Human-Wildlife Conflict and its Impact on Tourism in Manas and Kaziranga National Parks


Authors : Ashfakur Rahman; Dr. Sunil Kumar

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3j22edmh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3t3uxdxz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1148

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : In this research paper, I have thoroughly described the topic “Human-Wildlife Conflict and its Impact on Tourism in Manas and Kaziranga National Parks.” Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in Assam’s Manas and Kaziranga National Parks—both UNESCO World Heritage Sites—poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and sustainable tourism. These parks, home to endangered species like the one-horned Rhinoceros, Bengal tiger, and Asian elephant, face escalating conflicts due to habitat fragmentation, agricultural expansion, and climate-induced flooding. Such conflicts result in crop damage, livestock predation, and human fatalities, triggering retaliatory killings and strained community relations. The tourism sector, a vital economic driver, suffers due to safety concerns, declining wildlife visibility, and infrastructure damage. Data reveals a 15% drop in Kaziranga’s peak-season tourism and a 20% decline in foreign visitors to Manas over five years, leading to annual revenue losses of INR 2 cr. and INR 80 lakh, respectively. Poaching exacerbates the crisis, with Kaziranga reporting 25+ incidents in five years, while infrastructure damages cost INR 1.5 cr. (Kaziranga) and INR 50 lakh (Manas) in 2022 alone. Mitigation strategies—such as eco-tourism zones, drone surveillance, and community compensation (INR 4 lakh per fatality)—show promise but require scaling. Effective solutions demand integrated approaches: habitat restoration, wildlife corridors, and participatory conservation programs. Balancing ecological integrity with tourism growth is critical to safeguarding these parks’ global significance, ensuring economic stability 1 for local communities, and preserving India’s natural heritage. Without urgent intervention, persistent conflicts risk further tourism decline, undermining both conservation and livelihoods in these ecologically fragile regions.

Keywords : Human-Wildlife Conflict, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, Fragmentation, Crop Damage, Livestock Predation, Human Fatalities.

References :

  1. Pradhan, S. M., & Choudhury, S. (2024). Human-wildlife conflict: A case study of Manas National Park, Assam (India). In Indigeneity, development and sustainability (pp. 381- 393). Springer Nature.
  2. Bano, R., Khan, A., Mehmood, T., Abbas, S., Khan, M. Z., Shedayi, A. A., Zaman, S., & Nawaz,M. A. (2021). Patterns of livestock depredation and Human–wildlife conflict in  Misgar valley ofHunza, Pakistan. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02205-2
  3. Saikia, A. A., &Goswami, C. (2021). Satisfaction towards park attributes and visitors’ willingness to pay: A comparative study of Kaziranga National Park and Manas National Park. In S. Sruthi& R. K. Gupta (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Research Volume 2 (pp. 6–14).
  4. Mekonen, S. (2020). Coexistence between human and wildlife: The nature, causes and mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast Ethiopia. BMCEcology, 20(51), 2–9.
  5. Bhattacharya, A., Chetry, B., & Sarkar, P. (2018). Status of human-elephant conflict in ChirangRipu Elephant Reserve of Assam, India. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 6(4), 384–391.
  6. Chakrabarty, P., Pan, S., &Mandal, R. (2019). Promoting wildlife tourism on geotourism landscape: A study in Manas and Kaziranga National Parks of Assam, India. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 24(1), 189–200.
  7. Kherkatary, A. (2015). Status of ecotourism development in BTAD of Assam with special reference to Manas National Park. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics &Commerce, 5(2), 32–40.
  8. Goswami, R., & Ganesh, T. (2014). Carnivore and herbivore densities in the immediate aftermath of ethno-political conflict: The case of Manas National Park, India. Tropical Conservation Science, 7(3), 475–487.
  9. Hussain, S. A., Barthwal, S., Badola, R., Rahman, S. M. T., Rastogi, A., Tuboi, C., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2012). An analysis of livelihood linkages of tourism in Kaziranga National Park, a natural World Heritage Site in India. PARKS, 18(2), 21.

In this research paper, I have thoroughly described the topic “Human-Wildlife Conflict and its Impact on Tourism in Manas and Kaziranga National Parks.” Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in Assam’s Manas and Kaziranga National Parks—both UNESCO World Heritage Sites—poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and sustainable tourism. These parks, home to endangered species like the one-horned Rhinoceros, Bengal tiger, and Asian elephant, face escalating conflicts due to habitat fragmentation, agricultural expansion, and climate-induced flooding. Such conflicts result in crop damage, livestock predation, and human fatalities, triggering retaliatory killings and strained community relations. The tourism sector, a vital economic driver, suffers due to safety concerns, declining wildlife visibility, and infrastructure damage. Data reveals a 15% drop in Kaziranga’s peak-season tourism and a 20% decline in foreign visitors to Manas over five years, leading to annual revenue losses of INR 2 cr. and INR 80 lakh, respectively. Poaching exacerbates the crisis, with Kaziranga reporting 25+ incidents in five years, while infrastructure damages cost INR 1.5 cr. (Kaziranga) and INR 50 lakh (Manas) in 2022 alone. Mitigation strategies—such as eco-tourism zones, drone surveillance, and community compensation (INR 4 lakh per fatality)—show promise but require scaling. Effective solutions demand integrated approaches: habitat restoration, wildlife corridors, and participatory conservation programs. Balancing ecological integrity with tourism growth is critical to safeguarding these parks’ global significance, ensuring economic stability 1 for local communities, and preserving India’s natural heritage. Without urgent intervention, persistent conflicts risk further tourism decline, undermining both conservation and livelihoods in these ecologically fragile regions.

Keywords : Human-Wildlife Conflict, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, Fragmentation, Crop Damage, Livestock Predation, Human Fatalities.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe