Pain Management Strategies for Jugular Bulb Dehiscence Using Midazolam and Morphine in Resource-Limited Primary Emergency Services: A Case Report and Literature Review


Authors : Dr. Camilo Vidal Araya; Dr. María José Yarí; Dr. Amanda Oraa

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/m7muf7a8

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4r9acm4r

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1257

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Introduction: Jugular bulb dehiscence (JBD) is a rare otologic condition causing severe acute pain that typically requires specialized management. In resource-limited settings, primary emergency services face significant challenges managing such cases without immediate access to tertiary care facilities or otolaryngology specialists.  Objective: To describe a sedoanalgesia protocol using midazolam and morphine for acute pain management in JBD in primary emergency services with limited resources.  Methods: Clinical case of a 32-year-old woman with left JBD confirmed by CT, presenting with sudden hemicrania headache (VAS 9/10) and self-limited ipsilateral otorrhagia. The patient had primary adrenal insufficiency and history of PSVT treated with ablation. A protocol was implemented including hydrocortisone 100 mg IV, midazolam 5 mg IV and morphine 10 mg IV fractionated over 120 minutes, with continuous monitoring. Pain reduction, adverse events, hemodynamic stability, and sedation level were evaluated.  Results: The patient experienced gradual pain reduction (VAS: 9/10 to 2/10) over 120 minutes, without adverse events. Vital signs remained stable (initial HR 108 bpm, final 85 bpm; BP maintained within normal ranges; SpO2 >96%). No episodes of PSVT, hypotension, nausea, or vomiting were recorded. The patient was discharged with deferred referral to otorhinolaryngology.  Discussion: This case demonstrates that complex otologic emergencies can be effectively managed in resource-limited settings with careful patient selection, appropriate monitoring, and standardized protocols. The midazolam-morphine combination provided both anxiolysis and analgesia, addressing the multifactorial nature of pain in JBD.  Conclusions: The midazolam-morphine combination proved effective and safe for acute JBD pain management in emergency settings with limited resources, even in a patient with complex comorbidities. This approach provides a viable alternative when immediate tertiary care is unavailable. Studies with larger samples are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords : Jugular Bulb Dehiscence, Acute Pain, Midazolam, Morphine, Sedoanalgesia, Primary Emergency, Limited Resources.

References :

  1. Friedmann, D. R., Le, B. T., Pramanik, B. K., & Lalwani, A. K. (2010). Clinical spectrum of patients with erosion of the inner ear by jugular bulb abnormalities. Laryngoscope, 120(2), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20699
  2. Tudose, R. C., Rusu, M. C., Triantafyllou, G., Piagkou, M., Toader, C., & Rădoi, P. M. (2024). Anatomical variations of the jugular bulb: A critical and comprehensive review. Medicina, 60(9), 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091408
  3. Vachata, P., Petrovický, P., Sameš, M., Boška, M., Alušík, Š., Tišler, P., & Zolal, A. (2010). An anatomical and radiological study of the high jugular bulb on high-resolution CT scans and alcohol-fixed skulls of adults. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 17(4), 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.07.111
  4. Manjila, S., Bazil, T., Kay, M., Udayasankar, U. K., & Semaan, M. (2018). Jugular bulb and skull base pathologies: Proposal for a novel classification system for jugular bulb positions and microsurgical implications. Neurosurgical Focus, 45(1), E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS18106
  5. Brook, C. D., Buch, K., Kaufmann, M., Sakai, O., & Devaiah, A. K. (2015). The prevalence of high-riding jugular bulb in patients with suspected endolymphatic hydrops. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, 76(6), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555747
  6. Friedmann, D. R., Eubig, J., Winata, L. S., Pramanik, B. K., Merchant, S. N., & Lalwani, A. K. (2012). A clinical and histopathologic study of jugular bulb abnormalities. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 138(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.231
  7. Dai, C., Zhao, P., Ding, H., Lv, H., Qiu, X., Li, X., Xu, N., Meng, X., Wang, G., Xie, J., Yang, Z., Gong, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). CT evaluation of unilateral pulsatile tinnitus with jugular bulb wall dehiscence. European Radiology, 33(6), 4464-4471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09352-8
  8. Guarnizo, A., Mejia, J., & Tórres, O. (2022). High jugular bulb with a diverticulum and vestibular aqueduct dehiscence: An anatomical variant to be aware in patients with hearing loss. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 44, 1041-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02983-y
  9. Mohanty, C. R., Radhakrishnan, R. V., Stephen, S., Jain, M., Shetty, A. P., Issac, A., Shaji, I. M., & Chakola, S. (2022). Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in a tertiary care trauma center in eastern India: A retrospective observational study. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(2), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.342806
  10. Garneau, J. C., Wasserman, I., Konuthula, N., & Malkin, B. D. (2018). Referral patterns from emergency department to otolaryngology clinic. Laryngoscope, 128(5), 1062-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26868
  11. Papadopoulos, N., Prokopakis, E. P., Karatzanis, A. D., Linardakis, M., Mourellou, E., & Symvoulakis, E. K. (2023). Features of ENT cases in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Greece: A prospectively driven data collection study. Healthcare, 11(13), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131943
  12. Schaller, S. J., Alam, S. M., Mao, J., Zhao, Y., Blobner, M., Greenblatt, D. J., & Martyn, J. A. (2017). Pharmacokinetics cannot explain the increased effective dose requirement for morphine and midazolam in rats during their extended administration alone or in combination. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 69(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12663
  13. Peter, J. U., Dieudonné, P., & Zolk, O. (2024). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and side effects of midazolam: A review and case example. Pharmaceuticals, 17(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17040473
  14. Navigante, A. H., Cerchietti, L. C., Castro, M. A., Lutteral, M. A., & Cabalar, M. E. (2006). Midazolam as adjunct therapy to morphine in the alleviation of severe dyspnea perception in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.009
  15. Friedmann, D. R., Eubig, J., McGill, M., Babb, J. S., Pramanik, B. K., & Lalwani, A. K. (2011). Development of the jugular bulb: A radiologic study. Otology & Neurotology, 32(8), 1389-1395. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e5b8d
  16. David, S. N., & Ganesan, P. (2020). Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Current Medical Issues, 18(1), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_63_19
  17. Kern, J., Guinn, A., & Mehta, P. (2022). Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Practice, 24(6), 1-24.
  18. Conway, A., Rolley, J., & Sutherland, J. R. (2016). Midazolam for sedation before procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(5), CD009491. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009491.pub2
  19. Sedación para procedimientos en el servicio de urgencias. (2021). Universitas Medica, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.umed62-1.seda
  20. Upadhyay, S. P., Singh, A. K., Varma, M., Rao, M. B., & Mallick, N. P. (2016). Procedural sedation and analgesia in emergency department: A review and update. Journal of Pain Relief, 5, 270. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000270
  21. Nakamura, T., Sato, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2022). Long-term outcomes of emergency sedoanalgesia for jugular bulb dehiscence. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-022-00489-5
  22. Atmaca, S., Elmali, M., & Kucuk, H. (2014). High and dehiscent jugular bulb: Clear and present danger during middle ear surgery. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 36(4), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1196-z
  23. Beaudoin, F. L., Gutman, R., Merchant, R. C., Clark, M. A., Swor, R. A., Jones, J. S., Lee, D. C., Peak, D. A., Domeier, R. M., Rathlev, N. K., & McLean, S. A. (2017). Persistent pain after motor vehicle collision: Comparative effectiveness of opioids vs nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs prescribed from the emergency department-a propensity matched analysis. Pain, 158(2), 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000756
  24. Motov, S., Yasavolian, M., Likourezos, A., Pushkar, I., Hossain, R., Drapkin, J., Cohen, V., Filk, N., Smith, A., Huang, F., Rockoff, B., Homel, P., & Fromm, C. (2017). Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 70(2), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.014
  25. Vogt, K. M., Ibinson, J. W., Smith, C. T., Citro, A. T., Norton, C. M., Karim, H. T., Popov, V., Mahajan, A., Aizenstein, H. J., Reder, L. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2021). Midazolam and ketamine produce distinct neural changes in memory, pain, and fear networks during pain. Anesthesiology, 135(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003774
  26. McNicol, E., Midbari, A., & Eisenberg, E. (2013). Opioids for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD006146. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006146.pub2
  27. Alimohammadi, H., Baratloo, A., Abdalvand, A., Rouhipour, A., & Safari, S. (2014). Effects of pain relief on arterial blood O₂ saturation. Trauma Monthly, 19(1), e14034. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.14034
  28. Selvaraj, R. J., Dukiya, S., Ananthakrishna Pillai, A., Satheesh, S., & Balachander, J. (2019). Effects of conscious sedation on tachycardia inducibility and patient comfort during ablation of supraventricular tachycardia: A double blind randomized controlled study. Europace, 21(1), 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy146
  29. Kuypers, M. I., Plötz, F. B., & Mencl, F. (2017). Implementation strategies for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0130-2

Introduction: Jugular bulb dehiscence (JBD) is a rare otologic condition causing severe acute pain that typically requires specialized management. In resource-limited settings, primary emergency services face significant challenges managing such cases without immediate access to tertiary care facilities or otolaryngology specialists.  Objective: To describe a sedoanalgesia protocol using midazolam and morphine for acute pain management in JBD in primary emergency services with limited resources.  Methods: Clinical case of a 32-year-old woman with left JBD confirmed by CT, presenting with sudden hemicrania headache (VAS 9/10) and self-limited ipsilateral otorrhagia. The patient had primary adrenal insufficiency and history of PSVT treated with ablation. A protocol was implemented including hydrocortisone 100 mg IV, midazolam 5 mg IV and morphine 10 mg IV fractionated over 120 minutes, with continuous monitoring. Pain reduction, adverse events, hemodynamic stability, and sedation level were evaluated.  Results: The patient experienced gradual pain reduction (VAS: 9/10 to 2/10) over 120 minutes, without adverse events. Vital signs remained stable (initial HR 108 bpm, final 85 bpm; BP maintained within normal ranges; SpO2 >96%). No episodes of PSVT, hypotension, nausea, or vomiting were recorded. The patient was discharged with deferred referral to otorhinolaryngology.  Discussion: This case demonstrates that complex otologic emergencies can be effectively managed in resource-limited settings with careful patient selection, appropriate monitoring, and standardized protocols. The midazolam-morphine combination provided both anxiolysis and analgesia, addressing the multifactorial nature of pain in JBD.  Conclusions: The midazolam-morphine combination proved effective and safe for acute JBD pain management in emergency settings with limited resources, even in a patient with complex comorbidities. This approach provides a viable alternative when immediate tertiary care is unavailable. Studies with larger samples are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords : Jugular Bulb Dehiscence, Acute Pain, Midazolam, Morphine, Sedoanalgesia, Primary Emergency, Limited Resources.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe