Authors :
Polycarp Ikechukwu Nwabuokei; Doris Onwenna Ngozi; Onyekachukwu Andrew Oginenwa
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5xdhjwyk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/yy62wf6n
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun982
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Process parameter optimization showed that
ethanol yield was favored at lower temperatures, while elevated temperature and alkaline pH conditions were inhibitory to
ethanol production. The optimal hydrolysis conditions were determined to be a temperature of 35 °C, a pH of 5.5, and a
hydrolysis period of 5.7 days. Kinetic analysis of the hydrolysis process demonstrated conformity with the Michaelis–Menten
model, yielding a maximum reaction rate (Vmax) of 23.81 g·dm⁻³·day⁻¹, a Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) of 20.56 g·dm⁻³,
and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.99, indicating an excellent fit of the model to the experimental data.
Keywords :
Michealis-Menten, Lignocellulosic, Enzymatic Hydrolysis.
References :
- Balat, M., & Balat, H. (2009). Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Applied Energy, 86(11), 2273–2282.
- Falade, K. O., & Okafor, C. A. (2015). Physical, functional and consumer preference properties of cocoyam products: A review. Food Science and Nutrition, 3(4), 277–289.
- Hamelinck, C. N., van Hooijdonk, G., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2005). Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Techno-economic performance in short-, middle-, and long-term. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(4), 384–410.
- Harinder Singh Oberoi, Simranjeet Kaur Sandhu, Praveen V. Vadlani, (2012).Statistical optimization of hydrolysis process for banana peels using cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes, Food and Bioproducts Processing 90, 257–265 Available at
- Hiren Patel, Anchit Patel, Tejash Surati and Gaurav Shah, (2012). Potential Use of Banana Peels for the Production of Fermented Products, IJED: Vol. 9, No. 1, January-June: 1-7.
- Igbokwe, P.K., Idogwu, C.N. and Nwabanne, J.T. (2016) Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Plantain Peels: Optimization and Kinetic Studies. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 6, 216-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aces.2016.62023
- Itelima, J., Onwuliri, F., Onwuliri, E., Onyimba, I. and Oforji, S. (2013) Bio-Ethanol Production from Banana, Plantain and Pineapple Peels by Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Process. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 4, 213-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.337
- Kongkiattikajorn, J., (2012). Ethanol Production from Dilute Acid Pretreated Cassava Peel by Fed-Batch SimultaneousbSaccharification and Fermentation. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 20, 22-27
- Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002). Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66(3), 506–577.
- Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y. Y., Holtzapple, M., & Ladisch, M. (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 96(6), 673–686.
- Ogbonna, J. C., Mashima, H., & Tanaka, H. (2001). Scale-up of fuel ethanol production from agricultural biomass. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 91(6), 557–563.
- Parveen Jamal, Olorunnisola K. Saheed and Zahangir Alam, (2012). Bio-Valorization Potential of Banana Peels (Musa sapientum): An Overview, Asian Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, DOI: 10.3923/ajbkr.2012
- Raikar , R. V. (2012). Enhanced production of Ethanol from grape waste. International Journal of Environmental Sciences Volume, 1-5.
- Sánchez, O. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008). Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5270–5295.
- Shrivastava, A., Sandagar, P., Baja, I. and Singhal, R. (2008). Media optimization for the production of U-linolenic acid by cunninghamella echinulata varielegans MTCC 522 using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Engineering, 4(2), 1-32
- Silverstein, R. M., Bassler, G. C., & Morrill, T. C. (1981). Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002). Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A review. Bioresource Technology, 83(1), 1–11.
- Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2007). Enzyme-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review. BioResources, 2(4), 707–738.
- Wrolstad, R. E. (2012). Food carbohydrate chemistry. John Wiley & Sons.
Process parameter optimization showed that
ethanol yield was favored at lower temperatures, while elevated temperature and alkaline pH conditions were inhibitory to
ethanol production. The optimal hydrolysis conditions were determined to be a temperature of 35 °C, a pH of 5.5, and a
hydrolysis period of 5.7 days. Kinetic analysis of the hydrolysis process demonstrated conformity with the Michaelis–Menten
model, yielding a maximum reaction rate (Vmax) of 23.81 g·dm⁻³·day⁻¹, a Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) of 20.56 g·dm⁻³,
and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.99, indicating an excellent fit of the model to the experimental data.
Keywords :
Michealis-Menten, Lignocellulosic, Enzymatic Hydrolysis.