Levels of Hospital Hand Washing Compliances in Rwanda for Selected Healthcare Practioners in Nursing and Midwifry Professions


Authors : Mukasine Anne Marie; RN. Ingabire Clementine; Olive Mukanshimiyimana; John Peter Ndikubwimana; Jean Baptiste Ukwizabigira; Jane Iyakaremye; Eliab Mwiseneza; Murekatete Chanta; Dusabirema Immaculee

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4cxmd522

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2zhcz2aa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov577

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) significantly contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Proper hand hygiene is the most effective, simple, and cost-efficient measure for preventing HCAIs, yet compliance among healthcare workers remains suboptimal.  Objective: To assess handwashing knowledge, practices, and barriers among nurses and midwives for infection prevention in neonatology and maternity departments at Ruhengeri District Hospital, Rwanda.  Methods: A quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The study population included 56 nurses and midwives, with a convenience sample of 50 participants. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire divided into four sections: socio-demographics, knowledge, practices, and barriers. Knowledge items were adapted from WHO Hand Hygiene Guidelines, while practices and barriers were based on CDC and WHO recommendations. Validity was confirmed through expert review, and reliability via a pilot study (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to assess associations.  Results: The majority of participants (72%) demonstrated good knowledge of hand hygiene, while 28% had moderate knowledge. Regarding practices, 46% had good practice, 36% moderate, and 18% poor practice, with a mean practice score of 71.27%. Alcohol-based hand rub was routinely used by 62%, and only 28% had received formal hand hygiene training in the last three years. A significant association was found between department of work and handwashing practice (p = 0.012).  Conclusion: Nurses and midwives exhibit good knowledge but variable hand hygiene practices. Continuous training, policy reinforcement, and monitoring are essential to improve compliance and reduce HCAIs in neonatal care settings in Rwanda.

Keywords : Hand Hygiene, Infection Prevention, Nurses, Midwives, Neonatology, Rwanda, Healthcare-Associated Infections.

References :

  1. Alsofiani, A., Alomari, N., & Alqarny, B. (2016). Knowledge of healthcare-associated infections among nurses in Armed Forces Military Hospitals, Taif. Journal of Infection Prevention, 17(2), 78–84.
  2. Blencowe, H., Cousens, S., Oestergaard, M. Z., Chou, D., Moller, A. B., Narwal, R., … & Lawn, J. E. (2011). National, regional, and worldwide estimates of neonatal mortality and causes of death in 2008 with trends since 1990: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 375(9726), 1969–1987.
  3. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2011). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (5th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Darmstadt, G. L., Zaidi, A. K., & Stoll, B. J. (2011). Neonatal infections: Prevention and management. The Lancet, 377(9782), 1539–1550.
  6. Elizabeth, A. (2016). Incidence and burden of healthcare-associated infections in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 10(1), 1–10.
  7. Fashafsheh, I. (2015). Hand hygiene knowledge and practices among healthcare personnel in Palestine. International Journal of Infection Control, 11(3), 1–8.
  8. Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Health Science Journal, 5(1), 3–14.
  9. Helder, O. K., Jefferies, R., & Fraser, J. (2010). Reducing nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care: A clinical intervention study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 16(5), 194–199.
  10. Khan, M., Ahmad, A., & Mehboob, R. (2015). Healthcare-associated infections: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 8(3), 209–216.
  11. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
  12. Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Lam, B. C., Lee, J., & Lau, Y. L. (2004). Hand hygiene practices in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 25(1), 13–15.
  14. Mathur, P. (2011). Hand hygiene: Back to the basics of infection control. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 134(5), 611–620.
  15. Mohesh, R. (2014). Knowledge and practice of hand hygiene among nurses and midwives. Nursing Journal of India, 105(6), 1–6.
  16. Nejad, S. B., Allegranzi, B., Syed, S. B., Ellis, B., & Pittet, D. (2011). Health-care-associated infection in Africa: A systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 757–765.
  17. Parmeggiani, C., Abbate, R., Marinelli, P., & Angelillo, I. F. (2010). Healthcare workers and hand hygiene: Knowledge, attitudes, and compliance in Italy. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10, 1–7.
  18. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2001). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Lippincott.
  19. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (7th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  20. Res, S., Shinde, S., & Mohite, S. (2017). Knowledge, attitude, and practice of hand hygiene among medical and nursing students in India. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 10(2), 1–7.
  21. Shinde, V., & Mohite, S. (2014). Hand hygiene knowledge and compliance among nursing staff: A study from tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Nursing Education, 6(1), 20–25.
  22. Shukla, A., Tyagi, S., & Gupta, R. (2016). Hand hygiene knowledge and compliance among primary healthcare personnel. Journal of Infection Prevention, 17(5), 242–248.
  23. SIAPS. (2013). Factors affecting adherence to hand hygiene practices. USAID.
  24. Uwaezuoke, S. C., & Obu, H. A. (2013). Nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units: Incidence and risk factors. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2013, 1–6.
  25. WHO. (2009a). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: First global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. World Health Organization.
  26. WHO. (2009b). Hand hygiene: Why, how, and when? World Health Organization.
  27. WHO. (2009c). Five moments for hand hygiene. World Health Organization.
  28. WHO. (2011). Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide: Clean care is safer care. World Health Organization.
  29. WHO. (2016). Health care-associated infections: Fact sheet. World Health Organization.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) significantly contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Proper hand hygiene is the most effective, simple, and cost-efficient measure for preventing HCAIs, yet compliance among healthcare workers remains suboptimal.  Objective: To assess handwashing knowledge, practices, and barriers among nurses and midwives for infection prevention in neonatology and maternity departments at Ruhengeri District Hospital, Rwanda.  Methods: A quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The study population included 56 nurses and midwives, with a convenience sample of 50 participants. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire divided into four sections: socio-demographics, knowledge, practices, and barriers. Knowledge items were adapted from WHO Hand Hygiene Guidelines, while practices and barriers were based on CDC and WHO recommendations. Validity was confirmed through expert review, and reliability via a pilot study (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to assess associations.  Results: The majority of participants (72%) demonstrated good knowledge of hand hygiene, while 28% had moderate knowledge. Regarding practices, 46% had good practice, 36% moderate, and 18% poor practice, with a mean practice score of 71.27%. Alcohol-based hand rub was routinely used by 62%, and only 28% had received formal hand hygiene training in the last three years. A significant association was found between department of work and handwashing practice (p = 0.012).  Conclusion: Nurses and midwives exhibit good knowledge but variable hand hygiene practices. Continuous training, policy reinforcement, and monitoring are essential to improve compliance and reduce HCAIs in neonatal care settings in Rwanda.

Keywords : Hand Hygiene, Infection Prevention, Nurses, Midwives, Neonatology, Rwanda, Healthcare-Associated Infections.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe