Momentum vs. Value Investing: A Comparative Analysis of the S&P 500 and Nifty 50


Authors : Lakshya Jain

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/m94ujrvw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may210

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study looks at how momentum and value investing strategies performed in the U.S. and Indian stock markets from 2018 to 2025. It applies these strategies to stocks in the S&P 500 and Nifty 50 indices. The results show that both strategies did better than the S&P 500, but in the Nifty 50, only value investing beat the benchmark, while momentum investing performed worse. Momentum investing worked well in the U.S. market by taking advantage of rising trends but struggled during market drops. In India, value investing performed better, as it benefited from the market’s inefficiencies. These results highlight how market structure influences investment strategy effectiveness. Future research could explore macroeconomic impacts, sector-specific trends, and hybrid approaches that combine momentum and value principles.

References :

  1. Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and momentum everywhere. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985.
  2. Baker, M., Bradley, B., & Wurgler, J. (2011). Benchmarks as limits to arbitrage: Understanding the low-volatility anomaly. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(1), 40-54.
  3. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
  4. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
  5. Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, F. (2017). The characteristics that provide independent information about average U.S. monthly stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), 2979-3006.
  6. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
  7. Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1999). A non-random walk down Wall Street. Princeton University Press.

This study looks at how momentum and value investing strategies performed in the U.S. and Indian stock markets from 2018 to 2025. It applies these strategies to stocks in the S&P 500 and Nifty 50 indices. The results show that both strategies did better than the S&P 500, but in the Nifty 50, only value investing beat the benchmark, while momentum investing performed worse. Momentum investing worked well in the U.S. market by taking advantage of rising trends but struggled during market drops. In India, value investing performed better, as it benefited from the market’s inefficiencies. These results highlight how market structure influences investment strategy effectiveness. Future research could explore macroeconomic impacts, sector-specific trends, and hybrid approaches that combine momentum and value principles.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe