Improved Model for Predicting Water Production in a Typical Dry Gas Well


Authors : Ebifagha Bebenimibo; Victor Joseph Aimikhe

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/24bj9fsd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bddb6fbb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1436

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Water production is a major challenge in many gas wells leading to a substantial reduction in the net gas deliverability, high operational costs associated with large-scale water separation facilities, increased energy consumption for lifting fluids, and significant logistical and regulatory burden of produced water disposal. This study focused on the development of a more accurate model for predicting and diagnosing water production in dry gas wells to enhance reservoir management and optimize production strategies. The model was developed by investigating the effectiveness of various machine learning models in predicting water production rates from dry gas wells using data sourced from Niger Delta. Five algorithms were trained and validated on a dataset comprising 249 daily records across eight dry gas wells in three reservoirs. The results showed CatBoost as an effective tool for petroleum reservoir forecasting demonstrating its superiority over widely used algorithms such as Random Forest, XGBoost, KNN and Support Vector Regression in predicting water production. Furthermore, the model predictions revealed that permeability had the strongest positive correlation with water production, whereas reservoir temperature and dew point pressure exhibited significant negative correlations. Overall, the findings underscore the superiority of ensemble-based models in capturing the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the Niger Delta field data. The developed predictive model is crucial for engineers to size equipment properly and avoid both under-capacity (leading to facility bottlenecks) and over-design (leading to wasted capital). Further research will focus on expanding the dataset to include a wider range of operational and reservoir parameters to enhance the model robustness and applicability.

Keywords : Liquid Loading, Water Production, Machine Learning, Dry Gas Wells, Modelling.

References :

  1. Khatib, Z., & Verbeek, P. (2003). Water to value - Produced water management for sustainable field development of mature and green fields. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.2118/0103-0026-JPT
  2. Gao, S., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Ye, L., Zhu, W., & Xiong, W. (2023). Water-gas ratio characteristics and development concepts for water-producing gas reservoirs. In Heliyon (Vol. 9, Issue 8). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19201
  3. Aimikhe V.J and Adeyemi M.A (2019). A Critical Evaluation of Natural Gas-water Formula Correlations. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports. 25(6): 1-20
  4. Radwan, M. F. (2017). Feasibility evaluation of using downhole gas-water separation technology in gas reservoirs with bottom water. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, MEOS, Proceedings, 2017-March. https://doi.org/10.2118/183739-ms
  5. Wei, M., Ren, K., Duan, Y., Chen, Q., & Dejam, M. (2019). Production decline behavior analysis of a vertical well with a natural water influx/waterflood. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1683989
  6. Bin Marta, Hammouda, Tantawy, Khamis, & Wahba. (2023a). Diagnosing and Controlling Excessive Water Production: State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering,0(0),0–0. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2023.233102.
  7. Falcon, & Barbosa (2013). State-of-the-art Review of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells. DGMK.
  8. Joseph, A., & Ajienka, J. A. (2010). A review of water shutoff treatment strategies in oil fields. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition 2010, NAICE, 1. https://doi.org/10.2118/136969-ms
  9. Roozshenas, A. A., Hematpur, H., Abdollahi, R., & Esfandyari, H. (2021). Water Production Problem in Gas Reservoirs: Concepts, Challenges, and Practical Solutions. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9075560
  10. Francis, M., & Ogbeide, P. O. (2021). Application of Chan Plot in Water Control Diagnostics for Field Optimization: Water/Gas Coning and Cusping. NIPES - Journal of Science and Technology Research, 3(4), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.37933/nipes/3.4.2021.23x
  11. Guo, B., & Lee, R. L. H. (1993). Simple approach to optimization of completion interval in oil/water coning systems. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 8(4). https://doi.org/10.2118/23994-pa
  12. Okwananke, A., & Isehunwa, S. O. (2008). Analysis of Water Cresting in Horizontal Wells. SPE 119733.
  13. Pirson, S. J., & Mehta, M. M. (1967). A Study of Remedial Measures for Water-Coning By Means of a Two-Dimensional Simulator. https://doi.org/10.2118/1808-ms
  14. Inikori, S. (2002). Numerical study of water coning control with Downhole Water Sink (DWS) completions in vertical and horizontal wells. https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations
  15. Reynolds, R. R. (2003). Produced Water and Associated Issues. Oklahoma Geological Survey.
  16. Muskat, M., & Wycokoff, R. D. (1935). An Approximate Theory of Water-coning in Oil Production. Transactions of the AIME, 114(01). https://doi.org/10.2118/935144-g
  17. Chaperon, I. (1986). Theoretical study of coning toward horizontal and vertical wells in anisotropic formations: Subcritical and critical rates. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2523/15377-ms
  18. Fetkovich, M. J., Reese, D. E., & Whitson, C. H. (1999). Application of a general material balance for high-pressure gas reservoirs. SPE Reprint Series, 52.
  19. Nmegbu, G., Festus Awara, L., Bariakpoa Kinate, B., Cgj, N., Festus, L., & Bariakpoa KINATE, B. (2020). Diagnosis and Control of Excessive Water Production in Niger Delta Oil Wells. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 9(10). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345682999
  20. Guo, B., Lyons, W. C., & Ghalambor, A. (2007). Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach. In Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8270-1.X5000-2
  21. Poe, B. D. (2003). Production Diagnostic Analyses with Incomplete or No Pressure Records. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/84224-ms
  22. Yortsos, Y. C., Choi, Y., Yang, Z., & Shah, P. C. (1999). Analysis and interpretation of water/oil ratio in waterfloods. SPE Journal, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.2118/59477-PA
  23. Da Silva, D. V. A., & Jansen, J. D. (2015). A Review of Coupled Dynamic Well-Reservoir Simulation. 2nd IFAC Workshop on Automatic Control in Offshore Oil and Gas Production, May 27-29, Florianópolis, Brazil
  24. Rabiei, M., Gupta, R., Cheong, Y. P., & Soto, G. A. S. (2009). Excess water production diagnosis in oil fields using ensemble classifiers. Proceedings - 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, CiSE 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5362732
  25. Ha, J., Kambe, M., & Pe, J. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. In Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-61819-5

Water production is a major challenge in many gas wells leading to a substantial reduction in the net gas deliverability, high operational costs associated with large-scale water separation facilities, increased energy consumption for lifting fluids, and significant logistical and regulatory burden of produced water disposal. This study focused on the development of a more accurate model for predicting and diagnosing water production in dry gas wells to enhance reservoir management and optimize production strategies. The model was developed by investigating the effectiveness of various machine learning models in predicting water production rates from dry gas wells using data sourced from Niger Delta. Five algorithms were trained and validated on a dataset comprising 249 daily records across eight dry gas wells in three reservoirs. The results showed CatBoost as an effective tool for petroleum reservoir forecasting demonstrating its superiority over widely used algorithms such as Random Forest, XGBoost, KNN and Support Vector Regression in predicting water production. Furthermore, the model predictions revealed that permeability had the strongest positive correlation with water production, whereas reservoir temperature and dew point pressure exhibited significant negative correlations. Overall, the findings underscore the superiority of ensemble-based models in capturing the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the Niger Delta field data. The developed predictive model is crucial for engineers to size equipment properly and avoid both under-capacity (leading to facility bottlenecks) and over-design (leading to wasted capital). Further research will focus on expanding the dataset to include a wider range of operational and reservoir parameters to enhance the model robustness and applicability.

Keywords : Liquid Loading, Water Production, Machine Learning, Dry Gas Wells, Modelling.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - January - 2026

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe