Nexus between Power Imbalance Among Intimate Partners and Gender Based Violence Among Youth in Ruiru Sub-County, Kiambu County, Kenya


Authors : Mirriam Wairimu Kuria; Lilian Chesikaw; Mary Chepchieng

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4swet5h7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdfxmjwu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug174

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The study sought to examine the relationship between power imbalance among intimate partners and gender- based violence (GBV) among the youth in Ruiru Sub-County, Kiambu County, Kenya. The study’s literature includes a review of multiple related literature consistent with the research topic by exploring different perspectives on power imbalance factors contributing to GBV among the youth in different contexts. The study was guided by the Social Learning Theory and complemented by the Social Exchange Theory. The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional study design. The targeted population was 1,166 youths while the accessible population was 664. A sample size of 268 respondents was obtained through a stratified random sampling procedure ensuring that both male and female participants were appropriately represented in the study. Validity of the instruments was determined by experts from the Institute of Gender, Women and Development Studies. The study adhered to ethical considerations in all study processes. Primary data collection was done using interview schedules for 12 respondents and closed-ended questionnaires for 244 respondents totalling to 256. The collected data was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using statistical methods and thematic analysis respectively. The quantitative data was analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 through correlations and regression. The qualitative data was analysed using NVivo through thematic analysis. The study reveals that gender- based violence (GBV) among youth in Ruiru Sub-County is shaped by power imbalance among intimate partners. Quantitative statistics revealed standardised regression coefficient (β=0.418, p=0.014) and a robust correlation (r=0.79, p<0.01), highlighting how disparities in decision-making authority, access and financial control lead to strained relationship dynamics. These findings were supported by qualitative findings illustrating how gender expectations and economic dependency encourage patriarchal dominance. The study concludes that GBV in this peri-urban context is not merely a personal or household issue but a systemic phenomenon that is rooted in power imbalances and institutional fragility. Based on the findings, the study recommends that the County Government of Kiambu in collaboration with national agencies needs to develop and enforce gender-responsive policies promoting inter-agency coordination and resource allocation; civil society Organisations and the private sector expand youth-centred economic empowerment programs including vocational training, microfinance, financial literacy and targeted support for GBV survivors; religious and community leaders partner with youth networks and educational institutions need to lead transformative campaigns challenging gender norms through education, community dialogues and public declarations; also, healthcare and justice sectors need to strengthen their capacity in trauma-informed, survivor-centred care, deploying mobile legal and health clinics to underserved areas to ensure equitable psychosocial, legal and medical services. Future research needs to explore how cultural norms and economic insecurity structurally contribute to GBV among youth, assess the long-term impact of empowerment interventions through longitudinal studies and evaluate the effectiveness of GBV policies in culturally diverse and economically disadvantaged settings.

Keywords : Gender-Based Violence, Power Imbalance, Intimate Partners and Youth Vulnerability.

References :

  1. Abdool Karim, Q., & Baxter, C. (2016). The dual burden of gender-based violence and HIV in adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Global Health, 4(10), e678–e679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30148-3
  2. Ahinkorah, B. O., Dickson, K. S., & Seidu, A. A. (2018). Women decision-making autonomy and intimate partner violence: Analysis of data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Women's Health, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0640-y
  3. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in Organisational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
  4. Benebo, F. O., Schumann, B., & Vaezghasemi, M. (2018). Intimate partner violence against women in Nigeria: A multilevel study investigating the effect of women’s status and community norms. BMC Women's Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0658-1
  5. Bhattacharjee, P., Fulu, E., McCook, S., & Basnyat, I. (2020). Drivers of violence against women: A review of evidence from the Global South. Global Public Health, 15(1), 1–16.
  6. Bradbury-Jones, C., & Isham, L. (2021). The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(7-8), 634–639.
  7. Brown, A., Meinhart, M., Poulton, C., & Stark, L. (2022). Adolescent girls and young women in relationships with older men: A narrative review of risk factors for sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(2), 237–247.
  8. Carlson, C. (2015). The impact of domestic violence on children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(5), 935–956.
  9. Decker, M. R., Latimore, A. D., Yasutake, S., Haviland, M., Ahmed, S., Blum, R. W., & Silverman, J. G. (2015). Gender-based violence against adolescent and young adult women in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 188–196.
  10. Garcia-Moreno, C., Zimmerman, C., Morris-Gehring, A., Heise, L., Amin, A., Abrahams, N., & Watts, C. (2015). Addressing violence against women: A call to action. The Lancet, 385(9978), 1685–1695.
  11. Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62.
  12. Javed, S., & Chattu, V. K. (2021). Strengthening gender-based violence strategies in South Asia. Journal of Global Health, 11, 03038. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.03038
  13. Kato-Wallace, J., Barker, G., Eads, M., & Levtov, R. (2019). Global pathways to gender equality: The role of men and boys. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), S11–S17.
  14. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2022). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2022. Nairobi: KNBS.
  15. Muluneh, M. D., Stulz, V., Francis, L., & Agho, K. (2020). Gender-based violence against women in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030903
  16. National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC). (2022). Status of gender-based violence in Kenya: Policy gaps and recommendations. Nairobi: NGEC.
  17. Olson, R. M., Garcia-Moreno, C., & Colombo, M. (2022). Violence against women and children in Kenya: Prevalence, perpetrators and health outcomes. UNICEF Kenya Country Office Report.
  18. Opondo, A., Mugambi, M., & Mwangi, J. (2023). Psychological consequences of GBV among adolescent girls in Nairobi. African Journal of Mental Health, 15(1), 110–124.
  19. Semahegn, A., Belachew, T., & Abdulahi, M. (2019). Domestic violence and its predictors among married women in Ethiopia. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 1–8.
  20. Shannon, K., Kerr, T., Allinott, S., Chettiar, J., Shoveller, J., & Tyndall, M. W. (2015). Social and structural violence and power relations in the lives of HIV-positive women in Africa. AIDS Care, 27(6), 728–735.
  21. Smith Slep, A. M., Foran, H. M., & Heyman, R. E. (2014). Family violence and its impact across the lifespan: Implications for prevention and intervention. American Psychologist, 69(2), 112–123.
  22. Stark, L. (2007). Power and coercion in intimate partner violence: A feminist perspective. New York: Feminist Press.
  23. Temmerman, M. (2015). Research priorities for ending sexual violence against women. The Lancet, 385(9975), 1567–1569.
  24. UNFPA. (2022). Gender-based violence: A global crisis. United Nations Population Fund. https://www.unfpa.org/gbv
  25. UN Women. (2021). The shadow pandemic: Gender-based violence in the wake of COVID-19. https://www.unwomen.org
  26. UN Women. (2022). Gender equality and women's empowerment in Kenya. https://www.unwomen.org
  27. Wado, Y. D., Afework, M. F., & Hindin, M. J. (2021). Gender norms and intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: A cross-sectional study from Kenya. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 1–10.
  28. Wanjala, A. (2023). Alarming rise in GBV cases reported in Kiambu County. Daily Nation. https://nation.africa
  29. Wenham, C., Smith, J., & Morgan, R. (2020). COVID-19: The gendered impacts of the outbreak. The Lancet, 395(10227), 846–848.
  30. WHO. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
  31. WHO. (2017). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2017. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
  32. WHO. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

The study sought to examine the relationship between power imbalance among intimate partners and gender- based violence (GBV) among the youth in Ruiru Sub-County, Kiambu County, Kenya. The study’s literature includes a review of multiple related literature consistent with the research topic by exploring different perspectives on power imbalance factors contributing to GBV among the youth in different contexts. The study was guided by the Social Learning Theory and complemented by the Social Exchange Theory. The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional study design. The targeted population was 1,166 youths while the accessible population was 664. A sample size of 268 respondents was obtained through a stratified random sampling procedure ensuring that both male and female participants were appropriately represented in the study. Validity of the instruments was determined by experts from the Institute of Gender, Women and Development Studies. The study adhered to ethical considerations in all study processes. Primary data collection was done using interview schedules for 12 respondents and closed-ended questionnaires for 244 respondents totalling to 256. The collected data was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using statistical methods and thematic analysis respectively. The quantitative data was analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 through correlations and regression. The qualitative data was analysed using NVivo through thematic analysis. The study reveals that gender- based violence (GBV) among youth in Ruiru Sub-County is shaped by power imbalance among intimate partners. Quantitative statistics revealed standardised regression coefficient (β=0.418, p=0.014) and a robust correlation (r=0.79, p<0.01), highlighting how disparities in decision-making authority, access and financial control lead to strained relationship dynamics. These findings were supported by qualitative findings illustrating how gender expectations and economic dependency encourage patriarchal dominance. The study concludes that GBV in this peri-urban context is not merely a personal or household issue but a systemic phenomenon that is rooted in power imbalances and institutional fragility. Based on the findings, the study recommends that the County Government of Kiambu in collaboration with national agencies needs to develop and enforce gender-responsive policies promoting inter-agency coordination and resource allocation; civil society Organisations and the private sector expand youth-centred economic empowerment programs including vocational training, microfinance, financial literacy and targeted support for GBV survivors; religious and community leaders partner with youth networks and educational institutions need to lead transformative campaigns challenging gender norms through education, community dialogues and public declarations; also, healthcare and justice sectors need to strengthen their capacity in trauma-informed, survivor-centred care, deploying mobile legal and health clinics to underserved areas to ensure equitable psychosocial, legal and medical services. Future research needs to explore how cultural norms and economic insecurity structurally contribute to GBV among youth, assess the long-term impact of empowerment interventions through longitudinal studies and evaluate the effectiveness of GBV policies in culturally diverse and economically disadvantaged settings.

Keywords : Gender-Based Violence, Power Imbalance, Intimate Partners and Youth Vulnerability.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe