Authors : Akshay S Pillai; Dr. V.R. Pramod

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mry9z7u9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/454xfsax

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1357

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study investigates the quality issues in the production of aluminum biryani vessels, which are widely used for cooking biryani across various locations. The absence of well-defined production strategies has been identified as a key factor affecting the quality of these vessels. The research highlights the lack of identification and prioritization of essential technical requirements in the production process. By employing Quality Function Deployment (QFD) as a tool, the study effectively identifies and prioritizes these technical requirements for the aluminum biryani vessel industry. A detailed analysis of a leading aluminum biryani vessel production company in Kerala reveals that the critical technical requirements, in order of priority, include optimal sheet thickness, good surface polishing, proper condensation of molten metal, effective heat treatment, surface machining, accurate drilling, reduced sheet metal weight, selection of quality handle material, proper riveting, appropriate pressure on the hydraulic press, adequate pressure and gap between rolls, periodic design updates, attractive vessel shape, reduced handle weight, efficient grip pattern, hydraulic punch speed, and correct labelling. Adherence to these priorities in the production process is expected to significantly enhance the quality and productivity of aluminum biryani vessels.

Keywords : QFD, TPM, TQM, MQFD, TQFD, FMEA, CRM, Customer Language, Technical Language, HoQ, CTI, CWTL.

References :

1. .J Pulikkottil, “Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) In Aluminium Pot Manufacturing Industry with TPM Pillars,” 2019
2. E.Arslan,W. Mack  and T.U.N.C Apatay,  “Thermo-mechanically loaded steel/aluminum functionally graded spherical containers and pressure vessels”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 191, 104334, 2021
3. M.Tasavori, A.T.Maleki and I.Ahmadi,  “Composite coating effect on stress intensity factors of aluminum pressure vessels with inner circumferential crack by X-FEM”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 194, 104445, 2021
4. A.M.Oddershede,L.E. Quezada, J.E Valenzuela, P.I. Palominos and H.Lopez-Ospina, “Formulation of a manufacturing strategy using the house of quality”,  Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 843-850, 2019
5. A.Kumar, J.Antony and T.S.Dhakar, “Integrating quality function deployment and benchmarking to achieve greater profitability”,  Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(3), 290-310, 2006
6. V.R.Pramod, S.R Devadasan, S. Muthu and V.P.Jagathy Raj, “MQFD: a model for synergising TPM and QFD”. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 1(2), 176-200, 2006
7. S.R.Devadasan, N.Kathiravan and V.Thirunavukkarasu,“Theory and practice of total quality function deployment: A perspective from a traditional pump‐manufacturing environment.” The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 143-161, 2006
8. B.Almannai, R. Greenough,  and J.Kay, “A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24(4), 501-507,2008
9. A.Shahin and P.Nikneshan, “Integration of CRM and QFD: a novel model for enhancing customer participation in design and delivery”, The TQM Journal, 20(1), 68-86, 2008
10. C.K.Kwong, Y.Chen, H.Bai, and D.S.K.Chan,“ A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QFD”,  Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(4), 667-679, 2007.