⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Impact of Blood Sampling in Critical Care Settings in South India: Prospective Observational Study


Authors : Dr. Yuvaraj Arumugam; Dr. P. Vivekananthan; Dr. Sivakumar M Nandakumar

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3kedacye

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5xt9ammj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr2048

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: Frequent and unnecessary sampling could lead to blood loss, which is a major factor causing iatrogenic anaemia. Optimising blood sampling practices could help prevent the need for blood transfusions. Our study aims to assess the blood loss, haemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion requirement due to blood sampling in critical care units. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in the adult critical care units of a tertiary care hospital over three months in Coimbatore, South India. A total of 193 consecutive patients were included by convenience sampling. Blood loss incurred other than blood sampling was observed to negate the bias. Results: Thirty-one (15.8%) patients experienced a significant drop in haemoglobin, and the average blood volume drawn was 87 ml per patient during ICU admission. Patients with invasive catheters incurred higher blood loss and received more blood transfusions (63 units) compared to those with non-invasive catheters (4 units). Unplanned blood samples (stat) were 1186 (9.96 per patient) with invasive catheters. The calculated p-value for blood wastage and transfusion is highly significant (p=0.013). The highly substantial p-values were seen for blood withdrawn between invasive sampling and peripheral sampling per patient and per day (p=0.000 & p=0.00). Conclusion: Our study suggests that reducing the incidence of iatrogenic anaemia and blood transfusion requirements is possible using a closed blood sampling system, especially for sicker patients and those expected to stay for more than 5 days, avoiding unplanned and frequent investigations, using small-volume blood collection tubes, and planned blood sampling timings 12 hours apart as an ICU protocol.

Keywords : Anaemia; Blood Sampling; Blood Transfusion; Hospital-Acquired Anaemia; Intensive Care Unit; Packed Red Blood Cells; Small Volume Tubes.

References :

    1. Juárez-Vela R, Andrés-Esteban EM, Gea-Caballero V, Sánchez-González JL, Marcos-Neira P, Serrano-Lázaro A, et al. Related Factors of anaemia in critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):1031.
    2. Tyler Edward James, Rebecca Barty, Yang Liu, Bram Rochwerg, Nancy Heddle, Deborah M Siegal; Blood Loss Due to Laboratory Testing in Critical Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Blood 2018; 132 (Supplement 1): 4885. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-114289
    3. Adams JC, Barrett C, Spruyt M. Iatrogenic blood loss in critical care: A prospective observational study conducted at Universitas Academic Hospital in the Free State Province, South Africa. South Afr J Crit Care. 2022 Aug 5;38(2) doi: 10.7196/SAJCC. 2022.v38i2.539.
    4. Coene KLM, Roos AN, Scharnhorst V. Iatrogenic anemia/Twenty-five million liters of blood into the sewer: comment. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 1160–1.
    5. Martin ND, Scantling D. Hospital-acquired anemia: a contemporary review of etiologies and prevention strategies. J Infus Nurs. 2015;38(5):3308.
    6. Cioc A, Fodor R, Benedek O, Moldovan A, Copotoiu SM. Blood sampling as a cause of anemia in a general ICU - a pilot study. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):13-16. PMID: 28913450; PMCID: PMC5505326.
    7. Keogh S, Dhanani J, Levido A, et al. Evaluation of a closed loop-blood sampling system in intensive care: A pilot randomised controlled trial. The ENCLOSE trial. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Apr; 75:103364. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103364. Epub 2022 Dec 15. PMID: 36528456.
    8. Siegal DM, Belley-Côté EP, Lee SF, et al, Small-Volume Blood Collection Tubes to Reduce Transfusions in Intensive Care: The STRATUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1872-1881. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20820. PMID: 37824152; PMCID: PMC10570918.
    9. Torredà, Marta & Arias-Rivera, S. & Delgado, María & Campos Asensio, Concepción & Fernández-Castillo, Rafael-Jesús. (2023). Effectiveness of closed blood sampling systems in intensive care patients: a scoping review. Enfermería Intensiva (English ed.). 35. 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.05.001.
    10. Keogh S, Mathew S, Ullman AJ, Rickard CM, Coyer F. What blood conservation practices are effective at reducing blood sampling volumes and other clinical sequelae in intensive care? A systematic review. Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):1129-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 Jan 10. PMID: 36635184.
    11. Bench, S., 2020. Critical care nurses' views and experiences of pre analytical factors influencing point-of-care testing. Qual. Stud. Point Care 19 (4), 97–100.
    12. Briggs EN, Hawkins DJ, Hodges AM, Monk AM. Small volume vacuum phlebotomy tubes: a controlled before-and-after study of a patient blood management initiative in an Australian adult intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Dec;21(4):251-57. PMID: 31778631.
    13. Dolman, H.S.; Evans, K.; Zimmerman, L.H.; Lavery, T.; Baylor, A.E.; Wilson, R.F.; Tyburski, J.G. Impact of minimizing diagnostic blood loss in the critically ill. Surgery 2015, 158, 1083–1087.
    14. Bodley T, Chan M, Levi O, et al. Patient harm associated with serial phlebotomy and blood waste in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One, 2021;16(1), https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243782
    15. Wu, Y.; Spaulding, A.C.; Borkar, S.; Shoaei, M.M.; Mendoza, M.; Grant, R.L.; Barber, B.W.; Johns, G.S.; Franco, P.M. Reducing Blood Loss by Changing Small Volume Tubes for Laboratory Testing. Mayo Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual. Outcomes 2021, 5, 72–83.
    16. Adam, E.H.; Zacharowski, K.; Hintereder, G.; Zierfuss, F.; Raimann, F.; Meybohm, P. Validation of a New Small-Volume Sodium Citrate Collection Tube for Coagulation Testing in Critically Ill Patients with Coagulopathy. Clin. Lab. 2018, 64, 1083–1089.
    17. Warner, M.A.; Hanson, A.C.; Frank, R.D.; Schulte, P.J.; Go, R.S.; Storlie, C.B.; Kor, D.J. Prevalence of and Recovery from Anemia Following Hospitalization for Critical Illness among Adults. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2017843.
    18. Holland J, Peralta RM, Moss RL, Feane K, Uprichard J. A single-centre review of iatrogenic anaemia in adult intensive care. Transfus Med 2020;30(3):196-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/ tme.126740
    19. HT Lalthanthuami, MJ Kumari, R Venkateswaran, PR Lakshmi, Lakshmi Ramamoorthy, Performance of 3 mL versus 5 mL Discarded Volume for Blood Sampling from Central Venous Access Device, J Lab Physicians 2021;13:112–117., DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726669.
    20. Mackenzie CJ, McGowan CM, PincHaemoglobineck G, Carslake haemoglobin. Comparison of two blood sampling techniques for the determination of coagulation parameters in the horse: jugular venipuncture and indwelling intravenous catheter. Equine Vet J 2017; 0:1–6

Background: Frequent and unnecessary sampling could lead to blood loss, which is a major factor causing iatrogenic anaemia. Optimising blood sampling practices could help prevent the need for blood transfusions. Our study aims to assess the blood loss, haemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion requirement due to blood sampling in critical care units. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in the adult critical care units of a tertiary care hospital over three months in Coimbatore, South India. A total of 193 consecutive patients were included by convenience sampling. Blood loss incurred other than blood sampling was observed to negate the bias. Results: Thirty-one (15.8%) patients experienced a significant drop in haemoglobin, and the average blood volume drawn was 87 ml per patient during ICU admission. Patients with invasive catheters incurred higher blood loss and received more blood transfusions (63 units) compared to those with non-invasive catheters (4 units). Unplanned blood samples (stat) were 1186 (9.96 per patient) with invasive catheters. The calculated p-value for blood wastage and transfusion is highly significant (p=0.013). The highly substantial p-values were seen for blood withdrawn between invasive sampling and peripheral sampling per patient and per day (p=0.000 & p=0.00). Conclusion: Our study suggests that reducing the incidence of iatrogenic anaemia and blood transfusion requirements is possible using a closed blood sampling system, especially for sicker patients and those expected to stay for more than 5 days, avoiding unplanned and frequent investigations, using small-volume blood collection tubes, and planned blood sampling timings 12 hours apart as an ICU protocol.

Keywords : Anaemia; Blood Sampling; Blood Transfusion; Hospital-Acquired Anaemia; Intensive Care Unit; Packed Red Blood Cells; Small Volume Tubes.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe