Life Skills Development in Learners with and Without Pre-Grade R Experiences


Authors : Malise Tshimangadzo Precious; Mulovhedzi Shonisani Agnes

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yuujpmh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2npym7w5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1083

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : In numerous South African classes, learners enter Grade R with different levels of experience in early childhood education, which can impact their capability to adjust into formal learning environments and participate in important life skills activities. This study aimed to explore how life skills are developed in Grade R learners with and without pre-Grade R experience. A qualitative research approach was used along with Bronfenbrenner ecological system theory. The population of the study was Grade R teachers. A purposive sampling method was used to select eight teachers from four schools in the Nzhelele Area that had multiple Grade R classes. Data collection was done through semi structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings suggested that learners who attended pre-Grade R exhibited more school readiness, improved social communication skills, and early acquisition of crucial skills, compared to those without such exposure. They also show early literacy development and emotional regulation due to structured early learning environments.

Keywords : Early Childhood Education, Learner’s Diversity, Life Skills, Pre-Grade R, School Readiness.

References :

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press.
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Sage Publications.
  3. Cameron, C. (2020). Inclusive Practices in Early Childhood Education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 18(3), 234–247.
  4. Chigudu, D. (2023). Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research: A guide for educational researchers. Journal of Education and Social Research, 13(1), 102–110.
  5. Chigudu, D. (2023). Ethical frameworks in educational research: Understanding respect and protection in vulnerable settings. Journal of Educational Ethics, 5(1), 55–63.
  6. Chigudu, D. (2023). Paradigms in educational research: A conceptual analysis of interpretivism and its application. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(2), 89–98.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. DBE (2019). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS): Foundation Phase.
  9. DBE (2022). Early Childhood Development Quality Assurance Framework.
  10. DBE. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS): Foundation Phase – Life Skills. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
  11. DBE. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS): Life Skills Foundation Phase. Department of Basic Education.
  12. DBE. (2022). National Curriculum Framework for Children from Birth to Four. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
  13. DBE. (2022). National Curriculum Framework for Children from Birth to Four.
  14. DBE. (2023). Framework for Integrating ECD into Basic Education. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
  15. DBE. (2023). Framework for Integrating ECD into Basic Education.
  16. Department of Basic Education. (2021). National Curriculum Framework for Children from Birth to Four. Pretoria: DBE.
  17. Hall, K., & Woolner, S. (2021). Early Childhood Education in South Africa: Progress and Challenges. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102392.
  18. Heath, S., & Roach, M. (2020). Creative expression and emotional intelligence in early childhood. Early Education Journal, 28(2), 55–67.
  19. Heckman, J. J. (2019). The Economics of Early Childhood Development: The Future of Our Workforce. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1–12.
  20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
  21. Maree, K. (Ed.). (2022). First steps in research (3rd ed.). Van Schaik Publishers.
  22. Mkhize, N., & Nxumalo, M. (2021). Teacher Preparedness for Foundation Phase Education. South African Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–12.
  23. Motshekga, A. (2021). Ministerial Address on ECD and Grade R Readiness.
  24. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Ensuring quality in qualitative research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (3rd ed., pp. 114–123). Van Schaik Publishers.
  25. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Ethical issues in qualitative research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (3rd ed., pp. 45–55). Van Schaik Publishers.
  26. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Introducing qualitative research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (3rd ed., pp. 56–79). Van Schaik Publishers.
  27. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Qualitative research designs and data-gathering techniques. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (3rd ed., pp. 80–113). Van Schaik Publishers.
  28. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Understanding learner development and educational context. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (pp. 34–54). Van Schaik Publishers.
  29. Nkonyane, S. & Makalela, L. (2020). Holistic Development in Foundation Phase Classrooms. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1–10.
  30. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013660
  32. OECD. (2021). Starting strong VI: Supporting meaning-making and well-being in early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b90bba16-en
  33. Pham, L. T. (2021). A review of key paradigms: Positivism, interpretivism and critical inquiry. European
  34. Journal of Education Studies, 8(3), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i3.3658
  35. Pienaar, A. E., Du Toit, L., & Truter, L. (2021). Motor skills development in early years education. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(1), 12–17.
  36. Rademeyer, N., & Jacklin, H. (2023). Early Childhood Education Access in Rural South Africa. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(15), 1–19.
  37. Sonn, C., & Franks, C. (2019). School Readiness and Early Childhood Learning Inequities. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 9(2), 1–9.
  38. Taylor, S., & Vinjevold, P. (2022). The Quality of Early Learning in South African ECD Centres. South African Educational Review, 27(4), 443–460. Cameron, C. (2020). Inclusive practices in early childhood education. Journal of       Early Childhood Research, 18(3), 234–247.
  39. Taylor, S., & Vinjevold, P. (2022). The quality of early learning in South African ECD centres. South African Educational Review, 27(4), 443–460.
  40. Taylor, S., & Vinjevold, P. (2022). The Quality of Early Learning in South African ECD Centres.
  41. Thrive by Five Index. (2022). Baseline Study of Early Learning in South Africa.
  42. Thrive by Five Index. (2022). South Africa’s baseline study on early learning. Johannesburg: Innovation Edge.
  43. UNESCO. (2021). Life Skills Education for All Learners.
  44. UNICEF. (2021). Skills for Life: Building resilience in learners.
  45. Van der Berg, S., & Spaull, N. (2022). Early learning inequality in South Africa: A policy and implementation review. Research on Socio-Economic Policy (RESEP), Stellenbosch University.
  46. Van der Berg, S., Girdwood, E., & Shepherd, D. (2019). The impact of Grade R on learner outcomes in South Africa.
  47. Van Niekerk, J., & Jacklin, H. (2023). Early childhood education access in rural South Africa. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(15), 1–19.
  48. Van Niekerk, J., & Jacklin, H. (2023). ECD Access and Rural Disparities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(15).
  49. Van Staden, M. (2021). Grade R Teachers’ Experiences of Implementing the Life Skills Curriculum. South African Journal of Education, 41(4), 1–12.
  50. WHO. (2020). Early childhood development and life skills. Geneva: World Health Organization.

In numerous South African classes, learners enter Grade R with different levels of experience in early childhood education, which can impact their capability to adjust into formal learning environments and participate in important life skills activities. This study aimed to explore how life skills are developed in Grade R learners with and without pre-Grade R experience. A qualitative research approach was used along with Bronfenbrenner ecological system theory. The population of the study was Grade R teachers. A purposive sampling method was used to select eight teachers from four schools in the Nzhelele Area that had multiple Grade R classes. Data collection was done through semi structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings suggested that learners who attended pre-Grade R exhibited more school readiness, improved social communication skills, and early acquisition of crucial skills, compared to those without such exposure. They also show early literacy development and emotional regulation due to structured early learning environments.

Keywords : Early Childhood Education, Learner’s Diversity, Life Skills, Pre-Grade R, School Readiness.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - January - 2026

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe