Authors : Dr. Ananya R. M.; Dr. Srinidhi Bhat

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3jnvj9u8

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/rcc9p6ch

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1715

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Restoring missing central incisors in the mandibular jaw is a challenging esthetic challenge in dentistry, especially for younger patients. Maryland bridges are a highly effective treatment option, restoring oral function and aesthetics, and resulting in high patient satisfaction. These bridges have advantages over conventional fixed dental prosthesis, such as minimal removal of the tooth structure, minimal pulpal trauma risk, and reduced time and cost. Provisional restorations are usually not required. Maryland bridges are cemented to the abutment tooth using electrolytic etching to retain the metal framework. The bond is strengthened after etching, and the development of resin cements has enhanced bridge retention. A missing anterior tooth poses an esthetic, functional, and rehabilitative problem, especially for younger patients. Resin bonded bridges are minimally invasive, offering advantages such as minimal removal of the tooth structure, minimal pulpal trauma risk, and reduced time and cost. This case report describes the fabrication technique for a single missing lower anterior tooth, focusing on conservative, economical, and esthetic treatment outcomes.

Keywords : Maryland Bridge, Minimally Invasive, Congenitally Missing Teeth, Resin – Bonded Fixed Partial Denture.

References :

[1]. Ahmad M, Naim H, Adawi AM, Siddiq A, Mayidi
HM, Hakami YH. A conservative approach to
replace missing teeth in the aesthetic zone with
Maryland bridge – a case report. Dent Oral Craniofac
Res. 2017:3:1-3.
[2]. Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior fixed partial
dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast
metal framework. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 28-31.
[3]. Burgess JO, McCartney JG: Anterior retainer design
for resin bonded acid-etched fixed partial dentures. J.
Prosthet. Dent. 1989 Apr; 61(4): 433–436.
[4]. Saunders WP: Resin bonded bridgework: a review. J.
Dent. 1989 Dec; 17(6): 255–265.
[5]. Balasubramaniam GR: Predictability of resin bonded
bridges – a systematic review. Br. Dent. J. 2017 Jun;
222(11): 849–858.
[6]. Shilingburg HT, Hobo S (1997) Fundamentals of
fixed prosthodontics, 3rd edition, Quintessence
Publishing Co Inc, IL, USA.
[7]. Jenkins CB (1985) The bond strength of new
adhesive recommended for resin-bonded bridges. J
Dent Res 64: 664.
[8]. Chan AWK, Barnes IE: A prospective study of
cantilever resin bonded bridges: An initial report.
Aust. Dent. J. 2000 Mar; 45(1): 31–36.
[9]. Durey KA, Nixon PJ, Robinson S, et al.: Resin
bonded bridges: techniques for success. Br. Dent. J.
2011 Aug; 211(3): 113–118.
[10]. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, YK
Kan J. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 31-41.

[11]. Pjetursson B E, Tan W C, Tan K, Bragger U,
Zwahlen M, Lang N P. A systematic review of the
survival and complication rates of resin-bonded
bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years.
Clin Oral Implants Res2008; 19(2):131–141.
[12]. Negi P, Jaikaria A. Rehabilitation of patient with
missing anterior tooth with Maryland bridge: A case
report. Int J Res Rev. 2020;7(6):1-3.