Authors : Dr. Dino A. Reyes; Purita P. Cabigat; Dr. Flordaliza A. Ananayo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/47rrfzpb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ysrdz46w

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1116

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : A crucial part of higher education institutions (HEIs) are Community Extension Services (CES), which operate as a conduit for converting academic knowledge into useful, community-focused solutions. The purpose of this study, "Identifying Best Practices and Current Strengths of Community Extension Services at Ifugao State University (IFSU)," was to investigate the institutional advantages, successful strategies, and sustainability mechanisms that contribute to the social relevance and impact of IFSU's CES programs. Dewey's (1938) Service-Learning Theory and DeBord's (2007) Collaborative Partnership Framework served as the foundation for this study, which used a qualitative case study design to investigate the dynamics of CES implementation on university campuses. Interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis were used to collect data from CES coordinators, students, professors, and community stakeholders. The results showed a number of interconnected themes that reflected IFSU's strengths and best practices in CES implementation. These include making sure that extension programs directly support institutional and national development agendas and that CES activities are strongly aligned with the university's vision, mission, and goals. Partnerships between local government entities, non-governmental organizations, and industry stakeholders improve resource mobilization and innovation, according to the study, which also recognized collaboration and partnerships as essential to program sustainability. Furthermore, departments used their academic knowledge to meet particular community needs, which strengthened the relevance and efficacy of discipline-based program implementation. While the volunteer culture promoted a sense of shared commitment among staff, students, and community members, the incorporation of service-learning methodologies further enhanced student participation and civic duty. Lastly, the continuity and long-term effects of extension initiatives were guaranteed by the existence of sustainability structures, which included community ownership and follow-up procedures. According to the study's findings, community involvement, academic integration, cooperative relationships, and institutional alignment all work together to make IFSU's Community Extension Services successful. Together, these elements support CES's long-term viability and revolutionary potential as a platform for social empowerment and inclusive development. In light of these conclusions, the study suggests that in order to improve community-university collaborations, service-learning should be further institutionalized, stakeholder collaboration should be improved, discipline-based extension programs should be developed, and sustainability models should be adopted. The findings offer a useful foundation for other public schools and universities looking to enhance their CES procedures and make a more significant contribution to national and local development.

Keywords : Community Extension Services, Best Practices, Higher Education Institutions, Ifugao State University, Service-Learning, Collaboration, Sustainability.

References :

1. Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU). (2022). Service-learning and community engagement programs. Ateneo de Manila University Office for Social Concern and Involvement.
2. Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 208–222.
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service-learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257
5. Byrd, A. M., Anderson, J. E., & Brierley, G. (2012). University-community partnerships: Strategies for building successful relationships. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 105–123.
6. Cardenas, M., Dela Cruz, J., & Bautista, R. (2020). Community engagement in Philippine higher education: Strengthening partnerships for sustainable development. Philippine Journal of Extension and Development Studies, 12(1), 44–59.
7. Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2016). CHED Memorandum Order No. 52, s. 2016: Guidelines for the extension programs of state universities and colleges. CHED.
8. DeBord, K. (2007). Framework for building collaborative partnerships. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.
9. De Guzman, M. (2019). The role of higher education institutions in community development: A Philippine perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 6(2), 32–40.
10. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
11. Gonzales, R. (2016). Research-based community extension: Foundation for sustainable development. Philippine Social Science Review, 68(1), 55–72.
12. Gonzales, R. (2022). Innovative community extension approaches among Philippine SUCs. Journal of Extension Education and Development, 14(1), 1–12.
13. Ifugao State University (IFSU). (2023). Annual report 2023: Empowering communities through education, research, and extension. Ifugao State University Publication Office.
14. Israel, G. D., & Ilvento, T. W. (2005). Extension and higher education partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Extension, 43(1), 1–8.
15. Magno, C. P., & Pasion, J. R. (2021). Building sustainable community partnerships in Philippine higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102414
16. Mariano Marcos State University (MMSU). (2021). Research and extension bulletin: Science-based innovations for rural development. Office of Research, Development, and Extension, MMSU.
17. Republic Act No. 7722. (1994). Higher Education Act of 1994. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1994/05/18/republic-act-no-7722
18. Simpson, L. (2015). Engaged scholarship: Extending the reach of academic research through community service. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(4), 7–28.
19. Tadeo, R. A., Bagano, J. L., & Limos, M. E. (2020). Institutionalizing community extension at Benguet State University: Best practices and challenges. Cordillera Journal of Extension and Applied Research, 5(1), 12–25.
20. University of Santo Tomas (UST). (2022). UST Simbahayan community development office: Service-learning initiatives. University of Santo Tomas Office for Community Development.
21. University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB). (2021). Participatory action research and extension services framework. UPLB Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Extension.
22. Visayas State University (VSU). (2020). Community extension framework and guidelines. Office of Extension and Innovation, VSU.
23. Central Luzon State University (CLSU). (2021). Agri-technology transfer and community engagement report. CLSU Office of Extension and Training.
24. Benguet State University (BSU). (2020). Extension programs for sustainable highland communities. BSU Office of Extension Services.