Authors :
Mary Joy M. Esoy; Mary Daphne P. Silvestre
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5dransft
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/9fpc98bs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1154
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Effective school management is essential in achieving educational goals, particularly in integrated schools where
multiple grade levels are supervised under one administration. Along this view, this study explored the management
practices of school heads in Integrated Schools of Malaybalay City division, school year 2024-2025. Following the research
design of transcendental phenomenology, the data were gathered through in-depth interviews, which revealed five
management practices of the school heads in integrated schools: promoting fairness while meeting each department’s
unique needs, flexibility in responding to urgent tasks and respecting teachers’ personal circumstances, delegating tasks
and fostering teamwork to ease workload, coping with poor facilities, unequal resources, and limited funding, and
emphasizing equitable opportunities for professional growth. The participants encountered challenges: difficulties in
fostering teacher cooperation and participation, leadership challenges in integrated school management, incorporating
technology and providing digital assistance, promoting equity through student-focused education. With the challenges
encountered, the schools’ heads coped through managing time, tasks, and priorities through scheduling, delegation, and
organization; engaging teachers, parents, and stakeholders in collective decision-making, identifying problems,
prioritizing solutions, and applying evidence-based strategies; adjusting to diverse personalities, needs, and unexpected
challenges with flexibility; and, integrating technology and data-driven tools to enhance efficiency and outcomes.
Keywords :
School Head, Integrated School, Management Practices, Challenges Encountered, Coping Mechanism.
References :
- A. Acharyya, “Overcoming 10 challenges that every school principal faces,” Vawsum.com, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://vawsum.com
- E. A. Alampay and M. T. Capule-Navarro, Provision of electricity and internet access in DepEd schools: Implications on school performance and digital inclusivity in the new normal. Manila, Philippines: UP CIDS, 2023.
- R. E. Anderson and S. L. Dexter, “School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect,” Educ. Admin. Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–82, 2005.
- M. A. N. Anduyo, “School administrators’ management approaches and performance of teachers,” Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 5, no. 7, 2025.
- P. J. G. Arambala, “Leadership competencies of school heads: A systematic literature review,” EPRA Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 11, no. 7, 2025.
- Asian Development Bank, Digital learning and infrastructure support project: Philippines. Manila, Philippines: ADB, 2023.
- K. T. Asiimwe, “The role and impact of collaborative decision-making in schools,” Res. Invent. J. Curr. Issues Arts Manag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 20–23, 2025.
- E. I. Banua, N. S. Iglesia, and V. C. Muarip, “School administrators’ instructional leadership: Basis for pedagogical enhancement,” Int. J. Health Sci., vol. 6, no. S7, pp. 2131–2145, 2022.
- A. Banywana, “Effective delegation techniques for school administrators,” Res. Invent. J. Curr. Issues Arts Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2025.
- D. Bebell and L. M. O’Dwyer, “Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings,” J. Technol. Learn. Assess., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2010.
- T. Bush, Leadership and management development in education. London, U.K.: SAGE, 2008.
- A. C. Campbell, “A guide to coping mechanisms and how to practice healthy ones,” Better.com, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://better.com/blog/coping-mechanisms
- A. L. Caritativo and S. F. Fernandez, “School leaders’ instructional and administrative competencies,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2738–2750, 2022.
- S. R. Covey, The 7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1989.
- L. Darling-Hammond, M. LaPointe, D. Meyerson, M. T. Orr, and C. Cohen, Preparing principals for a changing world. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
- Department of Education, DepEd Memorandum No. 291, s. 2008. Manila, Philippines: DepEd, 2008.
- J. Dewey, Experience and education. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan, 1938.
- M. Fullan, The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2007.
- G. Gay, Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2010.
- Glassdoor Team, “Administrative tasks and most common administrative tasks in the workplace,” Glassdoor, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.glassdoor.com
- D. Goleman, “Leadership that gets results,” Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 78–90, 2000.
- J. A. Grissom and S. Loeb, “Triangulating principal effectiveness,” Amer. Educ. Res. J., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1091–1123, 2011.
- P. Hallinger, “Leadership for learning,” J. Educ. Admin., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 125–142, 2011.
- A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, Professional capital. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2012.
- R. A. Heifetz and R. Linsky, Leadership on the line. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Press, 2002.
- P. Hersey and K. H. Blanchard, Management of organizational behavior, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
- Indeed Editorial Team, “6 common examples of administrative tasks,” Indeed, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://au.indeed.com
- G. Jones, Evidence-based school leadership and management. London, U.K.: SAGE, 2014.
- J. T. Lanier, “Redefining the role of the teacher,” Edutopia, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.edutopia.org
- K. Leithwood, “A review of evidence about equitable school leadership,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, 2021.
Effective school management is essential in achieving educational goals, particularly in integrated schools where
multiple grade levels are supervised under one administration. Along this view, this study explored the management
practices of school heads in Integrated Schools of Malaybalay City division, school year 2024-2025. Following the research
design of transcendental phenomenology, the data were gathered through in-depth interviews, which revealed five
management practices of the school heads in integrated schools: promoting fairness while meeting each department’s
unique needs, flexibility in responding to urgent tasks and respecting teachers’ personal circumstances, delegating tasks
and fostering teamwork to ease workload, coping with poor facilities, unequal resources, and limited funding, and
emphasizing equitable opportunities for professional growth. The participants encountered challenges: difficulties in
fostering teacher cooperation and participation, leadership challenges in integrated school management, incorporating
technology and providing digital assistance, promoting equity through student-focused education. With the challenges
encountered, the schools’ heads coped through managing time, tasks, and priorities through scheduling, delegation, and
organization; engaging teachers, parents, and stakeholders in collective decision-making, identifying problems,
prioritizing solutions, and applying evidence-based strategies; adjusting to diverse personalities, needs, and unexpected
challenges with flexibility; and, integrating technology and data-driven tools to enhance efficiency and outcomes.
Keywords :
School Head, Integrated School, Management Practices, Challenges Encountered, Coping Mechanism.