Authors : Budhi Ram Chaudhary; Bharat Mandal; Rajan Suwal

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yxatee27

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug1601

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Network arch bridges, first developed by Per Tveit, are recognized for their high structural efficiency due to inclined intersecting hangers that reduce bending moments and enhance stiffness. In order to assess the impact of hanger cross-angles ranging from 25° to 90°, this study offers a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of a 100 m span steel network arch bridge using MIDAS Civil. Using the El Centro earthquake data, the bridge was examined under IRCbased wind loading and nonlinear time-history seismic excitation. To access differences in axial force, bending moment, shear force, and overall structural behaviour, 19 hanger configurations were analysed. The findings demonstrate that dynamic loading controls bridge response, resulting in tie-beam tensile forces close to 430,000 kN and arch compressive forces up to 350,000 kN. While greatly raising hanger strain, increasing hanger cross-angle lowers axial demand in the tie beam and arch rib. While tie-beam axial forces show a high dependency on hanger arrangement, arch bending moments are comparatively resistant to hanger-angle variation. The most balanced structural performance is achieved by hanger cross-angles between 60° and 75°, which combine lower tie-beam tension, less dynamic compression, and a moderate hanger force requirement. The results provide useful recommendations for hanger layout optimization in steel network arch bridges and create the groundwork for further research on hanger loss, robustness evaluation, and structural health monitoring.

Keywords : Network Arch Bridge, Hanger Cross-Angle, Finite Element Analysis, Time History Analysis, Wind Load Analysis, Axial Force Distribution; Structural Stability; Dynamic Response, Structural Optimization.

References :

1. Belevicius, R., Juozapaitis, A., & Rusakevičius, D. (2018). Parameter study on weight minimization of network arch bridges. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 62(1), 48-55.
2. Błonka, A., & Skrętkowicz, Ł. (2022). Nonlinear buckling analysis of network arch bridges. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 44(2), 123-137.
3. Brunn, B., & Schanack, F. (2003). Calculation of a double track railway network arch bridge applying the European standards. Germany: TU-Dresden.
4. Bruno, D., Lonetti, P., & Pascuzzo, A. (2016). An optimization model for the design of network arch bridges. Computers & Structures, 170, 13-25.
5. Bruno, D., Lonetti, P., & Pascuzzo, A. (2018). A numerical study on network arch bridges subjected to cable loss. Int. J. Bridge Eng, 6(2), 1-19.
6. Danciu, A. D., Guțiu, Ș. I., Moga, C., Dragomir, M. L., Ciotlăuș, M., & Marusceac, V. (2023). A review of the network arch bridge. Applied Sciences, 13(19), 10966.
7. De Zotti, A., Pellegrino, C., & Modena, C. (2007). A parametric study of the hanger arrangement in arch bridges. In ARCH'07-5th International Conference on Arch Bridges (pp. 475-482).
8. GARCIA, E. (2009). DESIGN OF NETWORK ARCH BRIDGES.".
9. Islam, N., Rana, S., Ahsan, R., & Ghani, S. N. (2014). An optimized design of network arch bridge using global optimization algorithm. Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(2), 197-210.
10. Järvenpää, E., & Laaksonen, A. (2023, October). Form-finding of constant stress arch in network tied-arch bridge. In International Conference on Arch Bridges (pp. 325-332). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
11. Järvenpää, E., Laaksonen, A. (2025). Form-Finding of Constant Stress Arch in Network Tied-Arch Bridge. In: Briseghella, B., Contento, A., Liu, J. (eds) Proceedings of ARCH 2023. ARCH 2023. Structural Integrity, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83508-7_36
12. Jiang, Z., Xiao, R., Song, C., Sun, B., Tong, S., & Ma, Y. (2024). An analytical method for out-of-plane stability assessment of network arch bridges. Thin-Walled Structures, 204, 112289.
13. Jorquera-Lucerga, J. J., & García-Guerrero, J. M. (2025). Preliminary Design and Parametric Study of Minimum-Weight Steel Tied-Arch Bridges Obtained According to a Maximum Allowable Deflection Criterion. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10022.
14. Lai, Y., Li, Y., Huang, M., Zhao, L., Chen, J., & Xie, Y. M. (2023). Conceptual design of long span steel-UHPC composite network arch bridge. Engineering structures, 277, 115434.
15. Lonetti, P., & Pascuzzo, A. (2020). A practical method for the elastic buckling design of network arch bridges. International Journal of Steel Structures, 20(1), 311-329.
16. Naess, A. (2014). System Reliability Analysis of Slender Network Arch Bridges.
17. Olaszek, P., Świercz, A., Wyczałek, I., & Kołakowski, P. (2025). Monitoring and numerical analyses of the steel railway arch bridge: a case study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 30(1), 05024007.
18. Pettersen, E. F., & Hovde, R. H. (2024). Dynamic Analysis of Network Arch Bridge Subjected to Train Traffic.
19. Rane, P. R. (2024). Analysis of long span steel tied arch bridges. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology.
20. Schanack, F. (2009). In-plane arch buckling of network arch bridges. Paper for the 2009 World Steel Bridge Symposium.
21. Schanack, F., & Brunn, B. (2009). Analysis of the structural performance of network arch bridges. Indian concrete journal, 83(1), 7-13.
22. Selvam, E., Antony, C. B., & Kumar, S. V. (2024). Structural optimization of hangers in network arch bridges. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science, 13(2), 34–44.
23. Tetougeni, C. D., Maiorana, E., Zampieri, P., Pellegrino, C., & Briseghella, B. (2023, October). Structural Integrity of Tied Steel Arch Bridges After Loss Hanger Scenario. In International Conference on Arch Bridges (pp. 218-225). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
24. Tetougueni, C. D., Zampieri, P., & Pellegrino, C. (2019). Lateral structural behaviour of steel network arch bridges. In Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Tematic Conference On Computational Methods In Structural Dynamics And Earthquake Engineering (pp. 5834-5841).
25. Tveit, P. (2014). Systematic thesis on network arches. University of Agder.
26. Whelan, M., Salas Zamudio, N., & Kernicky, T. (2018). Structural identification of a tied arch bridge using parallel genetic algorithms and ambient vibration monitoring with a wireless sensor network. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 8(2), 315-330.
27. Zampieri, P., Tetougueni, C. D., Maiorana, E., & Pellegrino, C. (2021). Post-buckling of network arch bridges subjected to vertical loads. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(7), 941-959.