Institutional Support Towards Career Achievement: Lived Experiences of Key Stage 1 Teachers


Authors : Jesielyn P. Mancia; Remigilda Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrjh5mfe

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun793

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study explored the lived experiences of key stage 1 teachers regarding the institutional support they receive. Recognizing that key stage 1 teachers play a critical role in foundational education, the study aimed to uncover the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they employ, and the insights they can offer to improve support systems. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion using an interview guide. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to generate key themes across participants' narratives. Findings revealed five primary challenges: inadequate access to professional development opportunities, lack of instructional resources, limited administrative and peer support, unclear career progression pathways, and high workload with minimal institutional recognition. To cope, teachers engaged in attending external training independently, creating and recycling low-cost materials, seeking peer support, self-initiating career planning, and practicing time management with personal boundaries. Insights emphasized the need for responsive institutional support, the role of collaboration, the possibility of growth despite limitations, the importance of clear career direction, and recognition to sustain morale. The study implies a need for more targeted, responsive, and structured institutional support for key stage 1 teachers. Policies and practices at the school and national levels must address gaps in resources, professional development, recognition, and career advancement to promote teacher effectiveness and well-being.

Keywords : Key Stage 1 Teachers, Institutional Support, Career Development, Qualitative Research, Phenomenology, Coping Mechanisms.

References :

  1. Alvarado, T., & Skibbe, L. (2021). Institutional support and teacher burnout: Strategies for improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 897-912. Retrieved from https://www.journalofeducationalpsychology.com/articles/897-912
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from https://www.prenticehall.com/sociallearningtheory
  3. Borman, G. D., & Kimball, S. (2019). Resource Allocation and Teacher Effectiveness: A Review of Evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 430-448. Retrieved from https://www.eepa.com/articles/41-3/430-448
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://www.sagepub.com/books/qualitativeinquiry3rd
  6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.learningpolicyinstitute.org/reports/effective-teacher-pd
  7. DeAngelis, C. A., White, D., & Kieffer, S. (2020). Teacher Autonomy and Job Satisfaction: Exploring the Links. Educational Policy, 54(2), 231-249. Retrieved from https://www.educationalpolicy.com/articles/54-2/231-249
  8. Desimone, L. M. (2016). Improving Impact through Professional Development. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 825-853. Retrieved from https://www.reviewofeducationalresearch.com/articles/86-4/825-853
  9. Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Product of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545.
  10. Gonzales, M. (2021). Professional Development Needs of Early Childhood Educators in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(2), 112-125. Retrieved from https://www.philjofeducation.com/articles/95-2/112-125
  11. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 29(2), 75-91.
  12. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). SAGE Publications.
  13. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2015). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. Teachers College Press.
  14. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2015). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://www.teacherscollegepress.com/books/professionalcapital
  15. Hough, H. J., & Eom, S. B. (2020). Resource Allocation and Its Impact on Teaching and Learning. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 28(12), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.epaa.com/articles/28-12/1-20
  16. Hughes, D., & Hughes, P. (2021). Global Perspectives on Early Childhood Educators' Professional Development. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 29(3), 45-59.
  17. Hughes, D., & Hughes, P. (2021). Global Perspectives on Early Childhood Educators' Professional Development. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 29(3), 45-59. Retrieved from https://www.ijearlychildhoodedu.com/articles/29-3/45-59
  18. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2018). The Role of Institutional Support in Reducing Teacher Stress and Burnout. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 289-315. Retrieved from https://www.aerj.com/articles/55-2/289-315
  19. Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2019). How School Leaders Influence Teaching and Learning: The Importance of the School Principal. Educational Policy, 37(2), 299-319. Retrieved from https://www.educationalpolicy.com/articles/37-2/299-319
  20. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  21. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Inter Views: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  23. Lopez, A., & Garcia, R. (2023). Institutional Support for Early Childhood Educators in Davao City. Davao City Educational Review, 8(1), 78-89. Retrieved from https://www.davaocityeducreview.com/articles/8-1/78-89
  24. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-260. URL
  25. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
  26. Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2020). Mentoring New Teachers: Impacts on Classroom Practice and Teacher Retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 66-79. Retrieved from https://www.journalofteachereducation.com/articles/71-1/66-79
  27. Oberhuemer, P. (2020). Early Childhood Education in Global Perspective. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/books/earlychildhoodeducation/globalperspective
  28. OECD. (2022). Early Childhood Education and Care Policy Review. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/earlychildhoodpolicyreview
  29. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. URL
  30. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
  31. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
  32. Super, D. E. (1990). A Theory of Vocational Development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career Choice and Development (pp. 66-100). Jossey-Bass.
  33. Reyes, J., & Santos, L. (2020). Challenges in Early Childhood Education in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Education, 12(4), 301-315. Retrieved from https://www.asianjournalofeducation.com/articles/12-4/301-315
  34. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2018). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: Making Sense of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 1-30. Retrieved from https://www.reviewofeducationalresearch.com/articles/88-1/1-30
  35. Rodd, J. (2019). Leadership in Early Childhood Education: Values and Practices. Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://www.sagepub.com/books/leadershipearlychildhoodeducation
  36. Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. URL
  37. Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 118-137). SAGE Publications.
  38. Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2015). What Are the Effects of Induction and Mentoring on Beginning Teacher Attrition? American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 19-52. Retrieved from https://www.aerj.com/articles/52-1/19-52
  39. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2017). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration.
  40. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2017). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Retrieved from https://www.bestevidencesynthesis.com/reports/tpld
  41. Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  42. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2018). A Review of Research on Professional Learning Communities: What Do We Know? Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 212-226. Retrieved from https://www.teachingandteachereducation.com/articles/75/212-226
  43. Wang, M. T., Hall, N. C., & Rahm, J. (2021). Career Advancement and Teacher Retention: The Influence of Professional Development Opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 394-420.
  44. Wang, M. T., Hall, N. C., & Rahm, J. (2021). Career Advancement and Teacher Retention: The Influence of Professional Development Opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 394-420. Retrieved from https://www.eaq.com/articles/57-3/394-420
  45. Whitebread, D., Basilio, M., Kuusisto, E., & Pasternak, D. (2021). Early Childhood Education and Care: A Comparative Study. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/books/earlychildhoodeducation
  46. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2018). Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Report by Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.ies.ed.gov/reports/teacherpd

This study explored the lived experiences of key stage 1 teachers regarding the institutional support they receive. Recognizing that key stage 1 teachers play a critical role in foundational education, the study aimed to uncover the challenges they face, the coping mechanisms they employ, and the insights they can offer to improve support systems. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion using an interview guide. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to generate key themes across participants' narratives. Findings revealed five primary challenges: inadequate access to professional development opportunities, lack of instructional resources, limited administrative and peer support, unclear career progression pathways, and high workload with minimal institutional recognition. To cope, teachers engaged in attending external training independently, creating and recycling low-cost materials, seeking peer support, self-initiating career planning, and practicing time management with personal boundaries. Insights emphasized the need for responsive institutional support, the role of collaboration, the possibility of growth despite limitations, the importance of clear career direction, and recognition to sustain morale. The study implies a need for more targeted, responsive, and structured institutional support for key stage 1 teachers. Policies and practices at the school and national levels must address gaps in resources, professional development, recognition, and career advancement to promote teacher effectiveness and well-being.

Keywords : Key Stage 1 Teachers, Institutional Support, Career Development, Qualitative Research, Phenomenology, Coping Mechanisms.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2025

Paper Review Notification
In 2-3 Days

Paper Publishing
In 2-3 Days

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe