Authors : Darren S. Fisher

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/46u3p5yy

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/8ms5k3xk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14810105

Abstract : This study introduces the Regulatory Quadrant of Shielding and Innovativeness (RQSi), a conceptual framework by the author that untangles the complex relationship between government regulatory practices and innovation within developing economies. This article forms part of a broader investigation into regulatory quality and technological growth dynamics, where the researcher identifies “regulatory shielding,” a phenomenon where protective policy measures unintentionally hinder technological adoption and stifle innovation. Through comprehensive statistical analysis, the study uncovers critical insights into the roles of the Regulatory Quality Index (RQI), Human Development Index (HDI), and Global Innovation Index (GII), in fostering innovation. The findings reveal that supportive regulatory frameworks and targeted government interventions significantly enhance socio-economic readiness (SER), enabling the adoption of emerging technologies that drive competitive advantage and market evolution. This article advocates for reducing regulatory shielding and promoting collaboration among governments, industries, and academia to accelerate technological ambidexterity and economic transformation. By establishing the RQSi Framework, this research provides a robust foundation for future studies to refine policy designs that promote innovation and sustainable development. Therefore, offering actionable pathways to reshape regulatory environments and build innovation-led economies.

Keywords : Developing Countries, Digital Economy, Global Innovation Index (GII), Human Development Index (HDI),

References :

1. Amesho, K. T. T., Edoun, E. I., Naidoo, V., & Pooe, S. (2021). Managing competitive advantage through technology and innovation systems in the local government authorities. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), Article a1348. 
2. Banmairuroy, W., Kritjaroen, T., & Homsombat, W. (2021, March 12). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Thailand's new s-curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review.
3. Biber, E., Light, S. E., Ruhl, J. B., & Salzman, J. (2019). Regulating Business Innovation as Policy Disruption: From the Model T to Airbnb. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70(5), 4.
4. Blind, K. (2011, October 22). The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy, 41, 391-400.
5. Bubaker, S. (2020, September). Theories of development. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(1), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344135136.
6. Butenko, A., & Larouche, P. (2015, March 26). Regulation for Innovativness or Regulation of Innovation? TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2015-007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584863 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2584863.
7. Casanovas, P., Koker, L. D., Mendelson, D., & Watts, D. (2017, May). Regulation of Big Data: Perspectives on strategy, policy, lay and privacy. Health Technology, 7, 355-349.
8. Celtekligil, K., & Adiguzel, Z. (2019). Analysis of the effect of innovation strategy and technological turbulence on competitive capabilities and organizational innovativeness in technology firms. Pocedia Computer Science(158), 772-780.
9. Chang, A., Kuentz, J. F., Wiseman, B., Seong, J., Lan, J., Tan, C., . . . Tang, D. (2017, September). Taiwan's Digital Imperative: How a digital transformation can re-ignite economic growth. Retrieved February 2022, from Mckinsey China: http://mckinseychina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/McKinsey_Taiwans-Digital-Imperative-EN.pdf
10. Chen, C., Lin, Y. C., Chen, W. H., Chao, C. F., & Pandia, H. (2021, January). Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small business. Sustainability, 13(1028).
11. Ciobanu, O. G., & Neamtu, D. (2017, July). The impact and importance of new technologies in business development in the context of economic diversity. Sciendo, 11(1), 698-710.
12. Cooter, R. (2005). Innovation, Information and the Poverty of Nations. Florida State University Law Review, 33(2), https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol33/iss2/1.
13. Eggers, W. D., Manstof, J., Kishnani, P. K., & Barroca, J. (2021). Seven pivots for government's digital transformation. Deloitte Insights.
14. Erik, S. (2008). Entrepreneurship and innovation policy. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2008(006).
15. Francis, S. (2018). Evolution of technology in the digital arena: Theories, Firm-level strategies and state policies. Indian Institute of Foreign Trade. New Delhi: Centre for WTO Studies.
16. Grochova, L. I. (2014, November 6). Regulatory Quality and sustainable economic development. Act Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6), 1201-1308.
17. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019, May). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1347-1366.
18. Hanna, N. (2018). A role for the state in the digital age. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(5).
19. Heck, S., & Rogers, M. (2014). Resource revolution: How to capture the biggest business opportunity in a century. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
20. Hertina, D., Effendi, K. A., & Ichsani, S. (2021, March). Technological education and its influence on digital economic readiness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of International Geographic Education (RIGEO), 11(1), 699-711.
21. Hogan, M., & Gallaher, M. (2018). Quantitative Indicators for Country-level Innovation Ecosystems, RTIPress.https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.op.0051.1805. RTI Press Publication, No. OP-0051-1805, .
22. Kalthaus, M. (2020). Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30(ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-3038), 643-704.
23. Lerner, J. (2009, May 2). The empirical impact of intellectual property. American Economic Review, 99(2), 343-48.
24. Lev-Artez, Y., & Strandburg, K. J. (2020, June 24). Regulation and Innovation: Approaching market failure from both sides. Yale Journal on Regulation.
25. Liao, Y., Lores, E. R., Deschamps, F., Brezinski, F., & Venancio, A. (2017). The Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution; a cross country/comparison. SciELO, DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20180061(28).
26. Ma, L., Liu, Z., Huang, X., & Li, T. (2019). The impact of local government policy on innovation ecosystem in knowledge resource-scarce region: Case study of Changzhou, China. Science, Technology and Society, 24(1), 29-54.
27. Madsen, D. O. (2019, August 19). The Emergence and Rise of Industry 4.0 Viewed through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory. Administrative Sciences.
28. Makins, J. (2009). Technology readiness assessments. Acta Astronuatica, 65(9), 1216-1223.
29. Marshall, K. P., Piper, W. S., & Wymer, W. W. (2005). Government Policy and Program Impacts on Technology Development, Transfer and Commercialization. Binghamton, NY/USA: Best Business Books imprint of The Haworth Press, Inc.
30. Moore, G. A. (2001). Crossing the Chasm. Harper Business.
31. Moser, P. (2003, August). How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world fairs. National Bureau of Economic Research.
32. Moser, P. (2012). Innovation without patents: evidence from world fairs. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 43-74.
33. Mugwagwa, J., Edwards, D., & Haan, S. (2015). Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: the cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania. Health Research Policy and Systems(13:21), DOI 10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2.
34. Nyagadza, B., Pashapa, R., Chare, A., Mazuruse, G., & Hove, P. K. (2022, January 5). Digital technologies, Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) & Global Value Chains (GVCs) nexus with emerging economies’ future industrial innovation dynamics. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 2014654, DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2014654.
35. Obibuaka, L. O. (1983). Agriculture extension as a strategy for rural transformation. University of Nigeria, Nsku Press.
36. Oluwatobi, S., Oluribola, I. O., Alege, P. O., & Uchenna, E. (2014, January). Innovation in Africa: Why institutions Matter. SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI: 10.2139/ssn.2460959.
37. Rasiah, R. (2019, January). How much of Raymond Vernon's product cycle thesis is still relevant today: evidence from the integrated circuits industry. International Journal Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 11(1), 56-57.
38. Reuschke, D., & Mason, C. (2020, February). The engagement of home-based business in the digital economy. Futures, 135.
39. Reyes, G. E. (2001, February). Four main theories of development: Modernization, Dependency, World-System, and Globalization. Revista Critica de Cienncias Sociales y Juridicas, 4.
40. Robleck, V., Mesko, M., & Alojz, K. (2016). A Complex View of Industry 4.0. Sage Open, 1-11.
41. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition. Free Press.
42. Ross, P., & Maynard, K. (2021, January 20). Towards a 4th industrial revolution. Intelligent Building International, 13(No. 3), 159-161.
43. Taylor, M. R., Rubin, E. S., & Hounshell, D. A. (2005, April). Regulation as the Mother of Innovation: The Case of SO2 Control. Law and Policy, 27(2).
44. Tessey, G. (2020). Technology Life Cycles. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship.
45. The Inter-Academy Partnership (IAP). (2007, October). The role of Government and the contribution of science and technology. Retrieved February 2022, from The Interacademy: https://www.interacademies.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/The%20Role%20of%20Government%20and%20the%20Contribution%20of%20Science%20and%20Technology.pdf
46. The World Bank. (2022). TCdata360. Retrieved January 2022, from The World Bank: https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/51ada6ba?country=BRA&indicator=40283&viz=line_chart&years=2013,2020
47. Tulchynska, S., Vovk, O., Popelo, O., Saloid, S., & Kostinunik, O. (2021, June 21). Innovation and investment strategies to intensify the potential modernization and to increase the competitiveness of microeconomic systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6, 161-168.
48. United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Human Development Reports. Retrieved January 2021, from United Nations Development Programme: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
49. Veldhoven, Z. V., & Vanthieen, J. (2021, March 10). Digital transformation is an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Springer Link.
50. Vukoszavlyez, S. (2019). The connection between Global Innovation Index and Economic Well-Being Indexes. APSTRACT, 13(3-4), DOI: 10.19041/APSTRACT/2019/3-4/11.
51. Wahyuningtyas, R., Disastra, G., & Rismayani, R. (2022, February 1). Toward cooperative competitiveness for community development in Economic Society 5.0. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, ISSN: 1750-6204.
52. Wang, S., Zhao, S., Shao, D., & Liu, H. (2020, September 18). Impact of government subsidies on manufacturing innovation in China: the moderating role of political connections and investor attention. Sustainability(12).
53. Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davis, P. (2019). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management, 24(1), 62-84.
54. Wilburn, K. M., & Wilburn, H. R. (2018). The impact of technology on business and society. Global Journal of Business Research, 12(1), 23-29.
55. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4571
56. World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). World Trade Report 2020. Retrieved February 2022, from The World Trade Organization: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wtr20_e/wtr20_e.pdf
57. Zervoudi, E. K. (2020). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities, Challenges, and Proposed Policies. Intech Open.
58. Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Xiaoyu, W., & Yao, Y. (2021, September 21). Study on the effect of the digital economy on high-quality economic development in China, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257365. Plos One, 16(9).