Investigating EFL English-Majored Students’ Perceptions towards the Use of Technology in Language Teaching


Authors : Lam Ky Nhan

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2nxhjcjb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2hysmdd5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT842

Abstract : This study investigates EFL English-majored students’ opinions of technology use in language learning at Nam Can Tho University, with an emphasis on both benefits and problems. The study uses a questionnaire survey with 85 participants to evaluate how technology affects students’ engagement, motivation, and overall learning experience. The findings show that students see major benefits from technology, such as increased engagement through multimedia materials, tailored learning experiences via applications, and access to real language input through online tools. Furthermore, students love the opportunity to communicate in real time with native speakers, which improves their language abilities and confidence. In contrast, the research cites a number of hurdles, including difficulty in integrating technology with the curriculum, technical concerns, possible diversions, and the need for more training and support. These findings emphasize the necessity of resolving these issues in order to maximize the usefulness of technology in language instruction, and they offer practical recommendations for educators and legislators.

Keywords : EFL Students, Technology Use, Perceptions, Benefits, Challenges.

References :

  1. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One-to-one computing: A summary of the empirical literature. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1671803
  2. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology taken off more in language learning?. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(2), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.2.377
  3. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  4. Chen, C. M., & Lee, T. H. (2017). Mobile learning and learning analytics: Adaptive learning in the mobile environment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6470-7
  5. Chun, D. M. (2016). The role of technology in SLA research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 98-104.
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  8. Davis, N. (2017). Challenges of digital transformation in education: Building the infrastructure for effective technology integration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0068-8
  9. Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D., & Hartman, J. L. (2004). Higher education, instructional technology, and the role of the faculty: Some insights from the front. Educause Review, 39(3), 52-62.
  10. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  12. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11. https://doi.org/10125/44207
  13. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  15. Hennessy, S., Harrison, C., & Wamakote, L. (2010). Teacher factors influencing classroom use of ICT in Sub-Saharan Africa. It & Development, 13(2), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.501099
  16. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  17. Hockly, N. (2018). Technology in the classroom. ELT Journal, 72(2), 143-150.
  18. Huang, R. H., & Lin, M. C. (2013). Exploring the impact of mobile learning on student engagement. In K. T. Chan & Y. K. Ko (Eds.), Mobile learning: Theory and practice (pp. 159-173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6140-3_12
  19. Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163-178.
  20. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Merrill.
  21. Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(3), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
  22. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264504
  23. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Language learning defined by time and place: A framework for evaluating mobile language learning. In S. T. C. Hsu & P. M. D. Lee (Eds.), Mobile learning: Piloting and evaluating new forms of teaching and learning (pp. 63-80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4633-5_4
  24. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile language learning: An overview of research and practice. In N. K. K. Hill (Ed.), Mobile learning: The next generation (pp. 1-14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203893286
  25. Liaw, M.-L. (2007). The influence of English proficiency and computer familiarity on EFL students’ perceptions of learning with the internet. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701489254
  26. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  27. Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: An exploration of the TPACK framework. In M. J. Hines & S. J. Avery (Eds.), Technology in teacher education: An exploration (pp. 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0692-2_1
  28. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Viking Press.
  29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  30. Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). The theory and practice of technology in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143-154.
  32. Rogers, E. M. (2016). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  33. Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 119-137). Bloomsbury Academic.
  35. Sweeney, S., & Inoue, N. (2017). Technology and language teaching: An overview. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  37. Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  39. Warschauer, M. (2010). The role of technology in language learning. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 13-25). Bloomsbury Academic.
  40. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
  41. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Educational Testing Service.

This study investigates EFL English-majored students’ opinions of technology use in language learning at Nam Can Tho University, with an emphasis on both benefits and problems. The study uses a questionnaire survey with 85 participants to evaluate how technology affects students’ engagement, motivation, and overall learning experience. The findings show that students see major benefits from technology, such as increased engagement through multimedia materials, tailored learning experiences via applications, and access to real language input through online tools. Furthermore, students love the opportunity to communicate in real time with native speakers, which improves their language abilities and confidence. In contrast, the research cites a number of hurdles, including difficulty in integrating technology with the curriculum, technical concerns, possible diversions, and the need for more training and support. These findings emphasize the necessity of resolving these issues in order to maximize the usefulness of technology in language instruction, and they offer practical recommendations for educators and legislators.

Keywords : EFL Students, Technology Use, Perceptions, Benefits, Challenges.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe