Immediate Effects of Kinesiotaping Versus Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Fascial Line over Hamstring Area for Superficial Back Line Flexibility in Young Adults - A Single- Blinded Randomized Control Trial


Authors : Dr. Anoli Gupta; Dr. Sneha Ganu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/e73frsfw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3m7yjwd8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug473

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Purpose Hamstring tightness, a prevalent problem, affects Fascia and hence the whole Superficial Back line. This affects the whole Fascia line Flexibility and can cause problems distally. Hence, there is a need for effective treatment for Fascial disorders. Kinesiotaping and Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) are commonly used for the treatment.  Methods A single-blinded randomized control trial with a total of 90 healthy participants was included into two groups, IASTM (n=45) and Kinesiotaping (n=45). Each group was given a treatment of 15 minutes and all participants were assessed with the Fingertip to Floor test, Passive Straight Leg Raise and the Active Knee Extension test pre and immediately post- treatment.  Results Using a paired t-test, inter-group analysis was done where both groups, IASTM and Kinesiotaping, showed a significant difference (p≤0.05) in all the outcome measures, while intra-group analysis showed that the group treated with IASTM showed a significant difference only in the Passive Straight leg Raise and Active Knee Extension (p≤0.05).  Conclusion Instrument-assisted soft Tissue Mobilization was superior to Kinesiotaping in young adults. It showed a significant difference in improving the passive Straight Leg Raise and Active knee extension test, but not for the Fingertip to Floor test. Both Kinesiotaping and Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization were effective in improving Superficial Back Line Flexibility when applied over the Hamstring area.

Keywords : Fascial Disorders, Fascial Manipulation, Hamstring Tightness, IASTM, Kinesiotaping, Superficial Back Line.

References :

