⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Modified Snappe-II as a Predictor of Severity of Illness Among Human Milk-Fed and Formula-Fed Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis


Authors : Salomi S.; Dr. Komala H. K.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3765yrab

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ycx8nb4v

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1766

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: Low birth weight (LBW) infants are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, including severe morbidity and mortality during the neonatal period. The Modified Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPEII) is widely used to assess illness severity in neonatal intensive care units; however, evidence regarding its predictive performance, particularly in relation to feeding practices, remains fragmented.  Objective: To systematically review the available evidence on the predictive value of the Modified SNAPPE-II score for assessing severity of illness, morbidity, and mortality among human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants.  Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2001 and March 2025. Studies evaluating the predictive performance of the Modified SNAPPE-II score in low birth weight infants were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Owing to heterogeneity in study design, populations, and reported outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirteen studies involving diverse neonatal populations met the eligibility criteria. Across the included studies, higher Modified SNAPPE-II scores consistently demonstrated a strong association with neonatal mortality and greater illness severity. Several studies also reported good discriminatory ability for predicting major neonatal complications, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit stay. Although human milk feeding is recognized for improving neonatal outcomes, none of the included studies directly compared the predictive performance of the Modified SNAPPE-II score between human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants. Consequently, evidence regarding the influence of feeding modality on illness severity prediction remains limited.  Conclusion: The available evidence indicates that the Modified SNAPPE-II score is a reliable tool for early assessment of illness severity and prediction of mortality among low birth weight infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether its predictive performance differs according to feeding modality. Well- designed prospective studies comparing human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants are needed to address this important knowledge gap and to strengthen the clinical application of the Modified SNAPPE-II score.

Keywords : Modified SNAPPE-II; Low Birth Weight; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; Illness Severity; Neonatal Mortality; Neonatal Morbidity; Human Milk; Formula Feeding; Systematic Review; Narrative Synthesis.

References :

  1. World Health Organization. Low birth weight: policy brief. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
  2. UNICEF, WHO. Low Birthweight Estimates: Levels and Trends 2000–2020. New York: UNICEF; 2023.
  3. Blencowe H, Krasevec J, de Onis M, et al. National, regional and worldwide estimates of low birthweight. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e849-e860.
  4. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, et al. Every Newborn: progress and priorities. Lancet. 2014;384:189-205.
  5. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF. Low birth weight in developed and developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:584S-590S.
  6. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, et al. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP). Pediatrics. 1993;91:617-623.
  7. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II. Pediatrics. 2001;108:92-100.
  8. Dorling JS, Field DJ, Manktelow B. Neonatal disease severity scoring systems. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F11-F16.
  9. Richardson DK, et al. Pediatrics. 2001;108:92-100.
  10. Escobar GJ, Fischer A, Li DK, et al. Neonatal severity assessment. Pediatrics. 1995;96:379-383.
  11. Zupancic JA. Neonatal intensive care outcome prediction. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:411-429.
  12. Muktan D, Singh RR, Bhatta NK, Shah GS. Predictive value of SNAPPE-II. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:279.
  13. Samanta M, Mondal R, Ray S, et al. SNAPPE-II for mortality prediction. J Clin Neonatol. 2020;9:34-40.
  14. Madhunandan K, Badakali AV. Utility of SNAPPE-II. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2022;9:1200-1205.
  15. Siddappa AM, Quiggle GM, Lock E, Rao RB. SNAPPE-II and IVH prediction. J Perinatol. 2021;41:1204-1210.
  16. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century. Lancet. 2016;387:475-490.
  17. Ballard O, Morrow AL. Human milk composition. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60:49-74.
  18. Patel AL, Johnson TJ, Robin B, et al. Human milk and neonatal outcomes. J Pediatr. 2017;180:15-21.
  19. Quigley M, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD002971.
  20. Underwood MA. Human milk for preterm infants. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60:189-207.
  21. Meier PP, Patel AL, Esquerra-Zwiers A. Human milk feeding. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:1-22.
  22. Abrams SA, Schanler RJ. Enteral nutrition for preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2021;147:e2021051485.
  23. Özcan B, Kavurt AS, Aydemir Ö, et al. SNAPPE-II and neonatal morbidity. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2017;52:205-212.
  24. Dammann O, Shah B, Naples M, et al. SNAP-II in extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e982-e989.
  25. Lim L, Rozycki HJ. SNAPPE-II and NICU outcomes. J Perinatol. 2008;28:38-43.
  26. Li A, Mullin S, Elkin PL. Machine learning versus SNAPPE-II. Pediatr Res. 2024;95:1250-1258.
  27. Tang L, Wu W, Huang W, Bi G. Prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1352456.
  28. Amin Ali, et al. SNAPPE-II in neonatal mortality. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37:1512-1518.
  29. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
  30. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.

Background: Low birth weight (LBW) infants are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, including severe morbidity and mortality during the neonatal period. The Modified Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPEII) is widely used to assess illness severity in neonatal intensive care units; however, evidence regarding its predictive performance, particularly in relation to feeding practices, remains fragmented.  Objective: To systematically review the available evidence on the predictive value of the Modified SNAPPE-II score for assessing severity of illness, morbidity, and mortality among human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants.  Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2001 and March 2025. Studies evaluating the predictive performance of the Modified SNAPPE-II score in low birth weight infants were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Owing to heterogeneity in study design, populations, and reported outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirteen studies involving diverse neonatal populations met the eligibility criteria. Across the included studies, higher Modified SNAPPE-II scores consistently demonstrated a strong association with neonatal mortality and greater illness severity. Several studies also reported good discriminatory ability for predicting major neonatal complications, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit stay. Although human milk feeding is recognized for improving neonatal outcomes, none of the included studies directly compared the predictive performance of the Modified SNAPPE-II score between human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants. Consequently, evidence regarding the influence of feeding modality on illness severity prediction remains limited.  Conclusion: The available evidence indicates that the Modified SNAPPE-II score is a reliable tool for early assessment of illness severity and prediction of mortality among low birth weight infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether its predictive performance differs according to feeding modality. Well- designed prospective studies comparing human milk-fed and formula-fed low birth weight infants are needed to address this important knowledge gap and to strengthen the clinical application of the Modified SNAPPE-II score.

Keywords : Modified SNAPPE-II; Low Birth Weight; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; Illness Severity; Neonatal Mortality; Neonatal Morbidity; Human Milk; Formula Feeding; Systematic Review; Narrative Synthesis.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe