Authors :
Onyenze Kevin Ikeokwu; Godson Chioma Abugwu; Emmanuel Chigozie Umeh; Nwachukwu Adaku Chinyere
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4nt6p39k
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/yrr73hmv
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov078
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The study focuses on determining the prediction performance of autoregressive integrated moving average
(ARIMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and long short-term memory (LSTM)
models of Nigerian crude oil prices. The comparisons among traditional linear models, volatility-based models, and deep
learning approaches were done using monthly data from January 1946 to June 2025. Based on the outcomes, the ARIMA
(1,1,0) model produces a fairly good linear fit for the data. However, it has relatively high prediction errors, with an MSE
equal to 590.87, RMSE equal to 24.31 and MAPE equal to 28.27%. The GARCH (1,1) models exhibit successful volatility
clustering capturing, with the t-distribution variant outperforming the normal specification while still yielding higher
prediction error than deep learning.
The MSE for the LSTM model was 112.74 with a RMSE of 10.62 and a MAPE of 15.06% which closely followed the
actual price movement. The LSTM model was the best model overall in predicting the Nigerian crude oil prices. This finding
was evidence that markets characterised by volatility and nonlinear dynamics are best modeled using deep learning
nonlinear approaches rather than the traditional econometric models.
Keywords :
Crude Oil Price Prediction; ARIMA; GARCH; LSTM; Deep Learning; Nigeria.
References :
- Adeniyi, O., Oyinlola, A., & Omisakin, O. (2011). Oil price shocks and economic growth in Nigeria: Are thresholds important? OPEC Energy Review, 35(4), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00192.x
- Adhikari, R., & Agrawal, R. K. (2013). An introductory study on time series modeling and forecasting (CoRR arXiv:1302.6613). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6613
- Ahmed, S., Hassan, S.-U., Aljohani, N. R., & Nawaz, R. (2020). FLF-LSTM: A novel prediction system using Forex Loss Function. Applied Soft Computing, 97, 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106780
- Alquist, R., & Kilian, L. (2010). What do we learn from the price of crude oil futures? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(4), 539–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1159
- Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016). Forty years of oil price fluctuations: Why the price of oil may still surprise us. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.139
- Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
- Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day.
- Central Bank of Nigeria. (2025). Crude oil price (Bonny Light) — US$/Barrel (Daily). Retrieved [insert access date], from https://www.cbn.gov.ng/rates/crudeoil.html
- Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
- Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1008. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
- Ewing, B. T., & Malik, F. (2013). Volatility transmission between gold and oil futures under structural breaks. International Review of Economics & Finance, 25, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.06.008
- Fattouh, B. (2010). The dynamics of crude oil price differentials. Energy Economics, 32(2), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.016
- Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. https://www.deeplearningbook.org
- Hamilton, J. D. (2009). Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2009(1), 215–283. https://www.nber.org/papers/w15002
- Haykin, S. (2008). Neural networks and learning machines (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Hewamalage, H., Bergmeir, C., & Bandara, K. (2021). Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.05.011
- Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
- Kilian, L., & Zhou, X. (2020). Oil prices, gasoline prices and inflation expectations: A new model and new facts (CFS Working Paper No. 645). Center for Financial Studies. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3731014
- Li, R., Zhang, Z., Wang, T., & Liu, H. (2021). A novel multiscale forecasting model for crude oil price. Energy Reports, 7, 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.054
- Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2007). Modelling oil price volatility. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6549–6553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.018
- Nwaigwe, C. C., Bartholomew, D. C., Umeh, E. C., Nwafor, G. O., Adamu, I., & Oguguo, S. C. (2023). Modeling of the Microsoft stock prices using machine learning and classical models: Identification of optimal model for application. International Journal of Formal Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 3(6), 34–52.* https://ijfscfrtjournal.isrra.org/index.php/Formal_Sciences_Journal/article/view/905/120
- Prabhakaran, S. (2021). ARIMA model — Complete guide to time series forecasting in Python. Machine Learning Plus. https://www.machinelearningplus.com/time-series/arima-model-time-series-forecasting-python/
- Salisu, A. A., & Fasanya, I. O. (2013). Modelling oil price volatility with structural breaks. Energy Policy, 52, 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.003
- Wang, J., Athanasopoulos, G., Hyndman, R. J., & Wang, S. (2018). Crude oil price forecasting based on internet concern using an extreme learning machine. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(4), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.03.009
- Yu, L., Wang, Z., & Tang, L. (2015). A decomposition–ensemble model with data-characteristic-driven reconstruction for crude oil price forecasting. Applied Energy, 156, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.025
- Zhang, Y., Ma, F., & Wang, Y. (2019). Forecasting crude oil prices with a large set of predictors: Can LASSO select powerful predictors? Journal of Empirical Finance, 54, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.08.007
The study focuses on determining the prediction performance of autoregressive integrated moving average
(ARIMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and long short-term memory (LSTM)
models of Nigerian crude oil prices. The comparisons among traditional linear models, volatility-based models, and deep
learning approaches were done using monthly data from January 1946 to June 2025. Based on the outcomes, the ARIMA
(1,1,0) model produces a fairly good linear fit for the data. However, it has relatively high prediction errors, with an MSE
equal to 590.87, RMSE equal to 24.31 and MAPE equal to 28.27%. The GARCH (1,1) models exhibit successful volatility
clustering capturing, with the t-distribution variant outperforming the normal specification while still yielding higher
prediction error than deep learning.
The MSE for the LSTM model was 112.74 with a RMSE of 10.62 and a MAPE of 15.06% which closely followed the
actual price movement. The LSTM model was the best model overall in predicting the Nigerian crude oil prices. This finding
was evidence that markets characterised by volatility and nonlinear dynamics are best modeled using deep learning
nonlinear approaches rather than the traditional econometric models.
Keywords :
Crude Oil Price Prediction; ARIMA; GARCH; LSTM; Deep Learning; Nigeria.