Authors : Juboraj Roy; Prasenjit Ray; Jally Roy

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc886pwz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3yeh4spf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1362

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The introduction of Resource Description and Access (RDA) has marked a significant transformation in the field of cataloguing, redefining how libraries organize, manage, and provide access to information resources. In this study, find out the structure of RDA, implication of RDA, benefit and point out why RDA after AACR2. This study also explores, the chronological way to point out the implementation of strategies, recommendation (Table 2). The study finds out the challenges faced by libraries, including staff training, inadequate infrastructure, administrative support (Table 2). Also find out the Access Points for religious texts is eliminates confusing abbreviations and enhances accessibility in RDA (Table 1). RDA is focusing on its role in enhancing user discovery, metadata flexibility, and integration with linked data technologies.

Keywords : Cataloguing, RDA, FRBR, Linked Data, Semantic Web, FRAD.

References :

1. Anezi Leonard, E., Ugochi Chioma, E., & Damian Chimezie, O. (2022). Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloguing Standard for the Digital Era. Nasarawa Journal of Library and Information Science (NAJLIS), 6.
2. Bargioni, S. (2018). RDA implementation in the URBE network. JLIS.it, 9(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12443
3. Cohen, A. (2016, August). RDA adoption in a multilingual cataloguing environment: The case of Israel. In Proceedings of the IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2016 – “RDA in the Wider World” (pp. 1–12). IFLA. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2050
4. Cronin, C. (2011). From testing to implementation: Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly, 49(7–8), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.623726
5. Chapman, A. (2010). The case of AACR2 versus RDA. Legal Information Management, 10(3), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669610000721
6. Duszak, T. (2006). Goodbye AACR2rev, hello RDA: The new cataloguing code. Catholic Library World, 76(3), 198–199.
7. Dutta, M., & Rahman, Z. (2023). A journey from AACR2 to RDA: A study. [Preprint]. Research Gate.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370073779_A_Journey_from_AACR2_to_RDA:A Study
8. El-Sherbini, M. (2011). Resource Description and Access “RDA”: New code for cataloging. The Serials Librarian, 60(1–4), 7–15. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.556425
9. El-Sherbini, M. (2018). RDA implementation and the emergence of BIBFRAME. JLIS.it, 9(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12441
10. Elrod, J.M. (Mac). (2011). Moving cataloguing rules out of the library: Goodbye, AACR2? In E.R. Sanchez (Ed.), Conversations with cataloguers in the 21st century (pp. 3–12).
11. Hunt, S, (2013). RDA: an innovation in cataloguing, Insights,27(2), 185–189, http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.69
12. Hillmann, D.I., Coyle, K., Phipps, J., & Dunsire, G. (2010). RDA vocabularies: Process, outcome, use. D-Lib Magazine, 16(1/2), 6. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/hillmann/01hillmann.html
13. Kuhagen, J. A., & Mering, M. (2013). RDA and Serials: Theoretical and Practical Applications. The Serials Librarian, 64(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.761051
14. Long, C. E. (2018). RDA implementation in large US public libraries. Library Resources & Technical Services, 62(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.62n3.123
15. Miller, L. (2011). Resource Description and Access (RDA): An introduction for reference librarians. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 240–246. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/rusq/article/download/3947/4433
16. Medeiros, N. (2005). The future of the Anglo-American cataloguing rules. OCLC Systems and Services, 21(4), 261–263.
17. Moore, J.R. (2006). RDA: New cataloging rules, coming soon to a library near you! Library Hi Tech News, 23(9), 12–17.
18. Oliver, C. (2010). Introducing RDA: A Guide to the Basics. Chicago: American Library Association,
19. Panchyshyn, R. S., Lambert, F. P., & McCutcheon, S. (2019). Resource Description and Access adoption and implementation in public libraries in the United States. Library Resources & Technical Services, 63(3), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.63n3.166
20. RDA Toolkit, introduction: http://access.rdatoolkit.org (Retrieved on 8 October. 25)
21. RDA Toolkit. (2020). Resource description and access. https://access.rdatoolkit.org
22. Tosaka, Y., & Park, J. R. (2013). RDA: Resource description & access-A survey of the current state of the art. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 64, Issue 4, pp. 651–662). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22825
23. Tosaka, Y., & Park, J. (2013). RDA: Resource description & access—a survey of the current state of the art. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(11), 2183–2203.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22825
24. Wacker, M., & Han, M.-J. (2013). RDA planning, implementation and use: A comparison of two academic libraries. Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2–3), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826067

25. Yeboah, E. B., Onyancha, O. B., & Mhlongo, M. A. (2025). Readiness of Ghanaian university libraries towards the adoption and implementation of Resource Description and Access. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 33(2), 115–130. https://ajlais.com/index.php/ajlais/article/view/23