Influences Personalisation and Student Engagement in the AI Era: Exploring Effects and Influences


Authors : Sara Benayache; Bouchrik Mourad

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4cc8hnb3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2c5nwjdf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1667

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The study is based on a conceptual model to examine the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education and their impact on student engagement. This model structures the analysis around several axes: AI technologies, including intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), adaptive learning platforms, and educational chatbots, play a key role in personalizing learning paths, making pedagogical support more accessible, and adapting content to students' specific needs. Student engagement is thus assessed through the personalization of pathways and the accessibility of support, while taking into account individual moderating factors such as learning styles, self-motivation, and prior experience with AI technologies, which influence the effectiveness of these tools. In addition, the study examines contextual conditions, including the importance of adequate technological infrastructure and teacher training, which are essential for the successful integration of AI technologies into pedagogical practices. This conceptual model guides the study in evaluating the assumptions made, providing an in-depth understanding of the interactions between these variables and making recommendations to optimize the use of AI technologies in education.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence (AI)- Student Engagement- Personalization- Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)- Adaptive Learning Platforms- Educational Chatbots- Teacher Training.

References :

  1. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Effective Instructional Agents: Lessons Learned from an Intelligent Tutor. International Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 159-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0075-6
  2. Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2019). Exploration de données éducatives et analyse de l'apprentissage. Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, 253-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781108679934.015
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman.
  4. Boughzala, I., & Boughzala, Y. (2019). Leveraging Learning Analytics and Intelligent Tutoring Systems to Improve Academic Performance: An Overview and Future Directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 91-103. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/26865721
  5. Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2021). Effects of previous experience with learning technologies on academic performance. Computers & Education, 165, 104143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104143
  6. Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2018). Designing Learning Systems with AI: A Case Study on the Use of AI in Educational Research. Research and Development in Educational Technology, 66(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9552-3
  7. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Technological change in teachers: how knowledge, trust, beliefs and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  8. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Technological change in teachers: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture shape the integration of technology. Research and Development in Educational Technology, 58(2), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9192-y
  9. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  10. Gholson, B., & Craig, S. D. (2006). The effects of a smart tutoring system on learning and engagement in the classroom. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0066-7
  11. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Centre for the redesign of programmes.
  12. Jones, A., & Brown, M. (2019). Adaptive learning technologies and their effectiveness. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 134-150.
  13. Kaufman, J. H., & Flanagan, D. P. (2011). L'influence des styles d'apprentissage sur l'efficacité des technologies d'apprentissage adaptatif. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9198-1
  14. Khosravi, H., & Cooper, M. (2020). The effectiveness of adaptive learning technologies in improving educational outcomes: a systematic review. Research and Development in Educational Technology, 68(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09643-2
  15. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00168-7
  16. Kostons, D., Van der Meer, J., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). The effects of adaptive learning on motivation and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.edurev.2011.09.001
  17. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning [MALL]: The role of chatbots in language education. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2020.102339
  18. Liu, S., Liu, M., & Lee, M. (2018). The effects of infrastructure on the integration of technology in education: A study of schools in urban and rural areas. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117705402
  19. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: A Case for AI in Education. Pearson.
  20. Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge Handbook on Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Molenaar, I., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Computers in education: An overview of the use of learning analytics for improving academic performance. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11423-008-9113-7
  22. Mouza, C., Yang, H., Wang, T., & Pollock, M. (2016). Examining the impact of technology professional development on teachers' use of technology in classrooms: The role of teachers' beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 15-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23612892
  23. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
  24. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842470
  25. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-32. https://er.educause.edu/ articles/2011/9/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education
  26. Smith, D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The impact of student technology use on academic performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.3.d
  27. Smith, J. (2020). Innovations in adaptive learning technologies. Educational Research Review, 22(1), 45-59.
  28. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37-76.
  29. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.610313
  30. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
  31. Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018a). Unifying the role of chatbots in educational contexts: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 793-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11423-018-9590-3
  32. Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018b). Unifying technology acceptance and task-technology fit: The case of chatbots at the workplace. Journal of Information Technology, 33(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396217722534
  33. Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2021). Education governance and the use of educational data and artificial intelligence. In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research (pp. 321-335). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529715818.n20

The study is based on a conceptual model to examine the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education and their impact on student engagement. This model structures the analysis around several axes: AI technologies, including intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), adaptive learning platforms, and educational chatbots, play a key role in personalizing learning paths, making pedagogical support more accessible, and adapting content to students' specific needs. Student engagement is thus assessed through the personalization of pathways and the accessibility of support, while taking into account individual moderating factors such as learning styles, self-motivation, and prior experience with AI technologies, which influence the effectiveness of these tools. In addition, the study examines contextual conditions, including the importance of adequate technological infrastructure and teacher training, which are essential for the successful integration of AI technologies into pedagogical practices. This conceptual model guides the study in evaluating the assumptions made, providing an in-depth understanding of the interactions between these variables and making recommendations to optimize the use of AI technologies in education.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence (AI)- Student Engagement- Personalization- Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)- Adaptive Learning Platforms- Educational Chatbots- Teacher Training.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe