Intrusion Mechanics in Orthodontics


Authors : Dr. Sharath Kumar Shetty; Dr. Revanth S Soonthodu; Dr. Gundappa Matur

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3dk94jfs

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/fzn75dmp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR1940

Abstract : Various methods for incisor intrusion and molar intrusion are discussed in detail in this review. These techniques involve applying different forces and mechanics to move teeth vertically into the jawbone.For incisor intrusion, methods such as utility arches, Connecticut intrusion arches, Burstone intrusion arches, K sir Arch, and tip back springs are utilized. Each of these methods employs unique mechanics to achieve the desired vertical movement of the incisors.On the other hand, molar intrusion techniques include the use of Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs), headgears, biteplanes, magnets, maxillary intrusion splints, Invisalign, and active vertical correctors. These methods provide various approaches to intrude molars by applying force in different ways.The choice of intrusion method depends on factors such as the specific orthodontic case, treatment goals, and patient anatomy. Each technique has its own advantages, limitations, and indications for use in clinical practice..The aim of this overview is to provide information for approaching the ways of intrusion.

Keywords : Intrusion, Utility Arches, TAD’s, K-SIR Arch.

References :

  1. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977; 72:1-22
  2. Nanda R S, Tosun Y S.Biomechanics in Orthodontics-Principles and Practice.
  3. Nikolai RJ. Response of dentition and periodontium to force. Bioengineering Analysis of Orthodontic Mechanics. Philadelphia: Lea and Febinger; 1985. p. 146-93.
  4. Ng J, Major PW, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:212-9.
  5. Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Force systems from an ideal arch. Am J Orthod 1974;65:270-89.
  6. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP, Droschl H. Evaluation of continuous arch and segmented arch leveling techniques in adult patients — A clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:647-52.
  7. Al-Zubair NM. Orthodontic intrusion: A contemporary review. Journal of Orthodontic Research. 2014 Sep 1;2(3):118.
  8. Burstone CJ. The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques. Angle Orthod 1966;36:99-120
  9. Davidovitch M, Rebellato J. Two-couple orthodontic appliance systems utility arches: A two-couple intrusion arch. Semin Orthod 1995;1:25-30
  10. McNamara JA Jr. Utility arches. J ClinOrthod 1986;20:452–456.
  11. Sahu S et al. Orthodontic intrusion:an insight. IJOHMR 2017;3(6):137-140.
  12. AlQabandi AK, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. A comparison of the effects of rectangular and round arch wires in leveling the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Nov;116(5):522-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70183-6. PMID: 10547511. - reverse curve spee.
  13. Nanda R, Marzban R, Kuhlberg A. The Connecticut intrusion arch. JCO 1998;12:1-24
  14. Burstone CJ. Rationale of the segmented arch. Am J Orthod 1962;48:805-22.
  15. Atram H,Chaudhari K, Atram D, Kalokhe S, Jaisawal N,Dharmadhikari M. Intrusion Mechanics in Orthodontics: A Review. EJMCM. 2021; 8(3): 624-632.
  16. Journal of Orthodontics. 2021 Oct 25;26. Shroff B, Lindauer SJ, Burstone CJ,Leiss JB. Segmented approach to simultaneous intrusion and space closure: Biomechanics of the three-piece base arch appliance. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop1995;107:136-43.
  17. Anjali N, Sarojini J, KA Mohan. Three piece intrusion arch – Simplified –A clinical time and motion study. JIOS 2009;43:38-49.
  18. Kalra V.Simultaneous intrusion and retraction of anterior teeth. J ClinOrthod1998;35:535-40.
  19. 11J hook - Orton HS, Slattery DA, Orton S. The treatment of severe ‘gummy’ Class II division 1 malocclusion using the maxillary intrusion splint. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:216-23.
  20. Polat-Ozsoy O, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Veziroglu F. Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):412-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn122. Epub 2009 Mar 16. PMID: 19289539.
  21. Apolinário ST, Meloti AF, Silva E, Cardoso MD, Consolaro A. Intrusion of posterior teeth using miniplates: intrusive mechanics is not the same as intrusion force. Dental Press 4
  22. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.
  23. Costopoulos G, Nanda R. An evaluation of root resorption incident to orthodontic intrusion. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop 1996;109:543-81315

Various methods for incisor intrusion and molar intrusion are discussed in detail in this review. These techniques involve applying different forces and mechanics to move teeth vertically into the jawbone.For incisor intrusion, methods such as utility arches, Connecticut intrusion arches, Burstone intrusion arches, K sir Arch, and tip back springs are utilized. Each of these methods employs unique mechanics to achieve the desired vertical movement of the incisors.On the other hand, molar intrusion techniques include the use of Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs), headgears, biteplanes, magnets, maxillary intrusion splints, Invisalign, and active vertical correctors. These methods provide various approaches to intrude molars by applying force in different ways.The choice of intrusion method depends on factors such as the specific orthodontic case, treatment goals, and patient anatomy. Each technique has its own advantages, limitations, and indications for use in clinical practice..The aim of this overview is to provide information for approaching the ways of intrusion.

Keywords : Intrusion, Utility Arches, TAD’s, K-SIR Arch.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe