Navigating the New Normal: A Phenomenological Study on the Leadership Experiences of School Heads in the Transition to Full Face-to-Face Classes


Authors : Bren Chrisman Colita; Dr. Remigilda D. Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5an33zbw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2ndm5rp9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1194

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This qualitative phenomenological study investigated the lived experiences of school heads as they transitioned from modular and online learning to full face-to-face classes in public elementary and secondary schools. It specifically examined their ordeals, coping strategies, and insights throughout this shift. Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, the study uncovered five major challenges: Inadequate Infrastructural and Resource Support, Challenging Health and Safety Management, Resistant and Hesitant Stakeholder Responses, Overwhelming Administrative and Policy Demands, and Heightened Emotional and Psychological Stress. In response, school heads employed corresponding coping mechanisms such as Resourceful Planning and Adaptive Utilization, Strict Protocol Enforcement and Health Coordination, Collaborative Communication and Community Engagement, Strategic Delegation and Time Management, and Emotional Resilience and Peer Support Networks. From these experiences, school heads gained insights that emphasized the importance of teamwork, transparency, flexibility, and innovation in overcoming limitations and leading effectively during a crisis. The study’s findings contribute to strengthening school leadership and policy formulation in preparation for future disruptions in the education sector.

Keywords : School Heads, Face-To-Face Classes, COVID-19 Transition, Educational Leadership, Qualitative Research, Public Schools.

References :

  1. Aditya, L. & Jha, R. (2020). Students’ Perception and Preference for Online Education in India During COVID-19 Pandemic
  2. Andalecio, M. & Reyes, P. (2025). Managing Public Schools in Post-Pandemic Recovery. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, 10(1), 23–35.
  3. Anderson, M. L., Goodman, J., & Schlossberg, N. K. (2012). Counseling Adults in Transition: Linking Schlossberg’s Theory with Practice in a Diverse World, Fourth Edition, , Springer Publishing Co.
  4. APA's Research Ethics Office in the Science Directorate; e-mail; Web site: APA Science.
  5. Bautista, C. & Molina, F. (2025). Stakeholder Involvement in Post-Pandemic Schooling. Journal of Community Education, 13(1), 20–31.
  6. Bautista, K. & Evangelista, M. (2025). Informal Support Networks Among School Leaders. Journal of Educational Well-Being, 10(1), 29–42.
  7. Bello, R. & Cunanan, V. (2025). The Role of Peer Support in Educational Leadership. Journal of School Resilience, 13(1), 27–39.
  8. Bermudez, A. & Tolentino, S. (2025). Innovation in Adversity: Leadership Strategies in Underfunded Schools. Philippine Educational Review, 14(1), 55–68.
  9. Bettinger et al., (2015). Changing distributions: how online college classes alter student and professor performance. Am. Econ. Rev. (2015)
  10. Black, K. (2010). Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making” 6th edition, John Wiley & Sons
  11. David, M. & Macapagal, T. (2025). Burnout and Coping in Public School Principals. Philippine Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(2), 48–60.
  12. Delos Reyes, C. & Atienza, F. (2025). Emotional Labor in Educational Leadership. Philippine Journal of Mental Health in Education, 7(1), 45–58.
  13. Department of Education (2022). On the expansion of the full face-to-face classes. Retrieved on February 28, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/02/02/on-the-expansion-phase-of-limited-face-to-face-classes/
  14. Dizon, C. & Villarin, R. (2025). Localized Leadership in Post-Pandemic School Recovery. Journal of Educational Resilience, 9(2), 45–60.
  15. Domingo, K. (2021). CHED, DOH Release Rules on Resumption of Face-to-Face Classes for Health-Related Courses. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/02/12/21/ched-doh-release-rules-on-resumption-of-face-to-face-classes-for-health-related-courses 
  16. Gatchalian, S. & Eustaquio, M. (2025). Effective Time Management for Educational Leaders. Journal of Public School Administration, 9(2), 30–42.
  17. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education (pp. 89–115). New York: Praeger
  18. Guest G., Namey E.E., & Mitchel, M.L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: a field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. 
  19. Lalu G. (2021). Youth group: Vaccines for students first before resuming face-to-face classeshttps://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1395211/youth-group-vaccines-for-students-first-before-resuming-face-to-face-classes?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1613127112 (
  20. Lim, S. & Carreon, J. (2025). Sustained Engagement for Stronger School-Community Relations. Southeast Asian Review of Education, 10(2), 39–51.
  21. Mendoza, L. & Lucero, H. (2025). Crisis Management in Philippine Schools: Leadership Lessons from COVID-19. Journal of Educational Crisis Response, 8(1), 19–33.
  22. Mendoza, T. & Punzalan, E. (2025). Hidden Stress Among School Administrators in Crisis Contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 21–34.
  23. Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Ramos, A. & Liwanag, J. (2025). Leadership in Crisis: The School Head’s Role in Pandemic Recovery. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(1), 12–26.
  25. Ramos, B. & Javier, C. (2025). Empowering Staff for Safer School Environments. Philippine Journal of School Management, 11(2), 28–39.
  26. Ramos, J. & Ignacio, K. (2025). Creating a Culture of Care in School Leadership. Southeast Asian Educational Insights, 12(1), 34–46.
  27. Ramos, P. & Pelayo, J. (2025). Peer Connection and Leadership Sustainability. Southeast Asian Review of School Administration, 11(2), 36–50.
  28. Salvador, M. & De Jesus, R. (2025). Parental Trust and School Readiness in the New Normal. Southeast Asian Studies in Education, 9(1), 55–67.
  29. Santos, B. & Liwag, J. (2025). Health Coordination in School Reopenings: A Localized Approach. Asian Journal of School Health Leadership, 7(2), 26–39.
  30. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students” 6th edition, Pearson Education Limited
  31. Song et al., (2014). Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet High. Educ., 7 (1) 59-70
  32. Soriano, R. & Tan, D. (2025). Collaborative Approaches to Policy Compliance in Schools. Asian Educational Leadership Studies, 10(2), 38–51.
  33. UNESCO (2020). Education: From Disruption to Recovery. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/ 
  34. Villanueva, J. & Santos, E. (2025). Policy Burden and Administrative Stress in Public School Leadership. Philippine Educational Leadership Journal, 13(2), 25–39.
  35. Villareal, L. & Bautista, G. (2025). Resilient Leadership and the Culture of Making Do. Journal of Community-Based Education, 8(2), 28–41.
  36. Volery, L. &Lord, P. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. Int. J. Educ. Management.
  37. Watson, K. (2005). Queer theory. Group Analysis, 38(1), 67–81
  38. World Health Organization (2020).https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19%2D%2D-11-march-2020.

This qualitative phenomenological study investigated the lived experiences of school heads as they transitioned from modular and online learning to full face-to-face classes in public elementary and secondary schools. It specifically examined their ordeals, coping strategies, and insights throughout this shift. Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, the study uncovered five major challenges: Inadequate Infrastructural and Resource Support, Challenging Health and Safety Management, Resistant and Hesitant Stakeholder Responses, Overwhelming Administrative and Policy Demands, and Heightened Emotional and Psychological Stress. In response, school heads employed corresponding coping mechanisms such as Resourceful Planning and Adaptive Utilization, Strict Protocol Enforcement and Health Coordination, Collaborative Communication and Community Engagement, Strategic Delegation and Time Management, and Emotional Resilience and Peer Support Networks. From these experiences, school heads gained insights that emphasized the importance of teamwork, transparency, flexibility, and innovation in overcoming limitations and leading effectively during a crisis. The study’s findings contribute to strengthening school leadership and policy formulation in preparation for future disruptions in the education sector.

Keywords : School Heads, Face-To-Face Classes, COVID-19 Transition, Educational Leadership, Qualitative Research, Public Schools.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe