Authors :
Mukwanya Nabusanga Hamayangwe; Dr. Nilanjana Kumari
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/56pcb5cw
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/bhc75dux
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14512926
Abstract :
Entrepreneurship is universally recognized as
a crucial catalyst for economic growth and development,
yet women and youth in Zambia, particularly in rural
areas, face significant barriers that hinder their
entrepreneurial potential. This study focused on
Chibombo District's Katuba and Keembe constituencies,
exploring the socio-economic factors affecting women's
and youth entrepreneurship's viability. Utilizing a mixed-
methods approach, the research collected data from 169
entrepreneurs aged 18-45, as well as 6-12 key informants,
through structured questionnaires, semi-structured
interviews, and four focus group discussions. Quantitative
data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while
qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The study
revealed that unemployment is the strongest motivator
for entrepreneurship, with high mean scores in Katuba
(3.98) and Keembe (3.89). Personal development and
wealth accumulation also emerged as key drivers,
particularly in Katuba, where personal wealth (mean =
3.61) and supportive government legislation (mean =
3.84) were emphasized. In contrast, social recognition
ranked lowest in importance, with scores of 2.34 in
Katuba and 2.48 in Keembe. Key obstacles included
capital constraints, lack of knowledge and skills, and
competition with larger enterprises, with mean scores in
Katuba for these factors being 3.64 (SD = 1.248), 3.55 (SD
= 1.396), and 3.44 (SD = 1.436) respectively. In Keembe,
technology adoption (mean = 3.82, SD = 1.258) and
business costs (mean = 3.51, SD = 1.250) were additional
critical barriers. Support systems and policy measures
varied across constituencies, including micro-.Loans,
government grants, vocational training, and market
access initiatives. However, socio-cultural factors like
traditional gender roles and community biases were
identified as significant barriers, limiting women’s
business opportunities, and discouraging youth from
entrepreneurship. Recommendations to address these
challenges include targeted financial support, skills
development, and socio-cultural interventions to enhance
inclusivity and stimulate rural economic growth.
Keywords :
Women, Entrepreneurship, Youth, Entrepreneurship, Rural Development, Zambia, and Chibombo District.
References :
- Abbott J., and Fuller-Love N. (2020). Networking for equine complementary therapists in the rural economy.
- Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 110-118. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.011
- Achtenhagen, L., Haag, K. and Welter, F. (2018). The role of gender in family-business research: A systematic literature review. In Ratten, V., Dana, L-P. and Ramadani, V. Women Entrepreneurship in Family Business (pp. 16-45). London: Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345550600.
- Anderson, A. R., and Gaddefors, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship as a community phenomenon; reconnecting meanings and place. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(4), 504-518. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.077576
- Astner, H. (2022). The marionette: embeddedness in a community of family-controlled firms. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(2), 260-277.
- https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2020-0011
- Baker, T., and Welter, F. (2020). Contextualizing entrepreneurship theory. Routledge.
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339261464_Contextualizing_Entrepreneurship_Theory/link/603db77f4585154e8c6e0dfe/download
- BEAM. (2019). “Yapasa: Youth in agribusiness.” Building Effective & Accessible Markets (BEAM) Exchange. https://beamexchange.org/practice/programme-index/224/.
- Gashi Nulleshi, S. and Tillmar, M. (2022). Rural proofing entrepreneurship in two fields of research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2021-0323
- Kania, I., Anggadwita, G. and Alamanda, D.T. (2021), "A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia", Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 432-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0137
- Knoben, J., and Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71-89.
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227657443
- Lubinda M, Musawa N, and Mataka. B, (2018) Investigating the Challenges Facing Women Entrepreneurs in Kabwe. The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research ISSN: 3471-7102, ISBN: 978-9982-70-318-5
- McElwee, G., Smith, R., and Somerville, P. (2018). Conceptualizing animation in rural communities: The Village SOS Case. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 173–198.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321318217.
- Ministry of Agriculture (2023). Zambia – Comprehensive Agriculture Transformation Support Programme. Lusaka: Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), Republic of Zambia.
- https://www.agriculture.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/DRAFT-CATSP-Version-02-April-2023-1.pdf.
- Population Council and UNFPA. (2019). State of the Youth in Zambia: Education, Unemployment, and Poverty Reduction. Policy Brief, Lusaka: Population Council and UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). https://zambia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Brief-Policy-Youth-Zambia.
