Authors : Tuuma, Dumka K.; J. C. Imegi; Adamgbo, S. L. C.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/tna5dksp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2c5bkkve

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug144

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study examined the effect of liquidity regulation on the performance of commercial banks in Nigeria over the period 1990 to 2025. The specific objectives were to ascertain the effect of liquidity regulation on bank profitability, operational efficiency and market valuation, proxied respectively by Return on Assets (ROA), Cost-to-Income Ratio (CIR) and Market Capitalisation (MCAP). Liquidity regulation was measured using the Liquidity Ratio (LR) and the Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR). Anchored on the Liquidity Preference and Liability Management theories, the study adopted an ex post facto research design and employed the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach to cointegration, given the mixed order of integration of the variables. Secondary time-series data were sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Statistical Bulletin, CBN Financial Stability Reports and the Nigerian Exchange Group. The findings revealed that the Liquidity Ratio exerted a positive and statistically significant long-run effect on profitability and a negative significant effect on the Costto-Income Ratio, indicating that stronger liquidity buffers enhanced both earnings and operational efficiency. Conversely, the Loan-to-Deposit Ratio had a negative significant effect on profitability and a positive significant effect on the Cost-to-Income Ratio, suggesting that aggressive credit expansion relative to the deposit base eroded performance. The bounds test confirmed a long-run cointegrating relationship between liquidity regulation and market valuation; however, the individual coefficients of LR and LDR on MCAP were statistically insignificant, implying that investor valuation in Nigeria is driven more by profitability and macroeconomic conditions than by liquidity indicators. The study concluded that liquidity regulation is a significant determinant of bank profitability and efficiency but a weak direct driver of market valuation. It was recommended, amongst others, that the CBN should periodically recalibrate the minimum liquidity ratio in line with macroeconomic conditions, and that bank managers should adopt dynamic asset-liability management frameworks to balance regulatory compliance with profitability objectives.

Keywords : Liquidity Regulation; Bank Performance; Liquidity Ratio; Loan-To-Deposit Ratio; ARDL; Nigeria.

References :

1. Abdullah, M., Koroma, S. M., & Kamara, A. B. (2024). Prudential regulations and financial performance of commercial banks in Sierra Leone. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 12(3), 45-67.
2. Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissimis, S. N., & Delis, M. D. (2008). Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001
3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2019). Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms. Bank for International Settlements.
4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel III monitoring report. Bank for International Settlements.
5. Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779-3837. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104
6. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2023). Financial stability report. CBN Publications.
7. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2024). Annual statistical bulletin. CBN Publications.
8. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2025). Financial stability report. CBN Publications.
9. Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1086/261155
10. Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2005). Liquidity shortages and banking crises. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 615-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00741.x
11. Fama, E. F. (2021). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. In The state of economic theory, 25-58. Routledge.
12. Ibrahim, M., & Alhassan, A. L. (2024). Banking sector liquidity and market valuation in emerging economies. African Finance Journal, 26(1), 55–78.
13. Ighoroje, E. J., & Akpokerere, F. E. (2018). Liquidity management and banks' performance in Nigeria (1980-2017). Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 4(3), 1-15.
14. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.
15. Kosmidou, K. (2008). The determinants of banks' profits in Greece during the period of EU financial integration. Managerial Finance, 34(3), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350810848036
16. Osondu-Ekekwe, C. F., Onwumere, J. U., & Ibe, G. I. (2026). Liquidity regulation and financial stability in Nigeria: A bounds testing approach. Nigerian Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(1), 22-41.
17. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
18. Poole, W. (1968). Commercial bank reserve management in a stochastic model: Implications for monetary policy. Journal of Finance, 23(5), 769-791.
19. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
20. Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2009). Bank specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability: Empirical evidence from the China banking sector. Frontiers of Economics in China, 4(2), 274-291.
21. Trujillo-Ponce, A. (2013). What determines the profitability of banks? Evidence from Spain. Accounting & Finance, 53(2), 561-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00466.x
22. Yaaba, B. N., & Sanusi, A. R. (2020). Capital adequacy and bank risk-taking behaviour in Nigeria. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 11(2), 89-114.