Authors :
Imane Ouchen; Ghizlane Chouay; Abderahmane El Arabi
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/y43jw6na
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mwrfntkx
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar272
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively becoming a fundamental part of organizational information systems, deeply
influencing decision-making processes, redistribution of authority, and socio-economic outcomes. Previous literature has mainly
focused on AI technology, digital transformation, and formal mechanisms of information systems governance. Yet, little
consideration has been given to leadership as a governance capability, particularly in AI-enabled socio-technical systems. The
issue here is that many AI-related governance failures are not primarily due to technical shortcomings but rather because of the
way algorithmic outputs are interpreted, enacted, and legitimized in organizational practice.
This article proposes a leadership-as-governance framework in the context of AI-enabled information systems. Based on a review
of information systems literature, leadership theories, and economic perspectives, the authors depict three leadership
configurations, discrete, transformational, and augmented leadership, that regulate ethical risk, innovation, and human, AI
complementarity, respectively. The paper further links leadership-based governance to the quality of AI system use, decision
quality, organizational innovation, and to broad socio-economic outcomes such as productivity dynamics, skill transformation,
and inequality by formulating a series of research propositions derived from the framework.
In this research leadership is analyzed as a multifaceted supervisory system rather than a managerial style only, therefore it
contributes to the extension of information systems governance theory and aligns with the debates on responsible AI, digital
transformation, and public policy. The proposed model is of great assistance to the organizations and policymakers who want
to manage AI-powered information systems at least in a way that differs from the compliance-centric approaches.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence; Information Systems Governance; Leadership; Human, AI Complementarity; Digital Transformation.
References :
- Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(4), 739–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa020
- Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business School Press.
- Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
- Badaracco, J. L. (2003). We don’t need another hero. Harvard Business School Press.
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general-purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180345
- Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12471
- Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
- De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2015). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. Springer.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
- Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
- Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
- Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
- Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
- Grandori, A. (2010). Asset coordination and the governance of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00895.x
- Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705061314
- Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Joti, Y. (2025). La gestion des projets open source : Les fondements d’une approche marketing axée sur la cocréation de la valeur (Doctoral dissertation). Université du Québec en Outaouais.
- Lollia, F. (2025). L’impact des nouvelles technologies sur le leadership. Actes de la 2ᵉ Rencontre des Dirigeants, Antananarivo, Madagascar. HAL Open Science. https://hal.science/hal-05063046
- March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
- OECD. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of work. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5467ee8e-en
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
- Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2016). Digital work. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 1–15.
- Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior. Journal of Management, 36(3), 609–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309358593
- Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., et al. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y
- Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13752
- Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
- Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). Free Press.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
- Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
- Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
- Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively becoming a fundamental part of organizational information systems, deeply
influencing decision-making processes, redistribution of authority, and socio-economic outcomes. Previous literature has mainly
focused on AI technology, digital transformation, and formal mechanisms of information systems governance. Yet, little
consideration has been given to leadership as a governance capability, particularly in AI-enabled socio-technical systems. The
issue here is that many AI-related governance failures are not primarily due to technical shortcomings but rather because of the
way algorithmic outputs are interpreted, enacted, and legitimized in organizational practice.
This article proposes a leadership-as-governance framework in the context of AI-enabled information systems. Based on a review
of information systems literature, leadership theories, and economic perspectives, the authors depict three leadership
configurations, discrete, transformational, and augmented leadership, that regulate ethical risk, innovation, and human, AI
complementarity, respectively. The paper further links leadership-based governance to the quality of AI system use, decision
quality, organizational innovation, and to broad socio-economic outcomes such as productivity dynamics, skill transformation,
and inequality by formulating a series of research propositions derived from the framework.
In this research leadership is analyzed as a multifaceted supervisory system rather than a managerial style only, therefore it
contributes to the extension of information systems governance theory and aligns with the debates on responsible AI, digital
transformation, and public policy. The proposed model is of great assistance to the organizations and policymakers who want
to manage AI-powered information systems at least in a way that differs from the compliance-centric approaches.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence; Information Systems Governance; Leadership; Human, AI Complementarity; Digital Transformation.