Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Retention Among English Major Students: A Mixed Method Study


Authors : Karl Patrick Babatuan; Jayson F. Permangil

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5n8j4jde

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3wspcyzb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1272

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The study aimed to examine the morphological awareness and vocabulary retention of English major students enrolled in the teacher education program at Kapalong College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology. The researcher employed a mixed-method design utilizing the convergent parallel methodology. Participants consisted of English major students from all academic years at the college, with 185 individuals randomly chosen for the quantitative phase and about 14 students purposively selected for the qualitative phase: 7 for in-depth interviews and 7 for focused group discussions. The results suggested that both morphological awareness and vocabulary retention were elevated; the data were dismissed, revealing a considerable link between the two. Moreover, the results from both the quantitative and qualitative phases generally aligned; nevertheless, one indicator diverged. The study established that morphological awareness considerably enhances vocabulary retention among English major students, promoting effective and efficient language use in real-world scenarios. Language learners are advised to prioritize memory strategies, such as mnemonic devices and spaced repetition approaches, to boost vocabulary and grammatical retention, despite the indicators' lowest mean based on the results. Furthermore, to enhance speaking proficiency, students ought to participate in practical language applications relevant to their contexts, facilitating the practice and development of fluency, which is crucial for effective communication in professional, social, and academic settings.

Keywords : Morphological Awareness, Vocabulary Retention, Mix Methods, English Major Students, Philippines.

References :

  1. Afri, D., & Putra, H. (2021). The effectiveness of teaching derivational morphemes in improving vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(2), 235–248.
  2. Ahmed, R., & Asraf, R. M. (2021). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Its impact on word retention and reading comprehension. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(4), 88–101.
  3. Akarslan, O., & Bedir, H. (2019). Long-term retention of English vocabulary through teaching word roots. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 119–134.
  4. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
  5. Aswadi, I. (2024). Contextual vocabulary learning in ESL classrooms: Optimizing retention through relevance. Asian EFL Journal, 26(2), 56–73.
  6. Aton, A., Cruz, M., & Lopez, J. (2024). Socioeconomic factors and vocabulary proficiency among English majors. Philippine Journal of Language and Education, 15(1), 45–63.
  7. Bae, J., & Bachman, L. (2019). The relationship between lexical knowledge and academic reading performance. Language Testing, 36(2), 213–234.
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
  9. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 169–190.
  10. Chen, X., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Multimedia-assisted vocabulary learning: Effects on retention and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1235–1255.
  11. Chung, L., & Long, H. (2024). Cultural exposure and contextual understanding in English language acquisition. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 12(1), 99–115.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  13. Demir, S., & Pismek, N. (2018). A convergent parallel mixed-methods study of preservice teachers’ digital literacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 176–200.
  14. Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235.
  15. Endres, T., Renkl, A., & Holzberger, D. (2021). Retrieval practice and spacing in vocabulary learning: A classroom study. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 877–898.
  16. Far Eastern University. (2023). Game-based learning and vocabulary retention among junior high school students in Northern Cagayan. FEU Research Journal, 9(1), 45–60.
  17. Feng, J., Zhao, H., & Liu, Q. (2023). The use of mind mapping in vocabulary learning: Effects on EFL students’ retention. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 345–368.
  18. Giazitzidou, E., Mouzaki, A., & Padeliadu, S. (2024). Morphological awareness as a predictor of vocabulary knowledge and reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 37(1), 101–120.
  19. Gonzalez, J., Tremblay, A., & Binder, K. (2023). Context and lexical ambiguity resolution in adult literacy learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(3), 721–742.
  20. Graham, S., Liu, X., & Bartlett, B. (2023). Vocabulary retention and oral proficiency in university learners. System, 115, 102015.
  21. Harding, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis from start to finish. Sage.
  22. Hu, X., & Luo, Y. (2024). Multisensory learning and vocabulary retention among Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 201–215.
  23. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
  24. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2017). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
  25. Karami, H., & Bowles, R. (2019). The role of vocabulary knowledge in second language listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 89–113.
  26. Keating, G. (2018). Task-induced involvement and vocabulary learning: Testing the Involvement Load Hypothesis. Language Learning, 68(2), 348–377.
  27. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2021). Lexical quality and reading comprehension among bilingual learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 901–918.
  28. Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, a1035.
  29. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
  30. Lee, J. (2022). Context-aware technologies in foreign language learning: A systematic review. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 22–45.
  31. Martínez, C., & Rodríguez, L. (2022). Vocabulary retention and academic writing proficiency in ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100866.
  32. Masrai, A., El-Dakhs, D., & Yahya, M. (2022). Vocabulary knowledge, self-perception, and academic achievement in EMI contexts. System, 108, 102843.
  33. Matwangsaeng, A., & Sukying, A. (2023). The impact of explicit morphological awareness instruction on EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Asian EFL Journal, 25(6), 155–175.
  34. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Mertler, C. A. (2019). Introduction to educational research (2nd ed.). Sage.
  36. Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 237–270.
  37. Nguyen, T., Williams, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Stratified random sampling in educational research: Benefits and applications. Educational Research Review, 30, 100333.
  38. Obenza, J., Sumayo, A., & Adriano, M. (2023). Contrastive analysis of Cebuano and English morphemes in pop songs. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 54(2), 88–102.
  39. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
  40. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
  41. Qin, W. (2023). Task involvement and vocabulary learning: Comparing the Involvement Load Hypothesis and Technical Feature Analysis. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 197–215.
  42. Rahmat, A., Yusuf, Y., & Kadir, N. (2022). The influence of knowledge types on language use in EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 85–97.
  43. Saksittanupab, K. (2024). Effects of spaced repetition on long-term vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Asia TEFL, 21(2), 444–461.
  44. Sato, T., Suzuki, T., & Takahashi, K. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning and vocabulary recall. ReCALL, 32(3), 301–319.
  45. Schnur, E., & Rubio, P. (2021). Lexical complexity and writing proficiency in Spanish Dual Language Immersion programs. Bilingual Research Journal, 44(3), 287–304.
  46. Setiawan, R., & Sulhan, M. (2020). Self-confidence, vocabulary mastery, and speaking ability in vocational high school students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Education, 11(2), 120–134.
  47. Shabaneh, Y., & Farrah, M. (2019). The effect of games on vocabulary retention. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 79–90.
  48. Stewart, J., Kim, H., & Park, J. (2024). The role of meaning recall in predicting reading proficiency. Reading and Writing, 37(2), 231–248.
  49. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
  50. Watanapokakul, S. (2012). The effect of learning prefixes and roots on deriving meanings of unfamiliar words. Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(9), 54–61.
  51. Wood, C., Spencer, T., & Williams, J. (2025). Computer-delivered morphology instruction and vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(1), 45–60.
  52. Xia, Q., Chen, X., & Sun, Y. (2022). Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in elementary school children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(1), 77–98.
  53. Xiao, Y. (2023). Schema theory in English vocabulary teaching: A study of senior high school learners. English Education Journal, 13(4), 111–125.
  54. Zaidi, A., Ahmad, N., & Rahman, S. (2020). Adaptive forgetting curves in spaced repetition systems for vocabulary learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 644–656.
  55. Zhang, L. (2023). Dimensionality of morphological knowledge and its effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition. System, 114, 102053.
  56. Zhang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Lexical knowledge and academic writing proficiency in ESL contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100872.
  57. Zhang, Y., Yang, L., & Li, H. (2020). Semantic similarity and ambiguity in incidental vocabulary learning. Applied Linguistics, 41(3), 411–436.
  58. Zrig, A. (2020). Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 40–52.

The study aimed to examine the morphological awareness and vocabulary retention of English major students enrolled in the teacher education program at Kapalong College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology. The researcher employed a mixed-method design utilizing the convergent parallel methodology. Participants consisted of English major students from all academic years at the college, with 185 individuals randomly chosen for the quantitative phase and about 14 students purposively selected for the qualitative phase: 7 for in-depth interviews and 7 for focused group discussions. The results suggested that both morphological awareness and vocabulary retention were elevated; the data were dismissed, revealing a considerable link between the two. Moreover, the results from both the quantitative and qualitative phases generally aligned; nevertheless, one indicator diverged. The study established that morphological awareness considerably enhances vocabulary retention among English major students, promoting effective and efficient language use in real-world scenarios. Language learners are advised to prioritize memory strategies, such as mnemonic devices and spaced repetition approaches, to boost vocabulary and grammatical retention, despite the indicators' lowest mean based on the results. Furthermore, to enhance speaking proficiency, students ought to participate in practical language applications relevant to their contexts, facilitating the practice and development of fluency, which is crucial for effective communication in professional, social, and academic settings.

Keywords : Morphological Awareness, Vocabulary Retention, Mix Methods, English Major Students, Philippines.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe