Authors : Maaz Bahauddin Naveed

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mw6dka3h

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4kjstnps

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun2040

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Research on composite materials has gradually replaced traditional materials and alloys in an effort to create effective and cost-effective solutions for a range of applications. Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) offer several benefits over traditional composites, including a lower thermal expansion coefficient, improved resistance to wear and abrasion, a higher strength-to-weight ratio, and reduced density. This review focuses on MMCs based on aluminium, magnesium, copper, titanium, and zinc as well as their alloys. It examines their physical and mechanical properties, manufacturing techniques (such as in-situ, liquid-phase, and solid-phase manufacture), and recent advancements. The properties of MMCs have been enhanced. As a result, they are suitable for critical applications in electronics, autos, and aerospace. Significant findings show how they can overcome the shortcomings of conventional materials by improving a range of mechanical properties. Their tensile characteristics, density, thermal expansion coefficient, elasticity modulus, hardness and fracture resistance, fatigue resistance, creep stiffness, and electrical conductivity can all be enhanc ed by using reinforcing techniques. The text also emphasises how important it is to select the right production processes to obtain the necessary characteristics while lowering costs and defects. This evaluation is a comprehensive resource for researchers and business professionals. It highlights current advancements, challenges, and the vast potential of MMCs as future resources.

Keywords : Metal Matrix Composites, Conventional Materials, Fabrication Techniques, Reinforcement.

References :

1. Ashby MF. Materials selection in mechanical design. 3rd ed. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-663-7.00001-1.
2. Legzdins C, Samarasekera I, Meech J. MMCX—an expert system for metal matrix composite selection and design. Can Metallurg Q. 1997;36:177–202.
3. Knowles AJ, Jiang X, Galano M, Audebert F. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 6061 Al alloy-based composites with SiC nanoparticles. J Alloy Compd. 2014;615:S401–5.
4. Chawla N, Shen YL. Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater. 2001;3:357–70.
5. Llorca J. Fatigue of particle-and whisker-reinforced metal-matrix composites. Prog Mater Sci. 2002;47:283–353.
6. Harichandran R, Selvakumar N. Effect of nano/micro B4C particles on the mechanical properties of aluminium metal matrix composites fabricated by ultrasonic cavitation-assisted solidification process. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2016;16:147–58.
7. Lukkassen D, Meidell A. Advanced materials and structures and their fabrication processes. Narrik University College; 2007.
8. Adebisi AA, Maleque MA, Rahman MM. Metal matrix composite brake rotors: historical development and product life cycle analysis. Int J Autom Mech Eng. 2011;4:471–80. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.4.2011.8.0038.
9. Rawal SP. Metal-matrix composites for space applications. JOM. 2001;53(4):14–7.
10. Shelley JS, LeClaire R, Nichols J. Metal-matrix composites for liquid rocket engines. JOM. 2001;53(4):18–21.
11. Fatchurrohman N, Sulaiman S, Sapuan SM, Ariffin MKA, Baharuddin BTHT. ‘Generic framework for conceptual design using concur-rent engineering strategy. A case study: advanced material application product development of metal matrix composite component. Advanced materials research, vol. 626. Trans Tech Publications Ltd.; 2013. p. 99–108.
12. Feest EA. Metal matrix composites for industrial application. Mater Des. 1986;7(2):58–64.
13. Metal Matrix Composites (MMC) market for ground transportation, electronics/thermal management, aerospace and other end-users—global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends and forecast, 2013–2019 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140605070839-17377 4513-metal-matrix-composites-market-review/.
14. Kainer KU. Basics of metal matrix composites. Combination Mater Light Metal Matrix Compos. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/35276 08117.ch1.
15. Pramanik S, Cherusseri J, Baban NS, et al. Metal matrix composites: theory, techniques, and applications. In: Kar K, editor. Composite Materials. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49514-8_11.
16. Surappa MK. Microstructure evolution during solidification of DRMMCs (discontinuously reinforced metal matrix composites): state of art. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;63:325–33.
17. Nair S, Kim H. Modification of the shear lag analysis for determination of elastic modulus of short-fiber (or whisker) reinforced metal matrix composites. J Appl Mech. 1992;59:S176–82.
18. Fukuda H, Chou TW. An advanced shear-lag model applicable to discontinuous fiber composites. J Compos Mater. 1981;15(1):79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838101500107.
19. Panwar N, Chauhan A. Fabrication methods of particulate reinforced Aluminium metal matrix composite-a review. Mater Today: Proc. 2018;5(2):5933–9.
20. Goh CS, Wei J, Lee LC, Gupta M. Ductility improvement and fatigue studies in Mg-CNT nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:1432–9.
21. Li X, Yang Y, Cheng X. Ultrasonic-assisted fabrication of metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci. 2004;39:3211–2.
22. Hashim J, Looney L, Hashmi MSJ. The wettability of SiC particles by molten aluminium alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;119:324–8.
23. Zhang Z, Chen DL. Contribution of orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng 2008;483–484:148–52.
24. Tavoosi M, Karimzadeh F, Enayati MH. Fabrication of Al–Zn/a-Al2O3 nanocomposite by mechanical alloying. Mater Lett. 2008;62:282–5.
25. Chawla KK. Metal matrix composites. Springer; 2006.
26. Clyne TW, Withers PJ. An introduction to metal matrix composites. Cambridge University Press; 1995.
27. Surappa MK. Aluminum matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana. 2003;28(1–2):319–34.
28. Lloyd DJ. Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites. Int Mater Rev. 1994;39(1):1–23.
29. Li XC, Stampfl J, Prinz FB. Mechanical and thermal expansion behavior of laser deposited metal matrix composites of Invar and TiC. Mater Sci Eng A Struct. 2000;282:86–90.
30. Dieter GE, Bacon D. Mechanical metallurgy SI metric edition. J Franklin Inst. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(62)91145-6.
31. Elomari S, et al. Thermal expansion behavior of particulate metal-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1998;58(3–4):369–76. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(97)00124-3.
32. Clyne TW. A simple development of the shear lag theory appropriate for composites with a relatively small modulus mismatch. Mater Sci Eng, A. 1989;122(2):183–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(89)90629-1.
33. Chawla KK, Chawla N. Metal-matrix composites. 1. Material science and technology. 2004. p. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-050073-7.50011-7.
34. Callister W, Rethwisch D. Materials science and engineering: an introduction. Mater Sci Eng. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87) 90343.
35. McLelland A, Atkinson H, Anderson P. Thixoforming of a novel layered metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Technol Ser. 1999;15:939–45.
36. Qian L, Kobayashi T, Toda H, Goda T, Wang Z-g. Fracture toughness of a 6061Al matrix composite reinforced with fine SiC particles. Mater Trans. 2002;43:2838–42.
37. ASTM E399-60. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. West Conshohocken: Annual Book of Standards; 1997. (ASTM International).
38. Chawla KK. Ceramic matrix composites. London: Chapman and hall; 1993.
39. Ochiai S. Mechanical properties of metallic composites. CRC Press; 1993.
40. Das S. The influence of matrix microstructure and particle reinforcement on the two-body abrasive wear of an Al-Si alloy. J Mater Sci Lett. 1997;16(21):1757–60. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018579510067.
41. Huei-Long L, Wun-Hwa L, Chan SL-I. Abrasive wear of powder metallurgy Al alloy 6061-SiC particle composites. Wear. 1992;159(2):223–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(92)90305-r.
42. Ma Z, Liang Y, Lu Y, Bi J. Effect of matrix strengthening on sliding wear properties of SiCp/2024Al composites. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 1998;8(4):556–61.
43. Daoud A, El-Khair MA, Abdel-Azim A. Effect of Al2O3 particles on the microstructure and sliding wear of 7075 Al alloy manufactured by squeeze casting method. J Mater Eng Perform. 2004;13(2):135–43. https://doi.org/10.1361/10599490418325.
44. Michael RHB, Ramabalan S, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ. Effect of TiB2 content and temperature on sliding wear behavior of AA7075/TiB2 in situ aluminum cast composites. Arch Civil Mech Eng. 2014;14(1):72–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.05.005.
45. Raturi A, Mer K, Kumar PP. Synthesis and characterization of mechanical, tribological and micro structural behaviour of Al 7075 matrix reinforced with nano Al2O3 particles. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4(2):2645–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.139.
46. Rana H, Badheka V, Kumar A. Fabrication of Al7075/B4C surface composite by novel friction stir processing (FSP) and investigation on wear properties. Procedia Technol. 2016;23:519–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.058.
47. Yue TM, Yan LJ, Chan CP. Stress corrosion cracking behavior of Nd:YAG laser-treated aluminum alloy 7075. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252(14):5026–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.052.
48. Varma S, Vasquez G. Corrosive wear behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy and its composite containing Al2O3 particles. J Mater Eng Perform. 2003;12(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1361/105994903770343547.
49. Zhou H, Li X, Ma J, Dong C, Huang Y. Dependence of the corrosion behavior of aluminum alloy 7075 on the thin electrolyte layers. Mater Sci Eng, B. 2009;162:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2009.01.003.
50. Karunanithi R, Bera S, Ghosh K. Electrochemical behaviour of TiO2 reinforced Al 7075 composite. Mater Sci Eng, B. 2014;190:133–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2014.06.013.
51. Nagaswarupa H, Bheemanna H, Banuprakash G. Electrochemical studies of Al 7075/zircon metal matrix composites in natural sea water. J Ultra Chem. 2012;8:319–28.
52. Huang Y-S, Shih T-S, Chou J-H. Electrochemical behavior of anodized AA7075-T73 alloys as affected by the matrix structure. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;283:249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.094.
53. Weber L, Dorn J, Mortensen A. On the electrical conductivity of metal matrix composites containing high volume fractions of non-conducting inclusions. Acta Mater. 2003;51:3199–211.
54. Ozben T, Kilickap E, Çakır O. Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al-MMC. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;198(1–3):220–5.
55. Abouelmagd G. Hot deformation and wear resistance of P/M aluminium metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;155–156:1395–401.
56. Shen Q, Chuandong Wu, Luo G, Fang P, Li C, Wang Y, Zhang L. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7075/B4C composites fabricated by plasma activated sintering. J Alloys Compd. 2014;588:265–70.
57. Mahesh VP, Nair PS, Rajan TPD, Pai BC, Hubli RC. Processing of surface-treated boron carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composites by liquid–metal stir-casting technique. J Compos Mater. 2011;45(23):2371–8.