metals may result in both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effects.

Keywords : Heavy metals, Human Health Risks, Cultured Fish Species, Mercury Contamination, Target Hazard Quotient (THQ).

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe