Impact of Cloud Accounting on Organisational Productivity of Some Selected South-West Beverages Companies, Nigeria


Authors : Bolaji, Saudat Adewumi; Adeagbo, Khadijat Ayobami; Owojori, Oluwaseun Christopher

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4wks6bkc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4at7h5ep

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr2016

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : Cloud accounting has emerged as a transformative financial management tool, offering real-time data access, automation, and cost efficiency for modern businesses. This study examines the effect of cloud accounting on organisational productivity in selected South-West beverage companies in Nigeria. The research investigates how cloud-based financial systems impact operational efficiency, financial performance, and decision-making processes compared to traditional accounting methods. A descriptive and causal research design was adopted, utilizing a quantitative approach.. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and tested for reliability by Cronbach’s Alpha. They were distributed to finance managers, accountants, and IT personnel in five (5) selected beverage companies. A stratified random sampling technique was used to ensure diverse representation. Taro Yamane (1967) was adopted to select sample size of 20 respondents. The study applied descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and comparative t-tests to evaluate the relationship between cloud accounting adoption and productivity metrics such as cost reduction, time efficiency, and financial reporting accuracy. Findings revealed that there was strong positive relationship between the variables – Cloud Accounting Adoption and Employees Productivity – Pearson’s r = 0.78 at p < 0.01. Cloud Accounting positively influences decision making processes, β = 0.65 at p < 0.05. Also Companies using cloud accounting report higher efficiency, t = 3.78, p < 0.01. Comparative analysis of the two accounting methods shows a significant difference in their effectiveness in operational performance, t = 4.21, p < 0.01 and that Cloud Accounting contributes 35% more to Productivity. In essence, Cloud accounting outperforms traditional methods in speed, accessibility, security, and scalability. Unlike traditional accounting, cloud-based systems allow multiple users to access financial records simultaneously, automate tax calculations, and integrate with other business systems The study concludes that cloud accounting is a critical driver of organisational productivity in the beverage industry, recommending increased investment in secure cloud infrastructure and staff training for optimal utilization. Further research is suggested to explore industry-specific challenges and long-term financial sustainability of cloud accounting adoption.

Keywords : Cloud Accounting, Organisational Productivity, Financial Performance, Decision-Making, Automation, Cost Efficiency.

References :

  1. Adebayo, S., & Emmanuel, K. (2021). "Cost Efficiency and Time Savings in Cloud Accounting." African Journal of Accounting Research, 18(3), 112-130.
  2. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  4. Barney, J. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  7. Deloitte (2022). "Digital Transformation and Cloud Accounting Adoption." Deloitte Global Financial Insights Report.
  8. Deloitte. (2022). The Impact of Cloud Accounting on Business Efficiency. Deloitte Insights.
  9. Drucker, P. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. HarperBusiness.
  10. Ernst & Young (2021). "AI and Cloud Accounting for Financial Forecasting." EY Business Performance Review.
  11. EY. (2022). Data Security in Cloud Accounting: A Business Perspective. Ernst & Young Publications.
  12. Forbes. (2022). Cloud Technology and Business Growth: A Productivity Analysis. Forbes Business Review.
  13. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
  14. Grant, R. (2022). Financial Technology and Organisational Productivity. Wiley Publications..
  15. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
  16. Harvard Business Review. (2022). Cost Efficiency and Cloud Accounting Adoption in SMEs. Harvard Business Publishing.
  17. Herzberg, F. (2020). Employee Motivation and Productivity in the Digital Age. Harvard Press.
  18. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2012). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson Education.
  19. Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Harvard Business School Press.
  20. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press..
  21. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2020). Strategic Business Management and Cloud Adoption. Pearson.
  22. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2020). Strategic Business Management: The Role of Cloud Technology. Pearson.
  23. KPMG (2021). "Cloud Accounting Security and Compliance: Challenges and Solutions." KPMG Technology Report..
  24. KPMG. (2021). Cybersecurity and Risk Management in Cloud Accounting. KPMG White Paper.
  25. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
  26. Porter, M. (2021). Competitive Advantage and Digital Transformation in Finance. Free Press.
  27. Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467-484.
  28. PwC (2021). "The Role of Cloud-Based Technologies in Organisational Efficiency." PwC Financial Trends Report.
  29. PwC. (2021). The Financial Benefits of Cloud Accounting for SMEs. PwC Global.
  30. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.
  31. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  32. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2010). Corporate Finance (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  33. Schumpeter, J. (2021). Innovation, Business Growth, and Financial Technology. Princeton University Press.
  34. Smith, J., & Watson, R. (2020). "The Impact of Cloud Accounting on Financial Performance." Journal of Financial Technology, 15(2), 45-62.
  35. Smith, T., & Lewis, R. (2020). Maximizing Productivity Through Cloud-Based Financial Solutions. McGraw Hill.
  36. Stiglitz, J. (2022). Economic Growth and Business Expansion through Cloud Technology. Oxford University Press.
  37. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
  38. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  39. Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
  40. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
  41. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  42. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  43. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
  44. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180
  45. Williams, D., & Scott, R. (2021). How Cloud Accounting Drives Organisational Efficiency. Journal of Business Technology.
  46. Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.

Cloud accounting has emerged as a transformative financial management tool, offering real-time data access, automation, and cost efficiency for modern businesses. This study examines the effect of cloud accounting on organisational productivity in selected South-West beverage companies in Nigeria. The research investigates how cloud-based financial systems impact operational efficiency, financial performance, and decision-making processes compared to traditional accounting methods. A descriptive and causal research design was adopted, utilizing a quantitative approach.. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and tested for reliability by Cronbach’s Alpha. They were distributed to finance managers, accountants, and IT personnel in five (5) selected beverage companies. A stratified random sampling technique was used to ensure diverse representation. Taro Yamane (1967) was adopted to select sample size of 20 respondents. The study applied descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and comparative t-tests to evaluate the relationship between cloud accounting adoption and productivity metrics such as cost reduction, time efficiency, and financial reporting accuracy. Findings revealed that there was strong positive relationship between the variables – Cloud Accounting Adoption and Employees Productivity – Pearson’s r = 0.78 at p < 0.01. Cloud Accounting positively influences decision making processes, β = 0.65 at p < 0.05. Also Companies using cloud accounting report higher efficiency, t = 3.78, p < 0.01. Comparative analysis of the two accounting methods shows a significant difference in their effectiveness in operational performance, t = 4.21, p < 0.01 and that Cloud Accounting contributes 35% more to Productivity. In essence, Cloud accounting outperforms traditional methods in speed, accessibility, security, and scalability. Unlike traditional accounting, cloud-based systems allow multiple users to access financial records simultaneously, automate tax calculations, and integrate with other business systems The study concludes that cloud accounting is a critical driver of organisational productivity in the beverage industry, recommending increased investment in secure cloud infrastructure and staff training for optimal utilization. Further research is suggested to explore industry-specific challenges and long-term financial sustainability of cloud accounting adoption.

Keywords : Cloud Accounting, Organisational Productivity, Financial Performance, Decision-Making, Automation, Cost Efficiency.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe