Investigating Challenges Affecting the Viability of Women and Youths’ Entrepreneurship in Rural Constituencies in Zambia: A Case Study of Chibombo District in Central Province of Zambia


Authors : Mukwanya Nabusanga Hamayangwe; Dr. Nilanjana Kumari

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/56pcb5cw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bhc75dux

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14512926


Abstract : Entrepreneurship is universally recognized as a crucial catalyst for economic growth and development, yet women and youth in Zambia, particularly in rural areas, face significant barriers that hinder their entrepreneurial potential. This study focused on Chibombo District's Katuba and Keembe constituencies, exploring the socio-economic factors affecting women's and youth entrepreneurship's viability. Utilizing a mixed- methods approach, the research collected data from 169 entrepreneurs aged 18-45, as well as 6-12 key informants, through structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and four focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The study revealed that unemployment is the strongest motivator for entrepreneurship, with high mean scores in Katuba (3.98) and Keembe (3.89). Personal development and wealth accumulation also emerged as key drivers, particularly in Katuba, where personal wealth (mean = 3.61) and supportive government legislation (mean = 3.84) were emphasized. In contrast, social recognition ranked lowest in importance, with scores of 2.34 in Katuba and 2.48 in Keembe. Key obstacles included capital constraints, lack of knowledge and skills, and competition with larger enterprises, with mean scores in Katuba for these factors being 3.64 (SD = 1.248), 3.55 (SD = 1.396), and 3.44 (SD = 1.436) respectively. In Keembe, technology adoption (mean = 3.82, SD = 1.258) and business costs (mean = 3.51, SD = 1.250) were additional critical barriers. Support systems and policy measures varied across constituencies, including micro-.Loans, government grants, vocational training, and market access initiatives. However, socio-cultural factors like traditional gender roles and community biases were identified as significant barriers, limiting women’s business opportunities, and discouraging youth from entrepreneurship. Recommendations to address these challenges include targeted financial support, skills development, and socio-cultural interventions to enhance inclusivity and stimulate rural economic growth.

Keywords : Women, Entrepreneurship, Youth, Entrepreneurship, Rural Development, Zambia, and Chibombo District.

References :

  1. Abbott J., and Fuller-Love N. (2020). Networking for equine complementary therapists in the rural economy.
  2. Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 110-118.  DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.011
  3. Achtenhagen, L., Haag, K. and Welter, F. (2018). The role of gender in family-business research: A systematic literature review. In Ratten, V., Dana, L-P. and Ramadani, V. Women Entrepreneurship in Family Business (pp. 16-45). London: Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345550600.
  4. Anderson, A. R., and Gaddefors, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship as a community phenomenon; reconnecting meanings and place. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(4), 504-518. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.077576
  5. Astner, H. (2022). The marionette: embeddedness in a community of family-controlled firms. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(2), 260-277.
  6.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2020-0011
  7. Baker, T., and Welter, F. (2020). Contextualizing entrepreneurship theory. Routledge.
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339261464_Contextualizing_Entrepreneurship_Theory/link/603db77f4585154e8c6e0dfe/download
  9. BEAM. (2019). “Yapasa: Youth in agribusiness.” Building Effective & Accessible Markets (BEAM) Exchange.  https://beamexchange.org/practice/programme-index/224/.
  10. Gashi Nulleshi, S. and Tillmar, M. (2022). Rural proofing entrepreneurship in two fields of research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2021-0323
  11. Kania, I.Anggadwita, G. and Alamanda, D.T. (2021), "A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia", Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 432-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0137
  12. Knoben, J., and Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71-89.
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227657443
  14. Lubinda M, Musawa N, and Mataka. B, (2018) Investigating the Challenges Facing Women Entrepreneurs in Kabwe. The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research ISSN: 3471-7102, ISBN: 978-9982-70-318-5
  15. McElwee, G., Smith, R., and Somerville, P. (2018). Conceptualizing animation in rural communities: The Village SOS Case.  Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 173–198.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321318217.
  16. Ministry of Agriculture (2023). Zambia – Comprehensive Agriculture Transformation Support Programme. Lusaka: Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), Republic of Zambia.
  17. https://www.agriculture.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/DRAFT-CATSP-Version-02-April-2023-1.pdf.
  18. Population Council and UNFPA. (2019). State of the Youth in Zambia: Education, Unemployment, and Poverty Reduction. Policy Brief, Lusaka: Population Council and UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). https://zambia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Brief-Policy-Youth-Zambia.
  19. Rahman, M.M.Dana, L.-P.Moral, I.H.Anjum, N. and Rahaman, M.S. (2023), "Challenges of rural women entrepreneurs in Bangladesh to survive their family entrepreneurship: a narrative inquiry through storytelling", Journal of Family Business Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2022-0054
  20. Sahoo, Pravat Kumar, and G. P. Mishra. "Sustainability of Women Rural Entrepreneurship in India: A Study on SHGs in Odisha." Journal of Rural Studies 74 (2020): 254-263.
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339984957.
  22. Sofer, M., and Saada, M. A. T. (2017). Entrepreneurship of Women in the Rural Space in Israel: Catalysts and Obstacles to Enterprise Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12125
  23. Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K. and Páger, B., (2019). The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies, 53(9), pp.1308-1320. [Online] Available at:
  24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481
  25. Torre, A., and Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
  26. Yusuf, A.D., (2017). Youth business empowerment and entrepreneurship skills in Doguwa Local Government, Kano State, Nigeria. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), pp.163-168. [Online] Available at: https://www.ijhumas.com/ojs/index.php/kiujoss/article/view/54/52
  27. ZamStats. (2022). 2022 Census of Population and Housing. Preliminary report, Lusaka: Zambia Statistics Agency (ZamStats). https://www.zamstats.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2022.
  28. Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Yang, S., Wu, Y. and Du, J., (2020). Simulation and Analysis of the Complex Dynamic Behavior of Supply Chain Inventory System from Different Decision Perspectives. Complexity, 2020. [Online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7393848.
  29. Banda, T. (2020). Rural Entrepreneurship in Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Development in Practice, 30(1), 87-99.
  30. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  31. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  32. Central Statistical Office of Zambia. (2020). Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report 2015. Government of Zambia.
  33. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.
  34. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications.
  35. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  36. Chisanga, B., & Ngulube, P. (2019). Barriers to Accessing Finance for SMEs in Zambia. Zambia Economic Journal, 10(3), 101-115.
  37. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
  38. CIOMS. (2016). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans.
  39. Kalaba, G. (2020). The Role of Women and Youth in Rural Economic Development. Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 123-135.
  40. Mumba, M., & Chanda, P. (2021). Economic Development in Rural Zambia: Opportunities and Challenges. Lusaka: Zambian Economic Research Institute.
  41. Mwape, A. (2018). Challenges Facing Rural Entrepreneurs in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 12(4), 345-357.
  42. Nkombo, J. (2017). The Effect of Infrastructure on Rural Business Performance in Zambia. Journal of Development Studies, 29(2), 45-60.
  43. World Bank. (2019). Supporting Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: Policy Recommendations. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  44. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human Participants.
  45. World Bank. (2020). Women and Youth in Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications.
  46. Zambia Statistics Agency. (2021). Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2020. Zambia Statistics Agency
  47. Zulu, L., & Tembo, R. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Entrepreneurship Programs in Zambia. Journal of African Economic Policy, 18(2), 210-225.

Entrepreneurship is universally recognized as a crucial catalyst for economic growth and development, yet women and youth in Zambia, particularly in rural areas, face significant barriers that hinder their entrepreneurial potential. This study focused on Chibombo District's Katuba and Keembe constituencies, exploring the socio-economic factors affecting women's and youth entrepreneurship's viability. Utilizing a mixed- methods approach, the research collected data from 169 entrepreneurs aged 18-45, as well as 6-12 key informants, through structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and four focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The study revealed that unemployment is the strongest motivator for entrepreneurship, with high mean scores in Katuba (3.98) and Keembe (3.89). Personal development and wealth accumulation also emerged as key drivers, particularly in Katuba, where personal wealth (mean = 3.61) and supportive government legislation (mean = 3.84) were emphasized. In contrast, social recognition ranked lowest in importance, with scores of 2.34 in Katuba and 2.48 in Keembe. Key obstacles included capital constraints, lack of knowledge and skills, and competition with larger enterprises, with mean scores in Katuba for these factors being 3.64 (SD = 1.248), 3.55 (SD = 1.396), and 3.44 (SD = 1.436) respectively. In Keembe, technology adoption (mean = 3.82, SD = 1.258) and business costs (mean = 3.51, SD = 1.250) were additional critical barriers. Support systems and policy measures varied across constituencies, including micro-.Loans, government grants, vocational training, and market access initiatives. However, socio-cultural factors like traditional gender roles and community biases were identified as significant barriers, limiting women’s business opportunities, and discouraging youth from entrepreneurship. Recommendations to address these challenges include targeted financial support, skills development, and socio-cultural interventions to enhance inclusivity and stimulate rural economic growth.

Keywords : Women, Entrepreneurship, Youth, Entrepreneurship, Rural Development, Zambia, and Chibombo District.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe