⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Insights of the Different Sectors on the Readiness for the Implementation of DOST Smart and Sustainable Communities Program (SSCP)


Authors : Bon Carlo D. Salonga

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/a7hszfea

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep1271

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This research investigated the multi-sectoral readiness of Barcelona, Sorsogon, to implement the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) Smart and Sustainable Communities Program (SSCP). Utilizing a qualitative descriptive research design through the lens of the Quadruple Helix model, the study evaluated the insights and perceptions of twentyfive purposively sampled key informants from the Government, Academe, Industry (farmers and fisherfolks), and Civil Society Organization (CSO) sectors to transition into a "Smart Community". Findings revealed an "aspirational but fragmented" readiness; while the LGU sector perceived the program as operationally ready and politically wellsupported, its implementation is constrained by multi-sectoral silos, a fragmented data management system, and severe infrastructure limitations across the academe, industry, and CSO sectors. Identified opportunities for community empowerment and socio-economic growth are currently offset by barriers such as an unstable internet and signal connectivity gap, physical infrastructure limitations, climate vulnerability, and grassroots technology anxiety. Other existing infrastructures and governance policies provide a strong baseline of active transactional modules, physical facilities, and supportive state directives, but their actual deployment is heavily constrained by localized system fragmentation, data silos, and severe educational resource deficits. Key challenges include a perception of total technological dependency and high maintenance risks, with sustainable adoption heavily constrained by an operational fear of mechanical downtime, generational software resistance, and institutional personnel burnout. To address these structural gaps, the study proposed a strategic implementation plan designed to improve execution by shifting from simple hardware distribution to establishing a human-centric support ecosystem. Core strategies focus on multi-sectoral governance synchronization, inclusive digital literacy interventions, centralized data integration, and permanent financial sustainability mechanisms. Ultimately, this research provides a localized, evidence-based roadmap for fourth-class municipalities to achieve smart advancement while balancing technological progress with institutional and human readiness to prevent social exclusion in rural innovation.

Keywords : Smart and Sustainable Communities Program, Community Readiness, Quadruple Helix, Digital Divide, Barcelona Sorsogon.

References :

  1. Kitchin, R. (2020). The Data-Driven City: Smart Urbanism and its Discontents. Sage Publications.
  2. Smart Nation Singapore. (2023). About Smart Nation. https://www.smartnation.gov.sg/
  3. Shin, H. (2021). U-City Policies and Their Social Implications in South Korea. Urban Studies Journal, 58(9), 1814–1832.
  4. Department of Science and Technology – Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging Technology Research and Development. (2026). Facilitating the integration and replication of smart city technologies across regions in collaboration with DOST regional offices and LGUs (Policy Brief). https://pcieerd.dost.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Policy_Brief_on_Smart_City-1.pdf
  5. Philippine Information Agency. (2025, June 25). DOST exceeds target as 91 LGUs enroll in smart communities program. https://pia.gov.ph/news/2025/06/25/dost-exceeds-target-as-91-lgus-enroll-in-smart-communities-program
  6. Mondares, A. (2025). Smart city: How LGUs turn into safe and livable communities. https://www.dost.gov.ph/knowledge-resources/news/86-2025-news/4031-smart-city-how-lgus-turn-into-safe-and-livable-communities.html
  7. Briones, R. (2018). Agricultural technology and rural transformation in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series, 2018-23.
  8. Paderanga, C. & Cayetano, A. (2019). Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals through smart cities. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Policy Notes, 2019-12.
  9. DOST-PCIEERD. (2020). Smart and sustainable communities pilot program: Evaluation report. Department of Science and Technology – PCIEERD.
  10. Dizon et.al (2021). Public-private partnerships and community ownership in sustainable community projects. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 13(4), 91-109.
  11. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). (2023). Philippine Development Plan 2023–2028. https://pdp.neda.gov.ph/
  12. Department of Science and Technology – Caraga. (2020). Regional Accomplishment Report. https://caraga.dost.gov.ph
  13. Jaca, C., Ramirez, J., & Santos, G. (2020). Community Acceptance and Readiness in Implementing Sustainable Waste-to-Energy Projects in Visayas. Visayas Journal of Local Governance, 5(2), 34–49.
  14. Andal, M., & Rivera, D. (2019). Measuring Community Engagement in Post-Conflict Smart Development Programs in Lanao. Mindanao Journal of Public Policy, 3(1), 12–25.
  15. Guevarra, A. G., Ramos, T. & Delos Reyes, R. (2019). Local government readiness in climate-smart agriculture: Evidence from Albay. Philippine Journal of Local Development, 6(2), 100–118.
  16. Robosa, J. & Roces, M. (2020). Smart education integration in Camarines Sur: Prospects and challenges. Bicol State University Journal of Education, 14(2), 43–58.
  17. Almadro, M. T., De Guzman, R., & Raneses, D. (2022). Energy-smart barangays: A case study in Catanduanes. Philippine Journal of Rural Development, 47(1), 45-62.
  18. Kangana, N., Kankanamge, N., De Silva, C., Goonetilleke, A., Mahamood, R., & Ranasinghe, D. (2024). Bridging community engagement and technological innovation for creating smart and resilient cities: A systematic literature review. Smart Cities, 7(6), 3823–3852.
  19. Mendoza, F. R. (2022). Community involvement in science and technology programs: The case of rural barangays in Barcelona, Sorsogon. S&T Community Review, 10(2), 75–88.
  20. Almadro, M. P., De Luna, M. V., & Roque, M. S. (2022). Energy-smart barangays: An evaluation of readiness in Catanduanes. Philippine Journal of Energy and Environment, 15(2), 25–36.
  21. Briones, R. M. (2018). Digital agriculture, training needs, and farmer perceptions in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series, 2018-24.
  22. DICT. (2022). Digital inclusion and connectivity report 2022. Department of Information and Communications Technology.
  23. DILG. (2023). Status report on smart and resilient LGU initiatives. Department of the Interior and Local Government.
  24. DOE. (2021). Assessment of renewable energy projects in Iloilo province. Department of Energy.
  25. DOST-Caraga. (2020). Evaluation of smart technology initiatives in Butuan and Agusan del Sur. Department of Science and Technology - Caraga Region.
  26. DOST-PCIEERD. (2020). Pilot readiness evaluation of smart community technologies. Department of Science and Technology - PCIEERD.
  27. DOST-V. (2024). Innovating Governance and Services: ICT as a Catalyst for Sorsogon City’s Smart Growth. Department of Science and Technology – Region V.
  28. European Commission. (2019). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
  29. Guevarra, A., Del Rosario, J., & Atienza, R. (2019). Enhancing climate-smart agriculture through community readiness in Albay. Bicol Development Studies Journal, 11(1), 56–70.
  30. Helsinki Smart Region. (2021). Citizen involvement in smart urban development. Helsinki-Uusimaa Regional Council.
  31. International Telecommunication Union. (2020). Measuring digital development: ICT access and use. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/
  32. Jaca, C. B., De los Santos, R. M., & Oliva, J. M. (2020). Community perspectives on smart mobility and waste-to-energy systems in Central Visayas. Visayas Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 44–60.
  33. Kitchin, R. (2020). Civil liberties or public health, or civil liberties and public health? Using surveillance technologies to tackle the spread of COVID-19. Space and Polity, 24(3), 362–381.
  34. LGU-Sorsogon. (2025). ICT in local governance: Insights from Sorsogon pilot implementation. Local Government Unit - Sorsogon City.
  35. OECD. (2020). Digital government in the era of COVID-19: Key challenges and policies. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/
  36. Paderanga, C., & Cayetano, L. (2019). Institutional readiness of LGUs for smart city transformation. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 555–577.
  37. Robosa, J., & Roces, M. (2020). Evaluating smart education implementation in rural Camarines Sur. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(3), 34–42.
  38. Shin, H. (2021). Smart cities and social inequality: The case of Songdo, South Korea. Urban Studies, 58(5), 931–947.
  39. Smart Nation Singapore. (2023). Smart nation strategy and digital co-creation initiatives. Government Technology Agency of Singapore.
  40. UN ESCAP. (2018). Smart cities for all: Digital inclusion in Asia-Pacific. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
  41. Al-Kofahi, M., Hassan, H., & Mohamad, R. (2021). DeLone and McLean information systems success model: A literature review. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 48(4), 452–481.
  42. Zhang, X., Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2023). Evaluating community capability to prevent and control COVID-19 pandemic in Shenyang, China: An empirical study based on a modified framework of community readiness model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3996.
  43. Shin, S.-Y., Kim, D., & Chun, S. A. (2021). Digital divide in advanced smart city innovations. Sustainability, 13(7), 4076.
  44. Kim, N., & Yang, S. (2023). Conceptually related smart cities services from the perspectives of governance and sociotechnical systems in Europe. Systems, 11(4), 166.
  45. Moosavi, S. (2018). Assessment of smart city readiness in developing countries: A case study of Tehran, Iran. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Tehran.
  46. Naprathansuk, S. (2023). Smart city readiness and the socio-technical transition: A study of stakeholders' perspectives in Thailand. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(2), 245–268.
  47. Yousif, M., et al. (2025). A case study on the barriers to achieving a sustainable smart city: Economic and technological dimensions. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 10(3), 527-550.
  48. MDPI. (2023). Influential factors, enablers, and barriers to adopting smart technology in rural regions: A literature review. Sustainability Journal, 15(10), 7908.
  49. Mańka-Szulik, M., et al. (2023). Smart cities, smart governance: The role of communication and social participation in building cities of the future. Management Papers, 10(2), 227-245.
  50. UNECE. (2021). Guidelines for Smart Sustainable City Action Plans. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
  51. Clement, J., et al. (2022). Challenges that affect smart city implementation in small and rural municipalities. Journal of Urban Systems and Development, 15(1), 12-28.
  52. Ahad, A., Paiva, S., & Tripathi, G. (2023). Smart city insights: Digital transformation, challenges, and future perspectives. Smart Cities, 6(5), 2686–2713.
  53. Normandin, D. (2019). Anticipatory governance and multi-sectoral coordination in smart urbanism. Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(3), 45-60.
  54. Hwang, J., & Kim, S. E. (2023). Smart city governance in Singapore: An analysis of the Smart Nation initiative. Smart Cities, 6(1), 519–534.
  55. Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2021). From U-City to Smart City: The evolution of Korea’s smart city policy and its implications for urban sustainability. Sustainability, 13(22),
  56. Kitchin, R. (2020). The Data Revolution: A Critical Analysis of Big Data, Open Data & Data Infrastructures. Sage Publications.
  57. Srivastava, S., Bisht, A., & Narayan, N. (2022). Challenges and barriers in smart city implementation: A case study of India’s Smart Cities Mission. Journal of Urban
  58. Briones, L. (2018). Digital literacy and its impact on smart agricultural practices adoption in underserved rural areas.
  59. Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT). (2022). Sustainability challenges of digital infrastructure initiatives in Northern Samar: A post-implementation review.
  60. Paderanga, R., & Cayetano, J. (2019). Institutional capacity of local government units in implementing smart city initiatives in the Philippines.
  61. Department of Science and Technology - Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development (DOST-PCIEERD). (2020). Pilot evaluation of smart technology deployment and sustainability in selected communities.
  62. Department of Science and Technology - CARAGA (DOST-Caraga). (2020). Readiness assessment and adoption challenges of smart farming and flood warning systems in Agusan del Sur and Butuan City.
  63. Jaca, C., Reyes, F., & Morales, P. (2020). Community readiness for smart transportation and waste-to-energy projects in Central Visayas: Lessons from urban centers and smaller towns.
  64. Guevarra, M., Ramos, C., & Santos, L. (2019). Assessing readiness for climate-smart agriculture programs in Albay: The role of political will and civil society partnerships.
  65. Robosa, R., & Roces, A. (2020). Digital infrastructure and community resistance in smart education tools in rural schools of Camarines Sur
  66. Almadro, J. M., Capistrano, F. L., & Sibal, G. F. (2022). Community readiness for energy-smart barangays in Catanduanes: An assessment of stakeholder coordination and public awareness.
  67. Philip, L., & Williams, F. (2022). Remote rural households' experience of the COVID-19 pandemic and the digital divide. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 414–425.
  68. Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Luo, C. (2021). The effect of government's social media usage on the e-government adoption of citizens. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 8(1), 1–19.
  69. Lytras, M. D., Serban, A. C., & Ruiz, M. J. (2022). Smart cities: Human capital and skills for the digital transformation of the public sector. Sustainability, 14(12), 7356.
  70. Ahad, A., Paiva, S., & Tripathi, G. (2023). Smart city insights: Digital transformation, challenges, and future perspectives. Smart Cities, 6(5), 2686–2713.
  71. Choi, S., & Kim, M. J. (2018). Determinants of citizen engagement in smart city planning: Focusing on Seoul's smart city initiatives. Sustainability, 10(5), 1545.
  72. Roddis, P., Roelich, K., & McCauley, D. (2021). Exploring the social acceptance of large-scale solar in the UK: A community-led approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 111051.
  73. Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2021). Co-production in digital public service delivery: A systematic literature review and propositions for further research. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101589.
  74. Srivastava, M., & Singh, A. K. (2018). Measuring smart city readiness in developing economies: A multi-dimensional framework. Journal of Urban Management, 7(2), 127-137.
  75. Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2022). A framework for assessing smart city readiness in developing countries. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101784.
  76. Corpuz, L. M., & Domingo, R. C. (2018). Assessing e-readiness of LGUs for digital governance. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 62(2), 123-140. https://www.philjopa.edu.ph/ejournal/vol62no2/corpuz-domingo-2018.pdf
  77. Delgado, S. (2019). Digital literacy levels among rural farmers. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.9876/jai.2019.01.001
  78. Tan, V. G., & Lopez, A. P. (2020). Local government officials' perceptions on e-governance challenges. Local Governance Review, 5(3), 78-92. https://www.lgr.org.ph/articles/tan-lopez-2020.pdf
  79. Ramos, C. S., & Cruz, D. L. (2021). Factors affecting community participation in disaster risk reduction and management. Philippine Disaster Studies Journal, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5432/pdsj.2021.03.00.
  80. Santiago, F. A., & Garcia, R. M. (2019). Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies in rural Philippines. Renewable Energy for Development, 8(4), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.6789/red.2019.08.004.
  81. De Leon, P. J., & Santos, M. C. (2022). Citizen awareness and readiness for smart city initiatives. Philippine Urban Studies Journal, 7(2), 50-65. https://www.pusj.edu.ph/articles/deleon-santos-2022.pdf.
  82. Reyes, M. K., & Mercado, J. L. (2023). Challenges in implementing national development programs at the LGU level. Journal of Development Administration, 12(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.2345/jda.2023.12.001

This research investigated the multi-sectoral readiness of Barcelona, Sorsogon, to implement the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) Smart and Sustainable Communities Program (SSCP). Utilizing a qualitative descriptive research design through the lens of the Quadruple Helix model, the study evaluated the insights and perceptions of twentyfive purposively sampled key informants from the Government, Academe, Industry (farmers and fisherfolks), and Civil Society Organization (CSO) sectors to transition into a "Smart Community". Findings revealed an "aspirational but fragmented" readiness; while the LGU sector perceived the program as operationally ready and politically wellsupported, its implementation is constrained by multi-sectoral silos, a fragmented data management system, and severe infrastructure limitations across the academe, industry, and CSO sectors. Identified opportunities for community empowerment and socio-economic growth are currently offset by barriers such as an unstable internet and signal connectivity gap, physical infrastructure limitations, climate vulnerability, and grassroots technology anxiety. Other existing infrastructures and governance policies provide a strong baseline of active transactional modules, physical facilities, and supportive state directives, but their actual deployment is heavily constrained by localized system fragmentation, data silos, and severe educational resource deficits. Key challenges include a perception of total technological dependency and high maintenance risks, with sustainable adoption heavily constrained by an operational fear of mechanical downtime, generational software resistance, and institutional personnel burnout. To address these structural gaps, the study proposed a strategic implementation plan designed to improve execution by shifting from simple hardware distribution to establishing a human-centric support ecosystem. Core strategies focus on multi-sectoral governance synchronization, inclusive digital literacy interventions, centralized data integration, and permanent financial sustainability mechanisms. Ultimately, this research provides a localized, evidence-based roadmap for fourth-class municipalities to achieve smart advancement while balancing technological progress with institutional and human readiness to prevent social exclusion in rural innovation.

Keywords : Smart and Sustainable Communities Program, Community Readiness, Quadruple Helix, Digital Divide, Barcelona Sorsogon.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe