Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Enterprises in Nigeria


Authors : Egegwu Unogwu Emmanuel; Lau Yeng Wai; Ong Tse San; Murali Sambansivan

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2s49rnpj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/48xteh6s

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1909

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The goal of this study is to find out what role corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays in the connection between corporate governance (CG) and the success of Nigerian manufacturing companies. This study also looks at how corporate governance (CG) affects the financial and non-financial success of Nigerian manufacturing businesses. We use agency theory (AT) and shareholder theory (ST) to back up the connections we think exist. The study methodology is cross- sectional, and samples were chosen at random. Quantitative analysis was done on the 280 acceptable questionnaire answers that were collected. In order to look at the data, Smart-PLS 3.3.9 was used with partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-ESM). The most important results show that CG not only affects CSR but is also strongly linked to both financial and non-financial success. CSR also acts as a go-between for the link between CG and both financial and non- financial success. The study's results show that the link between AT and ST makes sense for CSR to play a part in the model that was tried. This theoretical addition is what the study gives us. There were some suggestions made that could help managers do their jobs better. Because it is based on Nigeria, the study is limited in what it can say. In the future, researchers may use a continuous method to learn more about the subject.

Keywords : Nigeria, Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance, Nonfinancial Performance.

References :

  1. Abbas, J. (2024). Does the nexus of corporate social responsibility and green dynamic capabilities drive firms toward green technological innovation? The moderating role of green transformational leadership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123698.
  2. Abbas, J., 2020. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242, 118458.
  3. Adedeji, B. S., Uzir, M. U. H., Rahman, M. M., & Jerin, I. (2019). Corporate governance and           non-financial performance of medium-sized firms in Nigeria: A CB-SEM       approach, Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(2), 156-168.
  4. Adewuyi, A. O., & Olowookere, A. E. (2013). New corporate code and immediate performance change of the Nigerian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(2), 169-183.
  5. Affes, W., & Jarboui, A. (2023). The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(4), 374–394.
  6. Aftab, J., Abid, N., Sarwar, H., Amin, A., Abedini, M., & Veneziani, M. (2024). Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 1634–1653.
  7. Afzali, S. M., & Kettunen, J. (2019). Board Centrality and Firm Performance: Evidence      from Private Firms. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344238.
  8. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057-1086.
  9. Ahmad, N., Scholz, M., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Sabir, R. I., & Khan, W. A. (2021). The nexus of CSR and co-creation: A roadmap towards consumer loyalty. Sustainability 2021, 13, 523.
  10. Al-Matari, Y. A., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H. B., Fadzil, H., & Al-Matari, E. M.               (2012). Board of directors, audit committee characteristics and the      performance of Saudi Arabia            listed companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(4), 241-251.
  11. Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Barani, O., Moghaddam, M., & Sidhu, J. (2021). The role of sustainability control systems in translating CSR into performance in Iran. Management Decision.
  12. Assankutty, A., Fatima, F., & Kuntluru, S. (2019). Does corporate governance disclosure practice impact firm performance in India? SUMEDHA Journal of Management8(4), 1-14.
  13. Awa, H. O., Etim, W., & Ogbonda, E. (2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1), 11.
  14. Baird, K., Su, S. and Munir, R. (2019), “Levers of control, management innovation and organisational performance”, Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 358-375.
  15. Bahoo, S., Ahmed, F., Shoukat, A., & Ahmad, M. (2019). Impact of corporate governance on           American corporates' financial performance: The mediating role of derivatives, Journal              of Independent Studies & Research: Management & Social Sciences & Economics,           17(1), 125-148.
  16. Barauskaite, G. and Streimikiene, D. (2021), “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: the puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 278-287.
  17. Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research28, 12-30.
  18. Bhatt, P. R., & Bhatt, R. R. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
  19. Blasco, J. L., & King, A. (2017). The road ahead: The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. Zurich: KPMG International. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
  20. Braune, E., Charosky, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, financial performance and risk in times of economic instability. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(4), 1007– 1021.
  21. Brogi, M., & Lagasio, V. (2018). Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 576–587.
  22. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  23. Cheng, H., & Ding, H. (2021). Dynamic game of corporate social responsibility in a supply chain with competition. Journal of Cleaner Production317, 128398.
  24. Chenhall R.H. (2003), Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future, Accounting Organization Society, 28, 2-3, pp. 127-168.
  25. Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2019). Study on the relationship between CSR and financial performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 343.
  26. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1-33.
  27. Coehlo, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 1–26.
  28. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
  29. Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252
  30. Crifo, P., Escrig-Olmedo, E., & Mottis, N. (2019). Corporate governance as a key driver of                corporate sustainability in France: The role of board members and investor relations,      Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1127-1146.
  31. Desender, K., & Epure, M. (2021). The pressure behind corporate social performance: Ownership and institutional configurations. Global Strategy Journal, 11(2), 210–244’.
  32. Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Zaid, M. A., & Tormo-Carbó, G. (2022). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: mapping the most critical drivers in the board academic literature. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1705-1739.
  33. Epure, M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a signaling technology. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 907–930.
  34. Fabamise, O. (2019). Assessing efforts to revive Nigeria’s textile industry. Retrieved from https://leadership.ng/2019/01/08/assessing-efforts-to-revive-nigerias-textile-industry/.
  35. Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability14(3), 1222.
  36. Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 42–66.
  37. Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifocus outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 954–985.
  38. Fernandes, F. D. S., Sermpinis, G., Stasinakis, C., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm survival: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. British Journal of Management35(2), 1014-1039.
  39. Fernandes, S. M., Bornia, A. C., & Nakamura, L. R. (2018). The influence of boards of directors on environmental disclosure. Management Decision.
  40. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pittman, Boston, MA.
  41. Gadenne, D., Mia, L., Sands, J., Winata, L., & Hooi, G. (2012). The influence of sustainability performance management practices on organisational sustainability performance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change8(2), 210-235.
  42. Gharbi, M., & Jarboui, A. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm financial performance: does corporate governance matter? International Journal of Law and Management66(6), 681-693.
  43. Giannopoulos, G., Pilcher, N., & Salmon, I. (2024). What is the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the UK banking sector? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(5), 187.
  44. Gong, Y., Yan, C., & Ho, K. (2021). The effect of managerial ability on corporate social responsibility and firm value in the energy industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 581–594.
  45. Guluma, T. F. (2021). The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: The influences of managerial overconfidence. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1–18.
  46. Gupta, M., Kumar, V., & Singh, M. (2014). Creating satisfied employees through                 workplace             spirituality: A study of the private insurance sector in Punjab (India). Journal of              Business Ethics, 122(1), 79-88.
  47. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science45(5), 616-632.
  48. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  49. Hilmer, F. G. (1998).  Strictly boardroom. Melbourne, Australia: Information Australia
  50. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal20(2), 195-204.
  51. Ikram, M., Zhou, P., Shah, S.A.A., Liu, G.Q., 2019. Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production. 226, 628-641.
  52. Jamali, D. and Karam, C. (2018), “Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 32-61.
  53. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Vaish, A., Vaishya, R., & Iyengar, K. P. (2020). Robotics applications in COVID-19: A review. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management.
  54. Javed, M., Rashid, M.A., Hussain, G. and Ali, H.Y. (2020), “The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: moderating role of responsible leadership”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 1395-1409.
  55. Javeed, S. A., Latief, R., Jiang, T., San Ong, T., & Tang, Y. (2021). How environmental regulations and corporate social responsibility affect the firm innovation with the moderating role of Chief executive officer (CEO) power and ownership concentration? Journal of Cleaner Production, 308, 127212.
  56. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3(4), 305-360
  57. Kajola, S. O. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed          firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 14(14),      16-28.
  58. Kallunki, J. P., Laitinen, E. K., & Silvola, H. (2011). Impact of enterprise resource planning systems on management control systems and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), 20-39.
  59. Kemper, A., & Martin, R. L. (2010). After the fall: The global financial crisis as a test of corporate social responsibility theories. European Management Review, 7(4), 229-239.
  60. Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage
  61. Li, J., & Xu, X. (2024). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 35(1), 116–122.
  62. Lin, W. L., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I., & Lee, C. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved firm performance? The hidden role of financial slack. Social Responsibility Journal16(7), 957-982.
  63. Madanaguli, A., Srivastava, S., Ferraris, A., & Dhir, A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in the tourism sector: A systematic literature review and future outlook. Sustainable Development, 30(3), 447-461.
  64. Manuel, T., & Herron, T. L. (2020). An ethical perspective of business CSR and the COVID-19 pandemic. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 235–253
  65. Marsudi, A. S., & Soetanto, G. P. (2020, September). The effect of good corporate governance [GCG] on disclosure of corporate social responsibility [CSR] and its implications on firm value. In International Conference on Management, Accounting, and Economy (ICMAE 2020) (pp. 95-98). Atlantis Press.
  66. Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84-93.
  67. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
  68. Mia, L., & Clarke, B. (1999). Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research, 10(2), 137-158.
  69. Mihret, D.G., James, K. and Mula, J.M. (2010), “Antecedents and organizational performance implications of internal audit effectiveness: some propositions and research agenda”, Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 224-252
  70. Mohy-ud-Din, K., & Raza, S. (2023). Role of board indexes on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and shareholders' wealth author links open overlay panel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136521.
  71. Mu, H.-L., Xu, J., & Chen, S. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility types on happiness management: A stakeholder theory perspective. Management Decision, 62(2), 591–613.
  72. Naciti, V. (2019), “Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 237,117727.
  73. Nasr, Mahmoud A., and Collins G. Ntim. 2018. Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting conservatism: Evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 18: 386–407
  74. Nguyen, P. A., Kecskés, A., & Mansi, S. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility create shareholder value? The importance of long-term investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105217.
  75. Nguyen, V. H., Agbola, F. W., & Choi, B. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility enhance financial performance? Evidence from Australia. Australian Accounting Review32(1), 5-18.
  76. Nordberg, D. and Booth, R. (2019), “Evaluating the effectiveness of corporate boards”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 372-387.
  77. Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & evaluation in higher education33(3), 301-314.
  78. Ofoegbu, G. N., Odoemelam, N., & Okafor, R. G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1551510.
  79. Okafor, A., Adeleye, B. N., & Adusei, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from US tech firms. Journal of cleaner production292, 126078.
  80. Okorie, O., Subramoniam, R., Charnley, F., Patsavellas, J., Widdifield, D., & Salonitis, K. (2020). Manufacturing in the time of COVID-19: An assessment of barriers and enablers. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 167–175.
  81. Opoku Marfo, E. (2024). Mechanisms and initiatives of corporate social responsibility behaviours in Ghana: a co-integration approach. Cogent Business & Management11(1), 2312580.
  82. Orij, R. P., Rehman, S., Khan, H., & Khan, F. (2021). Is CSR the new competitive environment for CEOs? The association between CEO turnover, corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: Asian evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and environmental management28(2), 731-747.
  83. Oware, K. M., & Mallikarjunappa, T. (2022). CSR expenditure, mandatory CSR reporting and financial performance of listed firms in India: an institutional theory perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research30(1), 1-21.
  84. Pantamee, A. A., & Ya'u, A. (2018). Effect of board size and board composition on firm performance in Nigerian petroleum marketing industry. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences 10(2), 131-143.
  85. Parsa, S., Dai, N., Belal, A., Li, T., & Tang, G. (2021). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Political, social and corporate influences. Accounting and Business Research, 51(1), 36–64.
  86. Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2020a). A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management., 51(2), 104–125.
  87. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  88. Pudjiastuti, W., & Mardiyah, A., Aida. (2007). The influence of board structure on company             performance. Paper presented at the Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, Makassar,   Indonesia.
  89. Rahi, A. F., Johansson, J., Blomkvist, M., & Hartwig, F. (2024). Corporate sustainability and financial performance: A hybrid literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 801–815.
  90. Rodrigues da Costa, L., & Maria Correia Loureiro, S. (2019). The importance of employees’ engagement on organizational success. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(3), 328-336.
  91. Saeed, A., Gull, A. A., Rind, A. A., Mubarik, M. S., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). Do socially responsible firms demand high-quality audits? International evidence. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 27(2), 2235–2255.
  92. Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350.
  93. Sahut, J. M., & Pasquini-Descomps, H. (2015). ESG impact on a firm's market performance. International Management, 19(2), 40–63.
  94. Sekhon, A. K., & Kathuria, L. M. (2019). Analyzing the corporate social responsibility disclosures of selected companies in India. Corporate Communications: An International Journal24(4), 686-701.
  95. Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F., & Demir, M. (2017). An evaluation of the quality of corporate social responsibility reports by some of the world’s largest financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(4), 787-805.
  96. Shahzad, M., Ying, Q., Ur Rehman, S., Zafar, A., Ding, X., Abbas, J., 2019. Impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on corporate sustainability with mediating role of CSR: analysis from the Asian context. Journal of Environment Planning and Management. 1-27.
  97. Sharma, E. (2019). A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing nations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 712-720.
  98. Shittu, I., Ahmad, A. C., & Ishak, Z. (2018). Audit committee independence, abnormal directors’ compensation, corporate governance disclosure and price to earnings multiple of Nigerian firms. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 11(2), 156-172.
  99. Singh, K., Abraham, R., Yadav, J., Agrawal, A. K., & Kolar, P. (2023). Linking CSR and organizational performance: the intervening role of sustainability risk management and organizational reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(10), 1830-1851.
  100. Su, S., Baird, K., & Schoch, H. (2015). The moderating effect of organizational life cycle stages on the association between the interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls with organizational performance. Management Accounting Research, 26, 40–53.
  101. Svensson, G., Ferro, C., Høgevold, N., Padin, C., Carlos Sosa Varela, J., Sarstedt, M., (2018). Framing the triple bottom line approach: direct and mediation effects between economic, social and environmental elements. Journal of Cleaner Production. 197, 972-991
  102. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics85(4), 411-427.
  103. Usman, O., & Yakubu, U. A. (2019). An investigation of the post-privatization firms’ financial performance in Nigeria: the role of corporate governance practices. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 404-418.
  104. Uwuigbe, U., Peter, D. S., & Oyeniyi, A. (2013). The effects of corporate governance         mechanisms on earnings management of listed firms in Nigeria. Accounting      
  105. Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S.H., Varma, R., (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud.       Financial Analysts Journal, 60(3), 33 – 43.
  106. van der Linden, B., & Freeman, R. E. (2017). Profit and other values: Thick evaluation in decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), 353–379.
  107. Van der Stede, W. A., Young, S. M., & Chen, C. X. (2005). Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(7-8), 655-684.
  108. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management13(1), 109-122.
  109. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997a). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder           relations. Business and Society, 36(3), 250-279.
  110. Wang, Q., Dou, J. and Jai, S. (2016) ‘A meta-analytic review of CSR and CFP: The moderating effect of contextual factors’, Business & Society, 55 (8), pp. 1083-1121
  111. Wang, Y., Lu, T., & Qiao, Y. (2021). The effect of air pollution on corporate social responsibility performance in high energy-consumption industry: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production280, 124345.
  112. Wang, Z., Jia, H., Xu, T., Xu, C., (2018). Manufacturing industrial structure and pollutant emission: an empirical study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 197, 462-471.
  113. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
  114. Xu, R., Lin, B., 2017. Why are there large regional differences in CO2 emissions? Evidence from China's manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140, 1330-1343.
  115. Zhao, X., Wu, C., Chen, C. C., & Zhou, Z. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibility on incumbent employees: A meta-analytic investigation of the mediating and moderating mechanisms. Journal of Management48(1), 114-146.
  116. Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S. and Maggina, A. (2018), “Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: evidence from Greece”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 31, pp. 20-36.

The goal of this study is to find out what role corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays in the connection between corporate governance (CG) and the success of Nigerian manufacturing companies. This study also looks at how corporate governance (CG) affects the financial and non-financial success of Nigerian manufacturing businesses. We use agency theory (AT) and shareholder theory (ST) to back up the connections we think exist. The study methodology is cross- sectional, and samples were chosen at random. Quantitative analysis was done on the 280 acceptable questionnaire answers that were collected. In order to look at the data, Smart-PLS 3.3.9 was used with partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-ESM). The most important results show that CG not only affects CSR but is also strongly linked to both financial and non-financial success. CSR also acts as a go-between for the link between CG and both financial and non- financial success. The study's results show that the link between AT and ST makes sense for CSR to play a part in the model that was tried. This theoretical addition is what the study gives us. There were some suggestions made that could help managers do their jobs better. Because it is based on Nigeria, the study is limited in what it can say. In the future, researchers may use a continuous method to learn more about the subject.

Keywords : Nigeria, Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance, Nonfinancial Performance.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe