Authors :
Keshaw Kinkar; Meenakshi Ramuji Ingole
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4zc3hr54
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3br47uwd
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1331
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Design thinking is innovative pedagogy emerges to enhance creative problem solving skill. Design thinking
pedagogy based on the user experience and cooperative learning. The objective of present research was to analyze a lesson
plan rooted in the Design Thinking (DT) approach that fosters student comprehension, participation, and problem-solving
in science education. The interpretative qualitative research methodology has been used to analyze the research questions.
Data was collected from 40 middle school learners through observation and reflective journals of learners. Results show that
participation of learners in the classroom enhances the science concepts. Moreover reflective journals reveal that design
thinking pedagogy helps to develop the problem solving skill among students.
Keywords :
Design Thinking, Science Education, Problem Solving.
References :
- Aflatoony, L., Wakkary, R., &Neustaedter, C. (2018). Becoming a Design Thinker: Assessing the Learning Process of Students in a Secondary Level Design Thinking Course. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 438–453.
- Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2024). Using design thinking for developing pre-service teachers’ creativity in designing teaching plans to promote interactive learning in mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 96, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102070
- Alvarado, L. F. (2025). Design thinking as an active teaching methodology in higher education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1462938
- Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., &Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox: Experiences from research and teaching at the university of St.Gallen. In W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel (Eds.), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice (pp. 3–21). Springer Cham.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
- Cross, N. (1982b). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0
- Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2015). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.003.0011
- Ericson, Å., Bergström, M., Larsson, A., & Törlind, P. (2009). Design Thinking Challenges in Education. International Conference on Engineering Design, 89–100. https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/28872/Design+Thinking+Challenges+in+Education
- Foster, M. K. (2019). Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Problem Solving. Management Teaching Review, 6(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298119871468
- Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2017). Student participation and engagement in the classroom. In Handbook of Instructional Communication (2nd Edition, pp. 51–64). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189864-5
- Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K. et al. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. Int J Technol Des Educ 33, 217–240 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z
- Jones, R. C. (2008). The “Why” of class participation: A question worth asking. College Teaching, 56(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.3200/ctch.56.1.59-64
- Juliani, A. J. (2014). Inquiry and innovation in the classroom: Using 20% time, genius hour, and PBL to drive student success. Routledge.
- Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (1996). InterViews: Learning the craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. In the Research Portal (King’s College London). https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/22356d30-d557-11dc-bc43-000ea68e967b
- Lor, R. 2017. Design thinking in education: a critical review of literature. Asian Conference on Education & Psychology, Bangkok, Thailand, 24-26 May. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324684320
- Matthee, M. & Turpin, M. (2019). Invited Paper: Teaching Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Design Thinking: Preparing IS Students for the Future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 30(4), 242-252.https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol30/iss4/5/
- Midler, C., Killen, C. P., &Kock, A. (2016). Project and Innovation Management: Bridging Contemporary Trends in Theory and Practice, Guest Editorial. Project Management Journal, 42(2), 3–7.
- Nguyện, L. C., Hoa, H. Q., & Hien, L. H. P. (2025). Integrating design thinking into STEM education: Enhancing problem-solving skills of high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2611. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16084
- Novo, C., Tramonti, M., Dochshanov, A. M., Tuparova, D., Garkova, B., Eroglan, F., Uğraş, T., Yücel-Toy, B., & De Carvalho, C. V. (2023). Design thinking in Secondary Education: Required teacher skills. Education Sciences, 13(10), 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100969
- Nunes, F.P., Molinari, M., Fialho, A.F., & Santana, C.M. (2021). Design thinking as a tool to the teaching of children, and teachers in the 21st century. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(11), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss11.3478
- Pandit, R., Shastri, I. & Surana, A. (2024). Design Thinking as a Pedagogical Approach in Educational Settings: A Systematic Review. Scope 14(3) 214-235 https://scope-journal.com/publication/2025/September/41/15/3?token=99ff14fde1b9ca67815b124b41c6d9aa&da=0226020926
- Parker, M., Cruz, L., Gachago, D., &Morkel, J. (2021). Design Thinking for Challenges and Change in K–12 and Teacher Education. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 24(1), 3–14.
- Pusca, D. & Northwood, D (2018). Design thinking and its application to problem solving. Global Journal of Engineering Education 20(1), 48-53. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Derek-Northwood/publication/323277797_Design_thinking_and_its_application_to_problem_solving/links/5a9c029caca2721e3f32082a/Design-thinking-and-its-application-to-problem-solving.pdf
- Van Uum, M. S., & Van Der Zanden, P. J. (2025). Group creativity: Divergent and convergent thinking during an inquiry- and design-based project in secondary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101922
- Wippermann, S., & Schmidberger, I. (2023). Innovation in education by design thinking. 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.4995/head23.2023.16097
- Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent Thinking Moderates the Relationship between Divergent Thinking and Scientific Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
Design thinking is innovative pedagogy emerges to enhance creative problem solving skill. Design thinking
pedagogy based on the user experience and cooperative learning. The objective of present research was to analyze a lesson
plan rooted in the Design Thinking (DT) approach that fosters student comprehension, participation, and problem-solving
in science education. The interpretative qualitative research methodology has been used to analyze the research questions.
Data was collected from 40 middle school learners through observation and reflective journals of learners. Results show that
participation of learners in the classroom enhances the science concepts. Moreover reflective journals reveal that design
thinking pedagogy helps to develop the problem solving skill among students.
Keywords :
Design Thinking, Science Education, Problem Solving.