Authors : Cesar Kamel; Richard Beainy; Miriam Bteish

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4ypb3wjp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/cfkwuud5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct233

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Should you find the notion of the United States of America having the ability to print money without gold reserves seemingly unjust from a subjective standpoint, this study aims to provide an objective examination. Despite subjective opinions, it is imperative for scholars to acknowledge, if not endorse and support, the prevailing world order orchestrated by the United States and its western counterparts. This research offers compelling reasons why, irrespective of its fairness, any scholar with a modicum of logic and alternative analysis should recognize the real importance of the existing global framework in addition to the financial system, as even with imperfections, the western world operates under democratic principles, contrasting with the alternative of Chinese communism. According to this study, the current world order is characterized by stability. The alternative, if not order, is the potential descent into chaos, which according to quantitative data presented by the study, will impact far beyond the United States’ borders: through quantitative analysis, the study demonstrates the potential global consequences of alternative economic systems, particularly the risk of widespread chaos if the current order were to collapse. This research contributes valuable insights into the complex interplay between economic systems, political ideologies, and global stability, offering a foundation for informed policy discussions.

Keywords : Current World Order, the U S Dollar, Financial system, Debt, Currency.

References :

1. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/97-trillion-of-global-debt-in-2023/
2. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/dedollarization-is-not-just-geopolitics-economic-fundamentals-matter/
3. https://publications.banque-france.fr/en/capital-account-convertibility-required-renminbi-acquire-reserve-currency-status
4. https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/12/05/difficult-realities-of-brics-dedollarization-efforts-and-renminbi-s-role-pub-91173
5. Bruno Venditti, (March 31, 2023) https://www.visualcapitalist.com/de-dollarization-countries-seeking-alternatives-to-the-u-s-dollar/econpol-forum-2024-1-herrero-brics-enlargement.pdf
6. How to Destroy the Liberal International Order.pdf
7. https://globaleurope.eu/globalization/brics-the-global-south-challenging-the-status-quo/
8. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/ddgae_03dec21_e.htm/
9. https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2023/03/27/the-brics-has-overtaken the-g7-in-global-gdp/.
10. https://www.ft.com/content/83a521c0-6abb-4efa-be48-89ecb52c8d01/
11. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/debt-external/country-comparison/
12. https://data.imf.org/?sk=e6a5f467-c14b-4aa8-9f6d-5a09ec4e62a4
13. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022-registration-confirmation
14. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
15. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/public-debt/
16. Arthur, W. B. (1994). "Positive feedbacks in the economy." The McKinsey Quarterly (1): 81-96.
17. Beainy, R. H. (2023). "Economic Growth, the Case of Developed and Developing Economies." PhD diss., Holy Spirit University of Kaslik.
18. Beainy, R. H. and C. A. Kamel (2023). "Finance for Life Instead of Death." Migration Letters 20(6): 1051-1060.
19. Beainy, R. H. and J. K. Kamel (2023). "The Importance of Technology, R&D and AI in the US Economy." Migration Letters 20(8): 573-584.
20. Chris, D.-E. (2023). "The BRICS Has Overtaken the G7 In Global GDP." Silk Road Briefing 27.
21. Cochrane, J. H. (2009). "Lessons from the financial crisis." Regulation 32: 34.
22. David, P. A. (1985). "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, 75AM." Econ. Rev 332: 335-336.
23. Druzin, B. H. (2021). "Tipping Points and the Formation of the European Union: Birth, Brexit, and Beyond." Colum. J. Eur. L. 27: 68.
24. Druzin, B. H. (2023). "How to Destroy the Liberal International Order." Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 34: 1.
25. Duesterberg, T. J. (2019). "The importance of WTO reform from a transatlantic perspective." Hudson Institute 22.
26. Eichengreen, B. (2011). Exorbitant Privilege: The rise and fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System, Oxford University Press.
27. García Herrero, A. (2024). Potential geoeconomic and geopolitical consequences of an expanded BRICS. EconPol Forum, Munich: CESifo GmbH.
28. Gasbarri, L. (2021). "The notion of institutional practice in United Nations Law." Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 24(1): 1-35.
29. Graham, T. (2024). Europe—Whither Bound? BoD-Books on Demand.
30. Grewal, D. S. (2008). Network power: The social dynamics of globalization, Yale University Press.
31. Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). "The end of liberal international order?" International Affairs 94(1): 7-23.
32. James, H. (2023). Seven crashes: The economic crises that shaped globalization, Yale University Press.
33. Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro (1985). "Network externalities, competition, and compatibility." The American economic review 75(3): 424-440.
34. Mazarr, M. J. (2017). "The once and future order: what comes after hegemony." Foreign Aff. 96: 25.
35. Rahman, M. (2002). World economic issues at the United Nations: Half a century of debate, Springer Science & Business Media.
36. Wolf, M. (2021). "Containing China is not a feasible option." Financial Times 2.