Authors : Raees Azam; Ghulam Murtaza

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/25ryep99

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4yz745y9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14831448

Abstract : In order to address issues like ethical dilemmas, cultural bias, and complex text interpretation, this study intends to investigate the revolutionary effects of artificial intelligence on English language translation, emphasizing its improvements in accuracy, accessibility, and real-time capabilities. The translation of English has been transformed by artificial intelligence (AI), which has improved accessibility, accuracy, and speed. AI-powered solutions like Google Translate and Deeply have greatly enhanced the quality of translations through sophisticated neural machine translation algorithms, allowing for a more nuanced comprehension of context, idioms, and cultural nuances. Additionally, AI enables real-time translation, promoting inclusion and removing linguistic barriers in international communication. Nonetheless, there are still issues, like as sporadic errors, trouble comprehending extremely complex or imaginative texts, and moral dilemmas like cultural bias and data privacy. Notwithstanding these drawbacks, linguists' and companies' workflows have been expedited by the use of AI in translation, opening the door for increased cross-cultural cooperation and establishing new benchmarks for language services. The results demonstrate how AI may significantly increase the accessibility and accuracy of English translations. AI promotes effective, real-time communication and improves cross-cultural understanding worldwide, despite obstacles like cultural prejudice and complicated text management. By addressing issues of cultural bias and data privacy, policymakers can promote the creation of moral AI translation systems. Encouraging openness, inclusive algorithms, and interdisciplinary cooperation will guarantee fair access to AI-powered language services, promoting intercultural dialogue and understanding.

Keywords : AI-Powered Language; Complicated Text; Cross-Cultural Cooperation; Cultural Bias; Revolutionary Effects.

References :

1. K. Dai and Q. Liu, “Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes: Challenges and opportunities in the spotlight,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 159, p. 108354, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354.
2. A. W. Ou, C. Stöhr, and H. Malmström, “Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective,” System, vol. 121, p. 103225, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225.
3. J. Du and B. K. Daniel, “Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, p. 100230, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100230.
4. L. Law, “Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 6, p. 100174, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174.
5. M. Portaz, R. Cabestrero, P. Quirós, and O. C. Santos, “AI-Powered Psychomotor Learning Through Basketball Practice: Opportunities and Challenges,” Mind, Body, Digit. Brains, pp. 193–215, 2024.
6. O. Uzumcu and H. Acilmis, “Do innovative teachers use AI-powered tools more interactively? a study in the context of diffusion of innovation theory,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1109–1128, 2024.
7. M. SaberiKamarposhti et al., “A comprehensive review of AI-enhanced smart grid integration for hydrogen energy: Advances, challenges, and future prospects,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 67, pp. 1009–1025, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.129.
8. Z. Liu, Y. Gao, and B. Liu, “An artificial intelligence-based electric multiple units using a smart power grid system,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 13376–13388, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.138.
9. K.-W. Lee and C.-Y. Li, “It is not merely a chat: Transforming chatbot affordances into dual identification and loyalty,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 74, p. 103447, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103447.
10. W. Strielkowski, A. Vlasov, K. Selivanov, K. Muraviev, and V. Shakhnov, “Prospects and Challenges of the Machine Learning and Data-Driven Methods for the Predictive Analysis of Power Systems: A Review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 10. 2023. doi: 10.3390/en16104025.
11. T. Ahmad et al., “Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status Quo, challenges and opportunities,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 289, p. 125834, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125834.
12. A. Heidari, N. Jafari Navimipour, H. Dag, and M. Unal, “Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–45, 2024, doi: 10.1002/widm.1520.
13. Y. Qin, Z. Xu, X. Wang, and M. Skare, “Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1736–1770, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01183-2.
14. P. Trammell and A. Korinek, “Economic Growth Under Transformative AI,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4616883.
15. A. Korinek and J. Stiglitz, “Artificial Intelligence, Globalization, and Strategies for Economic Development,” Inst. New Econ. Think. Work. Pap. Ser., pp. 1–53, 2021, doi: 10.36687/inetwp146.
16. A. S. Irshad, G. Ahmad Ludin, S. Ludin, M. H. Elkholy, S. Elias, and T. Senjyu, “Integration and performance analysis of optimal large-scale hybrid PV and pump hydro storage system based upon floating PV for practical application,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 22, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100599.
17. M. Abdullah, Z. Sulong, and M. Ashraful Ferdous Chowdhury, “Explainable deep learning model for stock price forecasting using textual analysis,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 249, p. 123740, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123740.
18. X. Han et al., “More Data, More Relations, More Context and More Openness: A Review and Outlook for Relation Extraction,” Apr. 2020, Accessed: Jun. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.03186
19. C. Li and H. Chen, “Cultural psychology of english translation through computer vision-based robotic interpretation,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 84, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101938.
20. J. Hatzius, J. Briggs, D. Kodnani, and G. Pierdomenico, “Global-Economics-Analyst_-The-Potentially-Large-Effects-of-Artificial-Intelligence-,” Goldman Sachs Econ. Res., no. March, pp. 1–20, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.ansa.it/documents/1680080409454_ert.pdf
21. L. Pereira, M. Pinto, R. L. da Costa, Á. Dias, and R. Gonçalves, “The new swot for a sustainable world,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–31, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/JOITMC7010018.
22. Z. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Long, S. Wan, and H. Deng, “Application of IoT audio technology based on sensor networks in English speaking teaching system,” Meas. Sensors, vol. 33, p. 101155, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101155.
23. S. Luo, D. Zou, and L. Kohnke, “A systematic review of research on xReality (XR) in the English classroom: Trends, research areas, benefits, and challenges,” Comput. Educ. X Real., vol. 4, p. 100049, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100049.
24. M. H. Al-khresheh, “Bridging technology and pedagogy from a globa`l lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, p. 100218, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218.
25. A. Kondo, C. Wang, K. Naruse, K. Niitsu, and D. Long, “Comparison of global nursing education and necessary supports for nurse educators between Japan and four English-speaking countries: An international cross-sectional study,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 79, p. 104074, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104074.
26. L. Deng, “Exploring the effect of students’ language learning strategies on Chinese students’ perceptions of native and non-native English speaker teachers,” System, vol. 123, p. 103330, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103330.
27. S. Ivanović, J. Tomićević-Dubljević, I. Bjedov, I. Đorđević, and I. Živojinović, “Cultural landscape management in context: Local communities’ perceptions under Jadar mineral extraction project in Serbia,” Extr. Ind. Soc., vol. 16, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101361.
28. L. Prentice et al., “Reaction to norm transgressions and Islamization threat in culturally tight and loose contexts: a cross-cultural comparison of Germany versus Russia,” Cult. Brain, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–69, 2020, doi: 10.1007/S40167-018-0073-3.
29. D. Tafazoli, “Exploring the potential of generative AI in democratizing English language education,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100275, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100275.
30. C. Zhu and C. C. Lee, “The effects of low-carbon pilot policy on technological innovation: Evidence from prefecture-level data in China,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 183, 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121955.
31. R. Liang, “Natural calamity and cultural formation: A study on Yellow River flooding region,” China Econ. Q. Int., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–28, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ceqi.2022.01.001.
32. S. Nag, “Does reliable electricity mean lesser agricultural labor wages? Evidence from Indian villages,” Energy Policy, vol. 190, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114151.
33. B. Qin, Y. Yu, L. Ge, L. Yang, and Y. Guo, “Does Eco-Compensation Alleviate Rural Poverty? New Evidence from National Key Ecological Function Areas in China,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 17, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH191710899.
34. Y. Fang, “Influence of foreign direct investment from China on achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in African countries,” Chinese J. Popul. Resour. Environ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 213–220, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.CJPRE.2021.12.023.
35. S. A. Carnohan et al., “Next generation application of DPSIR for sustainable policy implementation,” Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain., vol. 5, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.CRSUST.2022.100201.
36. Q. Zheng, T. Ha, A. V. Prishchepov, Y. Zeng, H. Yin, and L. P. Koh, “The neglected role of abandoned cropland in supporting both food security and climate change mitigation,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41837-y.
37. Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Opinion Paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 71, p. 102642, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
38. W. Dong, D. Pan, and S. Kim, “Exploring the integration of IoT and Generative AI in English language education: Smart tools for personalized learning experiences,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 82, p. 102397, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102397.
39. S. Raschka and B. Kaufman, “Machine learning and AI-based approaches for bioactive ligand discovery and GPCR-ligand recognition,” Methods, vol. 180, pp. 89–110, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.06.016.
40. B. L. Moorhouse and L. Kohnke, “The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators,” System, vol. 122, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103290.
41. J. Collenette, K. Atkinson, and T. Bench-Capon, “Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: A study on the European Court of Human Rights,” Artif. Intell., vol. 317, p. 103861, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103861.
42. M. Burry, “Chapter 1 - A new agenda for AI-based urban design and planning,” in Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning and Design, I. As, P. Basu, and P. Talwar, Eds., Elsevier, 2022, pp. 3–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823941-4.00005-6.
43. D. Wu, M. Chen, X. Chen, and X. Liu, “Analyzing K-12 AI education: A large language model study of classroom instruction on learning theories, pedagogy, tools, and AI literacy,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100295, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100295.
44. S. Kumari, J. Chowdhry, and M. Chandra Garg, “AI-enhanced adsorption modeling: Challenges, applications, and bibliographic analysis,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 351, p. 119968, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119968.
45. S. Shamsuddinova, P. Heryani, and M. A. Naval, “Evolution to revolution: Critical exploration of educators’ perceptions of the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the teaching and learning process in the GCC region,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 125, p. 102326, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102326.
46. S. C. Kishore, S. Perumal, R. Atchudan, M. Alagan, A. K. Sundramoorthy, and Y. R. Lee, “A Critical Review on Artificial Intelligence for Fuel Cell Diagnosis,” Catalysts, vol. 12, no. 7. 2022. doi: 10.3390/catal12070743.
47. E. I. Yuwono, D. Tjondronegoro, C. Riverola, and J. Loy, “Co-creation in action: Bridging the knowledge gap in artificial intelligence among innovation champions,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100272, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100272.