Authors : Dr. Sharath Kumar Shetty; Dr. Revanth. S. Soonthodu; Dr. Aashiq Iqbal

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2r9bcfbh

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun742

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge and awareness of lingual orthodontics among dental students in Karnataka.  Methods: The participants included 100 BDS students. The knowledge of participants regarding lingual orthodontics were recorded using a specially designed questionnaire.  Results: The results were interprerted in pie chart. More than 36% students have not heard about lingual orthodontics. Many of the respondents felt clear aligners as more comfortable and practical option. Nevertheless manyopined that they would recommend lingual braces treatment and they feel it is effective  Conclusion: Knowledge of lingual orthodontics among BDS students is essential for broader patient awareness and alternative aesthetic treatment plans.

References :

1. Van der Veen MH, Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference? Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(3):298–303.
2. Fujita K. New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket (LB) technique. Am J Orthod. 1979;76 (6):657–675.
3. Kurz C. The lingual bracket technique. J Clin Orthod. 1982;16(10):670–681.
4. Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L. Customized lingual orthodontics: the future of invisible orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2011;17(4):302–311.
5. Echarri P. Lingual orthodontics: history, development, and innovations. J Orthod Sci. 2015;4 (3):63–67.
6. Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Orthodontic relapse, retention, and stability. Angle Orthod. 1994;64 (3):151–162.
7. Miyazawa K, Watanabe T, Koga Y, Sugawara Y. Use of a CAD/CAM system in lingual orthodontics: fabrication of customized brackets and setup models. Orthod Waves. 2011;70(4):139–146.
8. Wiechmann D. Lingual orthodontics (Part 1): laboratory procedure. J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60 (6):371–379.
9. Geron S, Romano R, Brosh T. Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors—a theoretical approach. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(2):195–201.
10. Choy K, Pae EK, Park Y-C, Kim K-H, Burstone CJ. Effect of tongue pressure on the position of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(6):419–424.
11. Lombardo L, Saba L, Scuzzo G, Takemoto K, Oteo L, Palma JC. The biomechanics of customized lingual appliances. Prog Orthod. 2017;18(1):38.
12. Albogha MH, Takahashi I. A systematic review of the effectiveness of lingual orthodontic treatment. J Orthod Sci. 2016;5(3):105–110.
13. Leal RC, de Paula DF, Mendes A, Normando D. Lingual versus labial fixed appliances: orthodontic treatment effects—a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(3):497–507.
14. Wu AKY, McGrath C, Wong RWK, Wiechmann D, Rabie ABM. A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(4):403–407.
15. Kiemle Trivedi B, Banh DS, Choy M, Raboud D, Flores-Mir C. Pain and discomfort associated with orthodontic treatments: a randomized controlled trial comparing labial and lingual appliances. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(6):1066–1071.
16. Fillion D. New lingual techniques: from segmented to full arch mechanics. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31(9):569–579.
17. Romano R. The art of invisible orthodontics. In: Romano R, editor. Lingual Orthodontics. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2011. p. 1–12.
18. Scuzzo G, Takemoto K. Invisible Orthodontics: Current Concepts and Solutions in Lingual Orthodontics. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing; 2010.
19. Huser MC, Baehni PC, Lang R. Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17(3):162–168.
20. Wiechmann D, Bannert A, Richter G. Bracket design in lingual orthodontics: A critical review. Int Orthod. 2007;5(3):267–282.
21. Fritz U, Diedrich P. Speech and swallowing with lingual appliances: a prospective evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(6):600–606.
22. Scuzzo G, Takemoto K. Lingual orthodontics: from aesthetics to function. Prog Orthod. 2001;2(1):6–23.
23. Schmid J, Engelhart R, Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schätzle M. Patient satisfaction and quality of life during fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment: a longitudinal prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(2):231–239.
24. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. Patients’ expectations and experiences of fixed orthodontic appliances: a longitudinal cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(3):369–375.
25. Wiechmann D, Hohoff A, Petersen N, Stamm T, Bach FW, Paulsen A. Longitudinal evaluation of pain frequency and intensity in patients treated with lingual appliances. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(2):292–298.
26. Grünheid T, Patel N, DeFelippe N. Accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility of indirect bonding: a comparison of two techniques. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(4):678–684.
27. Garino GB, Di Blasio A. The WIN appliance: a new generation of fully customized lingual orthodontic appliances. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48(5):277–285.