- Rahman, M.M., Dana, L.-P., Moral, I.H., Anjum, N. and Rahaman, M.S. (2023), "Challenges of rural women entrepreneurs in Bangladesh to survive their family entrepreneurship: a narrative inquiry through storytelling", Journal of Family Business Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2022-0054
- Sahoo, Pravat Kumar, and G. P. Mishra. "Sustainability of Women Rural Entrepreneurship in India: A Study on SHGs in Odisha." Journal of Rural Studies 74 (2020): 254-263.
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339984957.
- Sofer, M., and Saada, M. A. T. (2017). Entrepreneurship of Women in the Rural Space in Israel: Catalysts and Obstacles to Enterprise Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12125
- Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K. and Páger, B., (2019). The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies, 53(9), pp.1308-1320. [Online] Available at:
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481
- Torre, A., and Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
- Yusuf, A.D., (2017). Youth business empowerment and entrepreneurship skills in Doguwa Local Government, Kano State, Nigeria. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), pp.163-168. [Online] Available at: https://www.ijhumas.com/ojs/index.php/kiujoss/article/view/54/52
- ZamStats. (2022). 2022 Census of Population and Housing. Preliminary report, Lusaka: Zambia Statistics Agency (ZamStats). https://www.zamstats.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2022.
- Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Yang, S., Wu, Y. and Du, J., (2020). Simulation and Analysis of the Complex Dynamic Behavior of Supply Chain Inventory System from Different Decision Perspectives. Complexity, 2020. [Online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7393848.
- Banda, T. (2020). Rural Entrepreneurship in Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Development in Practice, 30(1), 87-99.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Central Statistical Office of Zambia. (2020). Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report 2015. Government of Zambia.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Chisanga, B., & Ngulube, P. (2019). Barriers to Accessing Finance for SMEs in Zambia. Zambia Economic Journal, 10(3), 101-115.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
- CIOMS. (2016). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans.
- Kalaba, G. (2020). The Role of Women and Youth in Rural Economic Development. Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 123-135.
- Mumba, M., & Chanda, P. (2021). Economic Development in Rural Zambia: Opportunities and Challenges. Lusaka: Zambian Economic Research Institute.
- Mwape, A. (2018). Challenges Facing Rural Entrepreneurs in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 12(4), 345-357.
- Nkombo, J. (2017). The Effect of Infrastructure on Rural Business Performance in Zambia. Journal of Development Studies, 29(2), 45-60.
- World Bank. (2019). Supporting Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: Policy Recommendations. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human Participants.
- World Bank. (2020). Women and Youth in Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications.
- Zambia Statistics Agency. (2021). Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2020. Zambia Statistics Agency
- Zulu, L., & Tembo, R. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Entrepreneurship Programs in Zambia. Journal of African Economic Policy, 18(2), 210-225.
Entrepreneurship is universally recognized as
a crucial catalyst for economic growth and development,
yet women and youth in Zambia, particularly in rural
areas, face significant barriers that hinder their
entrepreneurial potential. This study focused on
Chibombo District's Katuba and Keembe constituencies,
exploring the socio-economic factors affecting women's
and youth entrepreneurship's viability. Utilizing a mixed-
methods approach, the research collected data from 169
entrepreneurs aged 18-45, as well as 6-12 key informants,
through structured questionnaires, semi-structured
interviews, and four focus group discussions. Quantitative
data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while
qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The study
revealed that unemployment is the strongest motivator
for entrepreneurship, with high mean scores in Katuba
(3.98) and Keembe (3.89). Personal development and
wealth accumulation also emerged as key drivers,
particularly in Katuba, where personal wealth (mean =
3.61) and supportive government legislation (mean =
3.84) were emphasized. In contrast, social recognition
ranked lowest in importance, with scores of 2.34 in
Katuba and 2.48 in Keembe. Key obstacles included
capital constraints, lack of knowledge and skills, and
competition with larger enterprises, with mean scores in
Katuba for these factors being 3.64 (SD = 1.248), 3.55 (SD
= 1.396), and 3.44 (SD = 1.436) respectively. In Keembe,
technology adoption (mean = 3.82, SD = 1.258) and
business costs (mean = 3.51, SD = 1.250) were additional
critical barriers. Support systems and policy measures
varied across constituencies, including micro-.Loans,
government grants, vocational training, and market
access initiatives. However, socio-cultural factors like
traditional gender roles and community biases were
identified as significant barriers, limiting women’s
business opportunities, and discouraging youth from
entrepreneurship. Recommendations to address these
challenges include targeted financial support, skills
development, and socio-cultural interventions to enhance
inclusivity and stimulate rural economic growth.
Keywords :
Women, Entrepreneurship, Youth, Entrepreneurship, Rural Development, Zambia, and Chibombo District.