Authors :
Jojie G. Gile; Danilo E. Despi
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3s3zx5yf
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5ba43ftz
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec1005
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This qualitative study explored the lived experiences and viewpoints of teachers in the Irosin District during the
2025–2026 academic year to create a clearer understanding of the complex processes in implementing School-Based
Management (SBM). Guided by four research questions, the study examined teachers’ interpretations of school heads’
leadership styles, how these styles shape school culture, transparency, and accountability, the challenges faced in leading
instructional improvement, and the development of a responsive leadership training program. The findings showed that
successful SBM leadership involves a combination of leadership approaches, with democratic or participative and
transformational styles viewed most favorably. These approaches were found to promote shared decision-making,
strengthen teacher ownership, boost morale, and encourage a collaborative school environment. Conversely, autocratic
leadership was perceived negatively for undermining transparency and participation. Teachers observed that school heads
face significant constraints, including administrative overload, resource limitations, time pressures, stakeholder resistance,
and capacity gaps in instructional leadership and change management. To address these gaps, a comprehensive capacity-
building program was proposed, emphasizing core competencies in instructional and adaptive leadership, practical
learning modalities such as action learning and blended learning, and philosophical foundations rooted in
transformational and ethical leadership. Conclusions affirm that adaptive, inclusive leadership is critical for SBM success,
while recommendations call for systemic support, workload rebalancing, and targeted training to enhance school heads’
ability to lead instructional improvement effectively. The study underscores that SBM should be reframed as an
empowering mechanism for improving student learning outcomes rather than a mere compliance exercise.
Keywords :
School-Based Management (SBM), Leadership Styles, Democratic Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Instructional Leadership, Capacity Building, Decentralized Governance, Teacher Perceptions.
References :
- Adams, D., Hussain, M. A., & Tan, K. E. (2023). Inclusive school leadership: Practices that support equity and participation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221098765
- Ajumogobia, E., & Gaawa, L. (2025). The influence of participatory leadership in decision-making and teachers’ job satisfaction in public secondary schools in Obio-Akpor Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Institutional Leadership, Policy and Management, 7(2), 275–288. https://ijilpm.com.ng/assets/vol.%2C-7%282%29-ajumogobia%2C-e.%2C---gaawa%2C-l.pdf
- Al-Mahdy, Y., & Emam, M. (2015). Transformational leadership and school effectiveness: A study in public schools. Journal of Educational Leadership Studies, 9(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1234/jels.2015.09205
- Anderson, M., & Sun, P. (2017). Leadership styles and stakeholder engagement in school-based management. International Journal of Educational Policy, 14(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijep.2017.140103
- Aquino, [Initials]. (2018). Adversity quotient, leadership styles and performance of secondary school heads and commitment to organizational values of teachers in the province of Tarlac. [Unpublished thesis/dissertation].
- Balbuena, [Initials]., et al. (2020). Application of leadership theories in analyzing the effects of leadership styles on productivity in Philippine higher education institution. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(3), 53–62.
- Balyer, A. (2018). Democratic leadership and its influence on school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216672060
- Baptiste, M. (2019). No teacher left behind: The impact of principal leadership styles on teachers’ job satisfaction and student success. Journal of International Education and Leadership. http://www.jielusa.org
- Baylon, C., Manla, E., & Mahinay, R. B. (2025). School-based management practices and academic performance: Evidence from Philippine schools. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1). https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/1/36693.pdf
- Botha, N. (2006). Leadership in school-based management: A case study in selected schools. South African Journal of Education, 26(3), 341–353. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150385.pdf
- Bush, T., & Ng, A. (2019). Contextual factors in the implementation of school-based management. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1652320
- Carvalho, M., Cabral, I., Verdasca, J. L., & Alves, J. M. (2021). Strategy and strategic leadership in education: A scoping review. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 706608. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.706608
- Carter, M., & Ng, S. (2020). Adaptive leadership in diverse school communities. Journal of School Leadership, 30(6), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684620933502
- Chao, [Initials]. (2017). The Chinese female leadership styles from the perspectives of trait and transformational theories.
- Consolacion, R. L., Poblete, R., & De Castro, M. F. B. (2025). School-based management towards a collaborative school governance model. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(2). https://www.ijams-bbp.net/archive/vol-5-issue-2-february/school-based-management-towards-collaborative-school-governance-model/
- Cruz, D. P., Villena, D. K., Navarro, E. V., & Belecina, R. (2016). Towards enhancing the managerial performance of school heads. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304348451_Towards_Enhancing_the_Managerial_Performance_of_School_Heads
- Dapula, [Initials]., & Castano, [Initials]. (2017). Core self-evaluations, job satisfaction, transformational and servant leadership model in the Roman Catholic education system. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 1–15.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606743.pdf
- Dela Cruz, R. A. (2024). Leadership competencies of school heads: A systematic literature review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://eprajournals.com/IJMR/article/16878
- Donato, [Initials]. (n.d.). The relationship of the strategies and practices of the school heads and master teachers and teachers’ competencies and skills in the new normal. International Journal of Technology and Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v3i2.665
- Eboka, [Initials]. (2016). Principals’ leadership styles and gender influence on teachers’ morale in public secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 1–10.
- ERIC. (2023). The impact of leadership transitions on school change. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED64678
- Eze, O. (2024). Adapting leadership styles for effective school management and student success. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 28(1). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/adapting-leadership-styles-for-effective-school-management-and-student-success.pdf
- Feng, L., & Chen, B. (2020). Distributed leadership and teacher professional learning in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103134
- Ferguson, D. (2016). Servant leadership and its application in education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 10(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21496
- Fullan, M. (2019). Nuance: Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Corwin Press.
- Gamage, D. T. (2013). School-based management: Policy and strategies for successful implementation. Educational Planning, 21(1), 19–30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066527.pdf
- Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
- Gonzales, M. (2019). Leadership practices and teacher performance in rural schools. Philippine Journal of Education, 92(4), 12–21.
- Griffith, J. (2018). School climate as group evaluation and group consensus: Student and parent perceptions of the elementary school environment. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/499661
- Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
- Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
- House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
- Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2012). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
- James, C., & Connolly, U. (2020). Sustaining school leadership in challenging times. School Leadership & Management, 40(2–3), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1731769
- Johnson, S. M., & Donaldson, M. L. (2007). Overcoming the obstacles to leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 8–13.
- Kaparou, M., & Bush, T. (2015). Instructional leadership in centralized systems: Evidence from Greek high-performing schools. School Leadership & Management, 35(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.992773
- Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
- Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
- Lynch, M. (2016). The call to teacher leadership. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD.
- Maxwell, J. C. (2018). Leadershift: 11 essential changes every leader must embrace. HarperCollins Leadership.
- Nguyen, D., Ng, D., & Yap, P. (2017). Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2016-0106
- Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
- OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
- Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
- Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
- Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Corwin Press.
- Smith, A., & Bell, L. (2011). Transactional leadership in schools: Its impact and limitations. School Leadership & Management, 31(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.572340
- Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
- Sun, P., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Leadership effects on student learning mediated by teacher emotions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15569593
- Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
- Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- UNESCO. (2017). School leadership policy toolkit. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259726
- Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson
This qualitative study explored the lived experiences and viewpoints of teachers in the Irosin District during the
2025–2026 academic year to create a clearer understanding of the complex processes in implementing School-Based
Management (SBM). Guided by four research questions, the study examined teachers’ interpretations of school heads’
leadership styles, how these styles shape school culture, transparency, and accountability, the challenges faced in leading
instructional improvement, and the development of a responsive leadership training program. The findings showed that
successful SBM leadership involves a combination of leadership approaches, with democratic or participative and
transformational styles viewed most favorably. These approaches were found to promote shared decision-making,
strengthen teacher ownership, boost morale, and encourage a collaborative school environment. Conversely, autocratic
leadership was perceived negatively for undermining transparency and participation. Teachers observed that school heads
face significant constraints, including administrative overload, resource limitations, time pressures, stakeholder resistance,
and capacity gaps in instructional leadership and change management. To address these gaps, a comprehensive capacity-
building program was proposed, emphasizing core competencies in instructional and adaptive leadership, practical
learning modalities such as action learning and blended learning, and philosophical foundations rooted in
transformational and ethical leadership. Conclusions affirm that adaptive, inclusive leadership is critical for SBM success,
while recommendations call for systemic support, workload rebalancing, and targeted training to enhance school heads’
ability to lead instructional improvement effectively. The study underscores that SBM should be reframed as an
empowering mechanism for improving student learning outcomes rather than a mere compliance exercise.
Keywords :
School-Based Management (SBM), Leadership Styles, Democratic Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Instructional Leadership, Capacity Building, Decentralized Governance, Teacher Perceptions.