Human Resource Management in the Digital Era and Competitive Advantage Factor Affecting on Business Performance in Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR


Authors : Anousone Thipduangchai; Thongvanh Sirivanh

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yw76rv63

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3evywbwy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1814

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : Human resource management is a key area in the digital age, firstly in business. It is central to a business strategy, facilitates the attainment of competitive advantage and improves business performance. This research sought to examine the role of certain factors that affect competitive advantage, test these factors through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and construct a model depicting the interrelationships between business performance in Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR. This research used quantitative research methods only. Data were obtained from a sample size of 256 SMEs in Vientiane Capital and were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling for hypothesis testing. The research findings from testing the hypotheses shows that the Human Resource Management factors in this era of digitalization greatly impacts on competitive, with the t-value = 9.86, influence coefficient β=0.87, and P-value < 0.001, likewise, the factors of competitive advantage have a positive impact on firm performance in the case of Vientiane Capital, the hypothesis is accepted at the t-value of 2.1, influence β=0.36 and P-value <0.05, In addition, human resources management factors in this digital era also significantly impact the business performance in Vientiane Capital, the evidence for this is that t-Value is 2.88 with an influence coefficient β=0.54 and P-value <0.05. Further, with respect to business performance the SEM model has the following values: (χ2/df)= 1.78; GFI=0.97; AGFI=0.93; CFI=0.99; RMSEA=0.05. Both factors account for business performance variance at R2=0.76. The findings of the research underline the importance of Human Resource Management in the development of firm’s competitive advantage and efficiency of business activity in rudimentary states regulating them within age. The evidence indicates that firms in Vientiane Capital should place more emphasis on their HRM practices in order to achieve greater competitive advantage and improved performance.

Keywords : Cost Strategy; Customer Value; Digital Human Resource Management; Learning and Growth; Vientiane Capital; Lao PDR.

References :

  1. Achar, S., Vijayendra, K., Hussain, S., Kejriwal, A., & Kejriwal, A. (2022). Business Trends in Digital Era: A Review. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports23(12), 328-338.

https://doi.org/  10.9734/JERR/2022/v23i12788

  1. Alderson, W. (1937). A marketing view of competition. Journal of Marketing1(3), 189-190.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002224293700100302

  1. AlHamad, A., Alshurideh, M., Alomari, K., Kurdi, B., Alzoubi, H., Hamouche, S., & Al-Hawary, S.(2022). The effect of electronic human resources management on organizational health of telecommuni-cations companies in Jordan. International Journal of Data and Network Science6(2), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.12.011
  2. Alqarni, K., Agina, M. F., Khairy, H. A., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Farrag, D. A., & Abdallah, R. M. (2023).The effect of electronic human resource management systems on sustainable competitive advantages: the roles of sustainable innovation and organizational agility. Sustainability15(23), 16382.

https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su152316382

  1. Amalia, M. R. (2024). The Impact of Digital Era 4.0 Transformation on Human Resources Management. Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY)1(1), 89-98.

https://doi.org/10.62207

  1. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The role of finance, governance, and competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis46(6),1545-1580.
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  3. Barney, J. B. (2000). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In Economics meets sociology in strategic management (pp. 203-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4

  1. Baykal, E. (2022). Digitalization of human resources: E-HR. In Research Anthology on Human Resource Practices for the Modern Workforce (pp. 200-218). IGI Global.

https://doi.org/ 10.4018/978-1-7998-0035-4.ch013

  1. Berdykulova, G., Daineko, Y., Kamysbayev, M., Omarova, A., Auken, V., & Abdinova, M. (2024). Digitalization of human resource department: the experience of Kazakhstani enterprise. Procedia Computer Science231, 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.217
  2. Chaiprasert, N. (2017). The relationship between human resource management and the job performance efficiency of industrial employee, Pathumthani province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Thonburi University, 11(25), 107-116. https://so03.tcithaijo.org/index.php/trujournal/article/view/85638/68111.
  3. Dolan, E., Kosasi, S., & Sari, S. N. (2022). Implementation of Competence-Based Human Resources Management in the Digital Era. Startupreneur Bisnis Digital (SABDA Journal)1(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.34306 /sabda.v1i2.133
  4. Duangekanong, D. (2021). Use of strategic human resources management (SHRM) in Thailand’s high-tech firms: Adoption and firm non-financial outcomes. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2021.1
  5. Elsawy, M. (2021). Assessing the impact of e-HRM on organizational performance: An empirical study. Available at SSRN 3967550. http://www.ashwinanokha.com/IJEB.php.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
  6. Friestad, P. (2017). The Model of Human Resource Management in Organizational for Create a Competitive Advantage in Thailand 4.0. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 5(3), 366-375. [in Thai].
  7. Gaddi, A., Kulkarni, P., Shetty, S. K., Birau, R., Popescu, V., & Hiremath, G. S. (2024). Exploring evolving HR and recruitment strategies in the age of technology advancements based on artificial intelligence. Multidisciplinary Science Journal7(2), 2025043. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025043
  8. Giao, H. N. K., Vuong, B. N., & Tung, D. D. (2020). A model of organizational culture for enhancing organizational commitment in telecom industry: Evidence from vietnam. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics17, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.23
  9. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review33(3), 114-135.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  11. Halid, H., Yusoff, Y. M., & Somu, H. (2020, May). The Relationship between digital human resource management and organizational performance. In First ASEAN Business, Environment, and Technology Symposium (ABEATS 2019) (pp. 96-99). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200514.022
  12. Hisrich, R. D., & Ramadani, V. (2017). Effective entrepreneurial management. Springer.
  13. Hoffman, N. P. (2000). An examination of the" sustainable competitive advantage" concept: past, present, and future. Academy of marketing science review4(2000), 1-16. http://www.amsreview.org/articles/hoffman04-2000.pdf.
  14. Imran, M., Hameed, W. U., & Haque, A. U. (2018). Influence of industry 4.0 on the production and service sectors in Pakistan: Evidence from textile and logistics industries. Social Sciences7(12), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120246
  15. Irjayanti, M., & Azis, A. M. (2012). Barrier factors and potential solutions for Indonesian SMEs. Procedia economics and finance4, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00315-2
  16. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership24(5), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054566
  17. Kara, A., Spillan, J. E., & DeShields Jr, O. W. (2004). An empirical investigation of the link between market orientation and business performance in nonprofit service providers. Journal of marketing theory and practice12(2), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2004.11658519
  18. Kawapapong, C., & Kokkaew, N. (2021). A Study of Factors of Human Resource Management Influencing the Performance of Thai Infrastructure Contractors Using Structural Equation Modeling. Engineering and Technology Horizons38(3), 53-62. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/lej/article/view/244759.
  19. Kawapapong, C., Kokkaew, N., & Wipulanusat, W. (2022). A study of human resource management and knowledge management influencing the performance of Thai infrastructure contractors. Journal of Engineering and Innovation15(4), 1-10. https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/eng_ubu/article/view/244770
  20. Khashman, A. M., & Al-Ryalat, H. A. (2015). The impact of electronic human resource management (E-HRM) practices on business performance in Jordanian telecommunications sector: The employees perspective. Journal of Management Research7(3), 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v7i3.7462
  21. Kiyabo, K., & Isaga, N. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance: application of firm growth and personal wealth measures. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00123-7
  22. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  23. Kongmanila, X. (2023). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Dynamics in Laos. Journal of Business and Economic Options6(2), 9-17.

http://resdojournals.com/index.php/jbeo/article/view/235.

  1. Kongpradit, T., & Kummadee, P. (2020). Human resources management to move the economy for Thailand 4.0 era. Journal of Graduate MCU KhonKaen Campus, 7(3), 45-60. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jg-mcukk/article/view/242784.
  2. Kruasom, T. (2017). Creating a competitive advantage for Thai SMEs towards Thailand 4.0 era. KKBS Journal of Business Administration and Accountancy1(1), 1-20.
  3. Kumar, R. (2017). Targeted SME financing and employment effects: What do we know and what can we do differently?. World Bank.
  4. Kyophilavong, P. (2011). SMEs access to finance: Evidence from Laos. In C. Harvie, S. Oum, & D. Narjoko (Eds.), Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Access to Finance in Selected East Asian Economies (pp. 117-150). Jakarta: ERIA Research Project Report 2010-14.
  5. Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of management review19(4), 699-727. https://doi.org/10.2307/258742
  6. Ministry of Technology and Communication. (2021). 20-year national digital economy development vision(2021-2040), 10-year national digital economy development strategy (2021-2030) and 5-year national digital economy development plan (2021-2025), Vientiane capital. https://mtc.gov.la/.
  7. Minniti, M., & Lévesque, M. (2008). Recent developments in the economics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing23(6), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.001
  8. Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148- 2963(95)00159-X
  9. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  10. Nurshabrina, N., & Adrianti, R. (2020). The effect of E-human resource management (E-HRM) on cost efficiency and productivity of employees in the company. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science5(1), 212-215. https://irjaes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/IRJAES-V5N1P208Y20.pdf.
  11. Obeidat, D. B. Y., Tawalbeh, H. F., & Masa'deh, R. E. (2018). The relationship between human resource management (HRM) practices, total quality management (TQM) practices and competitive advantages. Total Quality Management (TQM) Practices and Competitive Advantages (December 12, 2018). Modern Applied Science12(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n11p17
  12. Opoku, M. O. (2024). Human Resource Management Practices and the Performance of the Poultry Industry. Open Access Library Journal11(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111236
  13. Pham, H. (2020). Impact of human resource management practices on enterprises' competitive advantages and business performance: Evidence from telecommunication industry. Management Science Letters10(4), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.10.025
  14. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, N.Y: The Free Press.
  15. Pribadi, H., & Kanai, K. (2011). Examining and exploring Indonesia small and medium enterprise performance: An empirical study. Asian Journal of Business Management3(2), 98-107.
  16. Quang, T., & Thavisay, C. (1999). Privatization and human resource development issue: A preliminary study of state-owned enterprises in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management7(1), 101-123.
  17. Rosli, M. M. (2012). Competitive strategy of Malaysian small and medium enterprises: An exploratory investigation. American International Journal of Contemporary Research2(1), 93-105.https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a776ffef12c635732b66f9e7037cf1eeed72b163.
  18. Roth, P. L., & Craig, A. (1998). Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: Norms and correlates, 1990–1994. Journal of management24(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80055-5.
  19. Rovinelli, R. & Hambleton, R. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Education Research, 2, 49–60.
  20. Runde, D., Bandura, R., & Lee, R. (2022). Digitalizing Laos: Improving Government Transparency, the Business Environment, and Human Capital. https://www.csis.org/analysis/digitalizing-laos-improving-governmenttransparency-business-environment-and-human-capital.
  21. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
  22. Seipalla, F., Liem, N., Siregar, D. S., Martdana, A., & Paramarta, V. (2024). The Impact of Digitalization on Human Resource Management Practices. FIRM Journal of Management Studies9(2), 136-143.http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/firm.v9i2.5553
  23. Shaddiq, S., & Irpan, M. (2023). Governance of Human Resources Management in the Digital Era. Journal of Business and Management Studies5(3), 80-96. https://doi: 10.32996/jbms.2023.5.3.8
  24. Southiseng, N., & Walsh, J. (2010). Competition and management issues of SME entrepreneurs in Laos: Evidence from empirical studies in Vientiane Municipality, Savannakhet and Luang Prabang. Asian Journal of Business Management2(3), 57-72.
  25. Tran, L. Q. T., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). Digital Economy: A Comparative Study in ASEAN. Theory, Methodology, Practice-Review of Business and Management18(02), 83-92.
  26. Viyaketh, N. (2010). Policy and Progress in Small and Medium Enterprise Development on Laos. Business Management Journal. LJI: NUOL.
  27. Waheed, A., Xiaoming, M., Waheed, S., Ahmad, N., & Tian-tian, S. (2020). E-HRM implementation, adoption and its predictors: a case of small and medium enterprises of Pakistan. International Journal of Information Technology and Management19(2-3), 162-180. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/95794976/IJITM.2020.10621720221215-1-1lpbg4f-libre.pdf.
  28. Wijaya, P. Y., & Suasih, N. N. R. (2020). The effect of knowledge management on competitive advantage and business performance: A study of silver craft SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review8(4), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080406
  29. Wongsansukcharoen, J., & Thaweepaiboonwong, J. (2023). Effect of innovations in human resource practices, innovation capabilities, and competitive advantage on small and medium enterprises’ performance in Thailand. European Research on Management and Business Economics29(1), 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100210  
  30. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(2), 139-153.
  31. Yusuf, M., Satia, H., Bernardianto, R., Nurhasanah, N., Irwani, I., & Setyoko, P. (2023). Exploring the role of digital leadership and digital transformation on the performance of the public sector organizations. International Journal of Data and Network Science7(4), 1983-1990. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.014
  32. Yuwanda, T., Fadhlan, A., & Daud, I. (2023). Building Competitive Advantage through Human Capital and the Impact on Business Performance: Analysis at Individual and Organizational Level. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen)14(1), 72-86. http://jdm.unnes.ac.id.

Human resource management is a key area in the digital age, firstly in business. It is central to a business strategy, facilitates the attainment of competitive advantage and improves business performance. This research sought to examine the role of certain factors that affect competitive advantage, test these factors through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and construct a model depicting the interrelationships between business performance in Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR. This research used quantitative research methods only. Data were obtained from a sample size of 256 SMEs in Vientiane Capital and were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling for hypothesis testing. The research findings from testing the hypotheses shows that the Human Resource Management factors in this era of digitalization greatly impacts on competitive, with the t-value = 9.86, influence coefficient β=0.87, and P-value < 0.001, likewise, the factors of competitive advantage have a positive impact on firm performance in the case of Vientiane Capital, the hypothesis is accepted at the t-value of 2.1, influence β=0.36 and P-value <0.05, In addition, human resources management factors in this digital era also significantly impact the business performance in Vientiane Capital, the evidence for this is that t-Value is 2.88 with an influence coefficient β=0.54 and P-value <0.05. Further, with respect to business performance the SEM model has the following values: (χ2/df)= 1.78; GFI=0.97; AGFI=0.93; CFI=0.99; RMSEA=0.05. Both factors account for business performance variance at R2=0.76. The findings of the research underline the importance of Human Resource Management in the development of firm’s competitive advantage and efficiency of business activity in rudimentary states regulating them within age. The evidence indicates that firms in Vientiane Capital should place more emphasis on their HRM practices in order to achieve greater competitive advantage and improved performance.

Keywords : Cost Strategy; Customer Value; Digital Human Resource Management; Learning and Growth; Vientiane Capital; Lao PDR.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe