Authors : Chanan Singh; Aryan Prashant Patil; Swapniket Sunil Mahajan

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2jrjpthj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4vzyy5xv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY109

Abstract : Within the dynamic realm of virtual communities, Meta Land presents itself as a welcome deviation from the decentralised standard. It presents a centralised platform with an emphasis on user participation, creativity, and inclusion. In contrast to conventional metaverse platforms, ML priori- tises the development of significant relationships via its sub- community platform, serving a variety of demographics including independent contractors and students. Decentralised governance gives people the ability to control machine learning, making sure that it stays in line with the community’s overall goals.By means of its virtual economy and engagement mechanisms that provide incentives, ML facilitates equal participation and cultivates a lively community culture. By providing a dynamic and engaging experience for people globally, ML aims to change the virtual environment with a dedication to ongoing innovation and sustainability.

References :

1. Jones, A., and Brown, C. (2019). The role of community in virtual spaces. Journal of Virtual Communities Research, 12(3), 45-56.
2. Smith, J. (2020). Decentralized governance in virtual communities: A case study of Meta Land. Journal of Virtual Communities Research, 15(2), 112-125.
3. Brown, C. (2020). Sustainable monetization strategies for virtual com- munities. Journal of Virtual Communities Research, 18(4), 321-334.
4. Garcia, A., and Martinez, B. (2019). Localization efforts in virtual community platforms. International Journal of Virtual Community De- velopment, 6(2), 87-102.
5. Johnson, D., and Lee, S. (2020). Leveraging emerging technologies in virtual community platforms. Journal of Technology Integration in Virtual Communities, 25(3), 189-202.
6. Smith, J., Adams, R., and White, L. (2021). Expansion strategies for vir- tual community platforms. Journal of Virtual Community Development, 22(1), 45-58.