Authors : Festus Kambona Kathenya; Dr. Peterson Mutembei Kugeria; Dr. Fidelis Ngugi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y8bzd38c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/wwbj3623

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1380

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Clay soils, which possess expansive characteristics, are known to be problematic in construction due to their low strength, poor load-carrying capacity, and high shrink-swell potential. These clay soils undergo substantial volume changes due to variations in moisture content, which can cause instabilities in structures such as foundations, pavements, and other civil constructions. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) stabilization has proven to be a popular solution. However, the high cost of production makes it very expensive and less affordable. Therefore, alternative methods, which are cost-effective and more sustainable, require investigation. This paper has investigated the behavior of expansive clay soil stabilized under Sorghum Husk Ash (SHA)-Blended cement with the focus on its Atterberg limits, compaction properties, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). Soil samples were collected from Nkondi ward in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya, and sorghum husks were sourced from Mwanyani location, Tharaka Nithi county. The samples were calcined and mixed with 40% cement to make blended cement composed of clinker (40%), calcined clay (20%), sorghum husk ash (20%), limestone (15%), and gypsum (5%). Tests were conducted in the laboratory by using AASHTO T-180 standards. This study investigated the engineering properties of a soil sample through particle size distribution, Atterberg limits, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and swell potential tests, following BS 1377 and AASHTO standards. The particle size distribution showed that 62.6% of the fines passed through the 0.075 mm sieve, indicating a predominance of fine particles. Atterberg limits gave a liquid limit of 44.3%, a plastic limit of 28.1%, and a plasticity index of 16.2%, confirming measurable plasticity. Compaction results using AASHTO T-180 revealed a maximum dry density of 1.593 g/cm3 at an optimum moisture content of 21.7%. The CBR test values increased with compaction effort, ranging from 23.8% at low compaction to 88.7% at high compaction, while swell potential decreased from 0.65% to 0.13%. According to the study, sorghum husk ash-modified cement successfully enhanced the engineering properties of expansive clay by improving compaction properties, increasing bearing capacity, and preventing material swelling. This SHA-Blended cement can offer an economical and sustainable substitute to OPC in soil stabilization.

Keywords : Expansive Clay, Sorghum Husk Ash, Soil Stabilization, California Bearing Ratio, Compaction.

References :

1. Moko, W. H. O. S. K. (2014). Determinants of House Construction Cost in Kenya: A Case of Nairobi County. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 4(01), 19–36. www.ijbcnet.comwww.ijbcnet.com
2. Ajagbe, W. O., Tijani, M. A., & Agbede, O. A. (2018). Compressive strength of concrete made from aggregates of different sources. USEP: Journal of Research Information in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 1963–1974.
3. Ogork, E. N., & Ibrahim, T. S. (2017). Properties of cement paste and concrete containing calcium carbide waste as additive. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 36(1), 26–31.
4. Onsongo, S. K., Olukuru, J., Munyao, O. M., & Mwabonje, O. (2025). The role of agricultural ashes (rice husk ash, coffee husk ash, sugarcane bagasse ash, palm oil fuel ash) in cement production for sustainable development in Africa. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00841-6
5. Williams, F. N., Anum, I., Isa, R. B., & Aliyu, M. (2014). Properties of sorghum husk ash blended cement laterized concrete. International Journal of Research in Management, Science and Technology, 2(2), 73–79.
6. Makusa, G. P. (2012). Soil stabilization methods and materials: State of the art review. Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.
7. Asgari, M. R., Baghebanzadeh, D. A., & Bayat, M. (2015). Experimental study on stabilization of a low plasticity clayey soil with cement/lime. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(3), 1439–1452.
8. Yilmaz, Y., & Ozaydin, V. (2013). Compaction and shear strength characteristics of colemanite ore waste modified active belite cement stabilized high plasticity soils. Engineering Geology, 155, 45–53.
9. Cuisinier, O., Auriol, J. C., Borgne, T. L., & Deneele, D. (2011). Microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of a compacted lime-treated soil. Engineering Geology, 123(3), 187–193.
10. Brindley, G. W., & Nakahira, M. (1959). The kaolinite-mullite reaction series: I. Survey of outstanding problems. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 42(7), 311–314.
11. Sayanam, R. A., Kalsotra, A. K., Mehta, S. K., Sing, R. S., & Mandal, G. (1989). Studies on thermal transformations and pozzolanic activities of clay from Jammu region, India. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 35, 9–106.
12. Kugeria, M. P., Muriithi, N. T., & Muthengia, J. W. (2014). Iron enrichment in laterites soils from selected regions in Kenya using magnetic separation. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 4(3), 42–48. https://www.iosrjen.org
13. De Silva, P. S., & Glasser, F. P. (1990). Hydration of cements based on metakaolin: Thermochemistry. Advances in Cement Research, 3(12), 167–177.
14. Dunster, A. M., Parsonage, J. R., & Thomas, M. J. K. (1993). The pozzolanic reaction of metakaolin and its effects on Portland cement hydration. Journal of Materials Science, 28, 1345–1350.
15. Ambroise, J., Murat, M., & Pera, J. (1986). Investigations on synthetic binders obtained by middle-temperature thermal dissociation of clay minerals. Silicates Industries, 7(8), 99–107.
16. Ambroise, J., Murat, M., & Pera, J. (1985). Hydration reaction and hardening of calcined clays and related minerals: V. Extension of the research and general conclusions. Cement and Concrete Research, 15, 261–268.
17. Marwan, T., Pera, J., & Ambroise, J. (1992). The action of some aggressive solutions on Portland and calcined laterite blended cement concretes. In V. M. Malhotra (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete (Vol. I, pp. 763–779). Istanbul, Turkey.
18. Kugeria, P. M., Mwangi, I., Wachira, J., & Njoroge, P. (2018). Copper extraction by wet chemical method. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(5), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2018.07.003
19. ASTM D6913– Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis
20. East African Community Secretariat Catalogue of East African Standards (2023) Adoption By Partner States Withdrawn. http://www.eac.int/
21. AASHTO-T99-T180 Moisture-Density Relations of Soils; AASHTO: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Volume 310, pp. 1–12.
22. BS 1377-9:1990; Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes—Part 2: Classification Tests. British Standard Institutions: London, UK, 2020.
23. Chen, F. H. (2015). Foundations on Expansive Soils. Elsevier.
24. Mitchell, J. K., & Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of Soil Behavior (3rd ed.). Wiley.
25. Provis, J.L., & van Deventer, J.S.J. (2014). Alkali Activated Materials: State-of-the-Art Report, RILEM TC 224-AAM. Springer.
26. Taylor, H.F.W. (1997). Cement Chemistry. 2nd Edition. Thomas Telford.
27. Scrivener, K. L., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017
28. Snellings, R., Mertens, G., & Elsen, J. (2012). Supplementary cementitious materials. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 74(1), 211–278. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2012.74.6
29. Sabir, B. B., Wild, S., & Bai, J. (2001). Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 23(6), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00092-5
30. Shehata, M. H., & Thomas, M. D. A. (2000). The effect of fly ash composition on the expansion of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(7), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00283-0
31. ASTM C618. (2019). Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19
32. Cordeiro, G. C., Toledo Filho, R. D., Tavares, L. M., & Fairbairn, E. M. R. (2009). Pozzolanic activity and filler effect of sugar cane bagasse ash in Portland cement and lime mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(9),586–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001
33. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
34. James, J., & Rao, M. S. (2016). Characterization of agricultural wastes for sustainable concrete. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.042
35. Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (2008). Soil Mechanics. Wiley.
36. Al-Mukhtar, M., Khattab, S., & Alcover, J. F. (2012). Microstructure and geotechnical properties of lime-treated expansive clayey soil. Applied Clay Science, 55, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.10.011
37. Amadi, A. A. (2010). Evaluation of changes in index and compaction properties of lateritic soil stabilized with fly ash. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 17, 69–78.
38. Kenya Road Design Manual, Part III: Materials and Pavement Design for New Roads — classification of subgrade bearing strength, minimum CBR and swell requirements (https://www.scribd.com/document/29735655/).