Authors : Moumita Sarker Moon; Rajiv Mandal

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2ymz63z5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yj9928yx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct821

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This paper examines the Indo-Saracenic architectural style, specifically as utilised by Sir Edwin Lutyens in the development of New Delhi (1912–1931), to elucidate its role as a deliberate political and symbolic instrument for asserting British imperial supremacy and establishing a visual assertion of historical Indian authority. The research investigates how the architecture, exemplified by the Viceroy's House (Rashtrapati Bhavan), established a manifestation of "hegemonic hybridity". The primary argument claims that Lutyens' design was fundamentally a Western classical structure, with indigenous features—specifically the chhajja, chhatri, and jali—integrated mostly as "superficial ornamentation" or "political concession". This method systematically removed the intricate cultural significances of native aspects, reinterpreting them as generic "Indian touches" to disguise a claim of logical, Western authority. The outcome was an aesthetic domination, characterised by a European structural framework complemented by Indian artistic adornment. Additionally, significant elements such as the Jaipur Column conveyed a distinct sense of "narrative subjugation" within the imperial environment.

Keywords : Colonial Architecture, Symbolic Significance, Visual Arts Narrative.

References :

1. Irving, R. G. (1981). Indian Summer: Lutyens, Baker, and Imperial Delhi. Yale University Press.
2. Volwahsen, A. (2007). Imperial Delhi: The End of History. Prestel.
3. Metcalf, T. R. (1989). An Imperial Vision: Indian Architecture and Britain's Raj. University of California Press.
4. Davies, P. (1989). Splendours of the Raj: British Architecture in India, 1660-1947. Penguin Books.
5. King, A. D. (1976). Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Kalia, R. (1987). Chandigarh: In Search of an Identity. Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Guha Thakurta, T. (1992). The Making of a New 'Indian' Art: Artists, Aesthetics and Nationalism in Bengal, c. 1850–1920. Cambridge University Press.
8. Frampton, K. (1980). Modern Architecture: A Critical History. Thames and Hudson.
9. Evenson, N. (1989). The Indian Metropolis: A View Toward the West. Yale University Press.
10. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press.
11. Guha-Thakurta, T. (2004). Monuments, Objects, Histories: Institutions of Art in Colonial and Postcolonial India. Columbia University Press.
12. Mitter, P. (1994). Art and Nationalism in Colonial India, 1850-1922: Occidental Orientations. Cambridge University Press.
13. Jaja, M. A. (2013). A Passage to India: The Colonial Discourse and The Representation of India and Indians as stereotypes. Gomal University Journal of Research 29.1.
14. Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism / Postcolonialism. Ed. 3rd, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York.