  1. Koli B, Anap D. Prevalence and severity of hamstring tightness among college student: a cross sectional study. International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research. 2018;4(2):65.
  2. Thakur D, Rose S. A Study To Find Out The Correlation Between The Right And Left Hamstring Length In Both Genders To Determine The Prevalence Of Hamstring Tightness Among College Students. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 2016 Dec;06(04):46–52.
  3. Fauris P, López-de-Celis C, Canet-Vintró M, Martin JC, Llurda-Almuzara L, Rodríguez-Sanz J, Labata-Lezaun N, Simon M, Pérez-Bellmunt A. Does Self-Myofascial Release Cause a Remote Hamstring Stretching Effect Based on Myofascial Chains? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;18(23):12356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312356. PMID: 34886078; PMCID: PMC8656845.
  4. Gulrandhe P, Yadav V, Naqvi WM. Correlation Between Foot Posture and Hamstring Muscle Tightness. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):e42046. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37602068/
  5. ‌Myers TW. Anatomy trains : myofascial meridians for manual and movement therapists. Second Edition. Edinburgh ; New York: Elsevier; 2009. Page no. 73, 74, 77
  6. Mate S. Effect of Kinesio Taping with Fascia Manipulation Technique on Superficial Back Line Over Hamstring Fascia to Increase the Range of Motion – An Observational Study. International Journal Of Scientific Advances. 2022;3(2).
  7. Findley, T., Chaudhry, H., Stecco, A., & Roman, M. (2012). Fascia research – A narrative review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 16(1), 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.09.004.
  8. Langevin HM. Fascia Mobility, Proprioception, and Myofascial Pain. Life. 2021 Jul 8;11(7):668.
  9. Stecco A, Stern R, Fantoni I, De Caro R, Stecco C, Fascial Disorders: Implications for Treatment, PM&R (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.006.
  10. Chaitow L. Fascial dysfunction : manual therapy approaches. Edinburgh: Handspring Publishing; 2018.
  11. Hughes E, Koenig J, Lee R, McDermott K, Freilicher T, Pitcher M. Pilot study assessing the effect of Fascial Manipulation on fascial densifications and associated pain. Eur J Transl Myol. 2022 Mar 3;32(1):10369. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10369. PMID: 35244363; PMCID: PMC8992677.
  12. Williams W, Selkow NM. Self-Myofascial Release of the Superficial Back Line Improves Sit-and-Reach Distance. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2019 Mar 12;1–19.
  13. Hansberger BL, Loutsch R, Hancock C, Bonser R, Zeigel A, Baker RT. Evaluation the relationship between clinical assessments of apparent Hamstring Tightness: a Correlational  Analysis. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2019 Apr;14(2):253–63.
  14. Fousekis K, Eid K, Tafa E, Gkrilias P, Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P, et al. Can the application of the Ergon® IASTM treatment on remote parts of the superficial back myofascial line be equally effective with the local application for the improvement of the hamstrings’ flexibility? A randomized control study. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2019;31(7):508–11.
  15. Simatou M, Papandreou M, Billis E, Tsekoura M, Mylonas K, Fousekis K. Effects of the Ergon® instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique (IASTM), foam rolling, and static stretching application to different parts of the myofascial lateral line on hip joint flexibility. Journal of Physical Therapy Science [Internet]. 2020;32(4):288–91. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/32/4/32_2019-252/_article/-char/ja/
  16. Anjum, N., Sheikh, R. K., Omer, A., Anwar, K., Khan, M. M. H., Aftab, A., & Awan, W. A. (2023). Comparison of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular stretching on hamstring flexibility in patients with knee osteoarthritis. PeerJ, 11, e16506.
  17. Peñalver-Barrios ML, Liso´n JF, Ballester- Salvador J, Schmitt J, Ezzedinne-Angulo A, Arguisuelas MD, et al. (2021) A novel (targeted) kinesio taping application on chronic low back pain: Randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE 16(5): e0250686.
  18. Hanson JH, Ostrem JD, Davies BL. Effect of Kinesiology Taping on Upper Torso Mobility and Shoulder Pain and Disability in US Masters National Championship Swimmers: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2019 May;42(4):247–53.
  19. Gunn LJ, Stewart JC, Morgan B, Metts ST, Magnuson JM, Iglowski NJ, et al. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques improve hamstring flexibility better than static stretching alone: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2018 Aug;27(1):15–23.
  20. Bordoni B, Mahabadi N, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Fascia [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493232/
  21. Brandl A, Egner C, Schwarze M, Reer R, Schmidt T, Schleip R. Immediate effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on hydration content in lumbar myofascial tissues: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Jan 28;12(3):1009. doi:10.3390/jcm12031009
  22. França MED, Amorim M dos S, Sinhorim L, Santos GM, do Nascimento IB. Myofascial release strategies and technique recommendations for athletic performance: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1;36:30–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1360859223001006

Purpose Hamstring tightness, a prevalent problem, affects Fascia and hence the whole Superficial Back line. This affects the whole Fascia line Flexibility and can cause problems distally. Hence, there is a need for effective treatment for Fascial disorders. Kinesiotaping and Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) are commonly used for the treatment.  Methods A single-blinded randomized control trial with a total of 90 healthy participants was included into two groups, IASTM (n=45) and Kinesiotaping (n=45). Each group was given a treatment of 15 minutes and all participants were assessed with the Fingertip to Floor test, Passive Straight Leg Raise and the Active Knee Extension test pre and immediately post- treatment.  Results Using a paired t-test, inter-group analysis was done where both groups, IASTM and Kinesiotaping, showed a significant difference (p≤0.05) in all the outcome measures, while intra-group analysis showed that the group treated with IASTM showed a significant difference only in the Passive Straight leg Raise and Active Knee Extension (p≤0.05).  Conclusion Instrument-assisted soft Tissue Mobilization was superior to Kinesiotaping in young adults. It showed a significant difference in improving the passive Straight Leg Raise and Active knee extension test, but not for the Fingertip to Floor test. Both Kinesiotaping and Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization were effective in improving Superficial Back Line Flexibility when applied over the Hamstring area.

Keywords : Fascial Disorders, Fascial Manipulation, Hamstring Tightness, IASTM, Kinesiotaping, Superficial Back Line.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe