⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Integrated Financial Management Information Systems (IFMIS) and Public Sector Financial Performance in Sierra Leone: An Assessment of Successes and Persistent Challenges


Authors : Musa Abdullah Kargbo; Joseph Momoh. Conteh

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mnuswcrp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ms44a2na

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1739

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Sierra Leone adopted an Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) in the mid-2000s as the digital centrepiece of its post-conflict public financial management (PFM) reform programme. Two decades on, the system processes the bulk of central government expenditure, yet audit reports, Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments and International Monetary Fund (IMF) surveillance continue to record weaknesses in budget credibility, expenditure control and fiscal transparency. This article critically evaluates how IFMIS has influenced public sector financial performance in Sierra Leone, focusing on budget execution, digital government accounting and financial reporting efficiency. The study addresses a gap in the literature, which has documented IFMIS adoption across Sub-Saharan Africa but has paid limited analytical attention to small, aid-dependent, post-conflict states. Using a qualitative singlecountry case study design grounded in documentary analysis, the article triangulates evidence from PEFA assessments (2007 to 2021), Audit Service Sierra Leone annual reports, Ministry of Finance and Accountant General’s Department publications, IMF Article IV consultations, World Bank project documentation and peer-reviewed scholarship, interpreted through an integrated framework drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Institutional Theory, Agency Theory and Public Value Theory. The findings show genuine gains: automated commitment control, a functioning Treasury Single Account, faster production of annual financial statements, stronger audit trails and improved payroll integrity. Yet these gains are bounded by persistent constraints, including unreliable power and connectivity, high staff turnover, weak system integration, extra-budgetary practices that bypass controls, underfunded maintenance and fragile cybersecurity and business continuity arrangements. The article concludes that technology has outpaced the institutions meant to govern it, and that the next reform phase must privilege enforcement, integration and human capacity over new software. Twenty-five policy recommendations are advanced for government, development partners and oversight institutions.

Keywords : IFMIS; Public Financial Management; Sierra Leone; Budget Execution; Government Accounting; Financial Reporting; Digital Governance; Fiscal Transparency.

References :

  1. Accountant General’s Department. (2022). Annual public accounts of the Government of Sierra Leone for the financial year ended 31 December 2021. Government of Sierra Leone.
  2. African Development Bank. (2020). Sierra Leone country strategy paper 2020 to 2025. African Development Bank Group.
  3. Allen, R., Hemming, R., & Potter, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook of public financial management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315304
  4. Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
  5. Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060974
  6. Andrews, M., Cangiano, M., Cole, N., de Renzio, P., Krause, P., & Seligmann, R. (2014). This is PFM (CID Working Paper No. 285). Center for International Development, Harvard University.
  7. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants [ACCA]. (2017). IPSAS implementation: Current status and challenges. ACCA.
  8. Audit Service Sierra Leone. (2022). Annual report of the Auditor-General on the accounts of Sierra Leone for the financial year 2021. ASSL.
  9. Audit Service Sierra Leone. (2023). Annual report of the Auditor-General on the accounts of Sierra Leone for the financial year 2022. ASSL.
  10. Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000136
  11. Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and development. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(3), 1–18.
  12. Bank of Sierra Leone. (2022). Annual report and statement of accounts 2021. Bank of Sierra Leone.
  13. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  14. Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of e-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23(5), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701572913
  15. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
  16. Betley, M., Bird, A., & Ghartey, A. (2012). Evaluation of public financial management reform in Ghana, 2001 to 2010: Final country case study report. Sida, Danida and African Development Bank.
  17. Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government: From vision to implementation. Sage.
  18. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  19. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press.
  20. Cangiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (Eds.). (2013). Public financial management and its emerging architecture. International Monetary Fund.
  21. Chêne, M. (2009). The implementation of integrated financial information management systems (IFMIS) (U4 Expert Answer). U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.
  22. Cheruiyot, P. K., & Rotich, G. (2018). Effect of integrated financial management information system on financial management in county governments in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(2), 21–43.
  23. Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314546580
  24. Ciborra, C. (2005). Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Information Technology and People, 18(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510615879
  25. Cordery, C. J., & Hay, D. (2019). Supreme audit institutions and public value: Demonstrating relevance. Financial Accountability and Management, 35(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12185
  26. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  27. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  28. de Renzio, P., Andrews, M., & Mills, Z. (2011). Does donor support to public financial management reforms in developing countries work? An analytical study of quantitative cross-country evidence (Working Paper No. 329). Overseas Development Institute.
  29. de Renzio, P., & Wehner, J. (2017). The impacts of fiscal openness. World Bank Research Observer, 32(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx004
  30. Dener, C., Nii-Aponsah, H., Ghunney, L. E., & Johns, K. D. (2021). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1765-6
  31. Dener, C., Watkins, J., & Dorotinsky, W. L. (2011). Financial management information systems: 25 years of World Bank experience on what works and what doesn’t. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8750-4
  32. Dener, C., & Young, S. (2013). Financial management information systems and open budget data: Do governments report on where the money goes? World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0083-2
  33. Diamond, J., & Khemani, P. (2006). Introducing financial management information systems in developing countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(3), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v5-art20-en
  34. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  35. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead: Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
  36. Eme, O. I., Chukwurah, D. C., & Iheanacho, E. N. (2015). An analysis of pros and cons of treasury single account policy in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(4), 20–39.
  37. Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies. The Computer Journal, 62(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082
  38. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
  39. FreeBalance. (2019). Government resource planning in post-conflict and fragile states. FreeBalance Inc.
  40. Fritz, V., Verhoeven, M., & Avenia, A. (2017). Political economy of public financial management reforms: Experiences and implications for dialogue and operational engagement. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/28887
  41. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
  42. Government of Sierra Leone. (2005). Government Budgeting and Accountability Act 2005. Government Printing Department.
  43. Government of Sierra Leone. (2016). Public Financial Management Act 2016. Government Printing Department.
  44. Government of Sierra Leone. (2018). Public Financial Management Regulations 2018. Government Printing Department.
  45. Government of Sierra Leone. (2019). Sierra Leone’s medium-term national development plan 2019 to 2023: Education for development. Government of Sierra Leone.
  46. Government of Sierra Leone. (2021). Cybersecurity and Crime Act 2021. Government Printing Department.
  47. Government of Sierra Leone. (2022). Local Government Act 2022. Government Printing Department.
  48. Government of Sierra Leone. (2024). Sierra Leone national development plan 2024 to 2030. Government of Sierra Leone.
  49. Gupta, S., Keen, M., Shah, A., & Verdier, G. (Eds.). (2017). Digital revolutions in public finance. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484315224.071
  50. Hashim, A., Farooq, K., & Piatti-Fünfkirchen, M. (2020). Ensuring better PFM outcomes with FMIS investments: An operational guidance note for FMIS project teams (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9153). World Bank.
  51. Hashim, A., & Piatti-Fünfkirchen, M. (2018). Lessons from reforming financial management information systems: A review of the evidence (Policy Research Working Paper No. 8312). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8312
  52. Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
  53. Hendriks, C. J. (2013). Integrated financial management information systems: Guidelines for effective implementation by the public sector of South Africa. SA Journal of Information Management, 15(1), Article 529. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v15i1.529
  54. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  55. Hove, M., & Wynne, A. (2010). The experience of medium term expenditure framework and integrated financial management information system reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa: What is the balance sheet? (Occasional Paper No. 9). African Capacity Building Foundation.
  56. International Budget Partnership. (2023). Open budget survey 2023: Sierra Leone. International Budget Partnership.
  57. International Federation of Accountants [IFAC]. (2021). International public sector financial accountability index: 2021 status report. IFAC.
  58. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2018). Fiscal transparency handbook. IMF. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484331859.069
  59. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2019). Fiscal monitor: Curbing corruption. IMF.
  60. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2021). Sierra Leone: Third and fourth reviews under the extended credit facility arrangement (IMF Country Report). IMF.
  61. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2022a). Sierra Leone: 2022 Article IV consultation and fifth review under the extended credit facility arrangement (IMF Country Report). IMF.
  62. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2022b). Uganda: 2022 Article IV consultation (IMF Country Report). IMF.
  63. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2023). Ghana: Request for an arrangement under the extended credit facility (IMF Country Report). IMF.
  64. International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2024). Sierra Leone: 2024 Article IV consultation (IMF Country Report). IMF.
  65. International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions [INTOSAI]. (2019). ISSAI 100: Fundamental principles of public-sector auditing. INTOSAI.
  66. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board [IPSASB]. (2022). Handbook of international public sector accounting pronouncements. IFAC.
  67. Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl. 1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
  68. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  69. Karangwa, J., Uwizeyimana, D. E., & Nzewi, O. (2020). Public financial management digitalisation and accountability in Rwanda. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 5(2), 32–49.
  70. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002
  71. Krishna, S., & Walsham, G. (2005). Implementing public information systems in developing countries: Learning from a success story. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20007
  72. Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00275.x
  73. Lawson, A. (2015). Public financial management (GSDRC Professional Development Reading Pack No. 6). University of Birmingham.
  74. Lio, M.-C., Liu, M.-C., & Ou, Y.-P. (2011). Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.005
  75. Madon, S. (2009). E-governance for development: A focus on rural India. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250499
  76. Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
  77. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
  78. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
  79. Ministry of Finance. (2018). Public financial management reform strategy 2018 to 2021. Government of Sierra Leone.
  80. Ministry of Finance. (2023). Public financial management reform strategy 2023 to 2027. Government of Sierra Leone.
  81. Mkasiwa, T. A. (2020). Budgetary practices in the Tanzanian parliament: A Bourdieusian perspective. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0170
  82. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
  83. Moretti, D., & Youngberry, T. (2018). Getting added value out of accruals reforms. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 18(1), 114–166. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-18-5j8l804hpvmt
  84. Mzenzi, S. I., & Gaspar, A. F. (2015). External auditing and accountability in the Tanzanian local government authorities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(6/7), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2014-1028
  85. National Revenue Authority. (2022). Annual report 2021. National Revenue Authority, Sierra Leone.
  86. Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
  87. Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine-Atherton.
  88. Njonde, J. N., & Kimanzi, K. (2014). Effect of integrated financial management information system on performance of public sector: A case of Nairobi City County government. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(12), 913–936.
  89. Odoyo, F. S., Adero, P., & Chumba, S. (2014). Integrated financial management information system and its effect on cash management in Eldoret West District Treasury, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(8), 31–37.
  90. O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x
  91. Ohemeng, F. L. K., & Ofosu-Adarkwa, K. (2018). The challenges of implementing integrated financial management information systems in Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 5(2), 1–15.
  92. Okerekeoti, C. U., & Okoye, E. I. (2021). Treasury single account (TSA) in Nigeria: A theoretical perspective. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 5(4), 558–563.
  93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 3). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en
  94. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2022). Harnessing digital technology and data in public financial management. OECD Publishing.
  95. Pattanayak, S., & Fainboim, I. (2011). Treasury single account: An essential tool for government cash management (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 11/04). International Monetary Fund.
  96. PEFA Secretariat. (2007). Sierra Leone: Public financial management performance assessment report. PEFA Secretariat.
  97. PEFA Secretariat. (2010). Sierra Leone: Public financial management performance assessment report. PEFA Secretariat.
  98. PEFA Secretariat. (2014). Sierra Leone: Public financial management performance assessment report. PEFA Secretariat.
  99. PEFA Secretariat. (2018). Sierra Leone: Public expenditure and financial accountability performance assessment report. PEFA Secretariat.
  100. PEFA Secretariat. (2020). 2020 global report on public financial management. PEFA Secretariat.
  101. Peterson, S. (2006). Automating public financial management in developing countries (Faculty Research Working Paper No. RWP06-043). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902386
  102. Pimenta, C., & Pessoa, M. (Eds.). (2015). Public financial management in Latin America: The key to efficiency and transparency. Inter-American Development Bank and International Monetary Fund.
  103. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  104. Polzer, T., Adhikari, P., Nguyen, C. P., & Gårseth-Nesbakk, L. (2023). Adoption of the international public sector accounting standards in emerging economies and low-income countries: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 35(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-01-2021-0016
  105. Premchand, A. (1993). Public expenditure management. International Monetary Fund.
  106. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  107. Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31(Suppl. 1), S63–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
  108. Schiavo-Campo, S. (2017). Government budgeting and expenditure management: Principles and international practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645872
  109. Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.123
  110. Semakula, L., & Muwanga, R. (2012). Uganda: Implementing an integrated financial management system and the automation of the budget process (Country Learning Notes). Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative.
  111. Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553
  112. Simson, R., & Welham, B. (2014). Incredible budgets: Budget credibility in theory and practice (Working Paper No. 400). Overseas Development Institute.
  113. Statistics Sierra Leone. (2023). Annual statistical digest 2022. Statistics Sierra Leone.
  114. Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00513
  115. Tavakoli, H., Simson, R., & Tilley, H. (2013). Unblocking results: Using aid to address governance constraints in public service delivery. Overseas Development Institute.
  116. Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. Transparency International.
  117. Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
  118. Uña, G., Allen, R., & Botton, N. (2019). How to design a financial management information system: A modular approach (How-To Note No. 19/03). International Monetary Fund.
  119. Uña, G., Verma, A., Bazarbash, M., & Griffin, N. (2023). Digital solutions guidelines for public financial management (Working Paper No. 2023/007). International Monetary Fund.
  120. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  121. Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
  122. Wang, V., & Rakner, L. (2005). The accountability function of supreme audit institutions in Malawi, Uganda and Tanzania (CMI Report No. R 2005:4). Chr. Michelsen Institute.
  123. World Bank. (2009). Sierra Leone: Integrated public financial management reform project (Project Appraisal Document). World Bank.
  124. World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1
  125. World Bank. (2017). Sierra Leone: Public financial management improvement and consolidation project (Implementation Status and Results Reports). World Bank.
  126. World Bank. (2020). Rwanda: Public expenditure review. World Bank.
  127. World Bank. (2021a). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0
  128. World Bank. (2021b). Sierra Leone: Public expenditure review. World Bank.
  129. Wynne, A. (2005). Public financial management reforms in developing countries: Lessons of experience from Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda (Working Paper No. 7). African Capacity Building Foundation.
  130. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Sierra Leone adopted an Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) in the mid-2000s as the digital centrepiece of its post-conflict public financial management (PFM) reform programme. Two decades on, the system processes the bulk of central government expenditure, yet audit reports, Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments and International Monetary Fund (IMF) surveillance continue to record weaknesses in budget credibility, expenditure control and fiscal transparency. This article critically evaluates how IFMIS has influenced public sector financial performance in Sierra Leone, focusing on budget execution, digital government accounting and financial reporting efficiency. The study addresses a gap in the literature, which has documented IFMIS adoption across Sub-Saharan Africa but has paid limited analytical attention to small, aid-dependent, post-conflict states. Using a qualitative singlecountry case study design grounded in documentary analysis, the article triangulates evidence from PEFA assessments (2007 to 2021), Audit Service Sierra Leone annual reports, Ministry of Finance and Accountant General’s Department publications, IMF Article IV consultations, World Bank project documentation and peer-reviewed scholarship, interpreted through an integrated framework drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Institutional Theory, Agency Theory and Public Value Theory. The findings show genuine gains: automated commitment control, a functioning Treasury Single Account, faster production of annual financial statements, stronger audit trails and improved payroll integrity. Yet these gains are bounded by persistent constraints, including unreliable power and connectivity, high staff turnover, weak system integration, extra-budgetary practices that bypass controls, underfunded maintenance and fragile cybersecurity and business continuity arrangements. The article concludes that technology has outpaced the institutions meant to govern it, and that the next reform phase must privilege enforcement, integration and human capacity over new software. Twenty-five policy recommendations are advanced for government, development partners and oversight institutions.

Keywords : IFMIS; Public Financial Management; Sierra Leone; Budget Execution; Government Accounting; Financial Reporting; Digital Governance; Fiscal Transparency.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe