Parental Perspectives for Educating Students with Deaf-Blindness in Inclusive Settings


Authors : Jhamka Prasad Gautam

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/352zdm7s

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y73c9v9u

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb482

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This master’s thesis investigates the lived experiences of parents of deaf-blind (DB) children in Nepal within the framework of inclusive education. The study examines parental perceptions of the effectiveness of inclusive schooling, the barriers they encounter in accessing quality education, the teaching strategies and support systems they consider essential, and the nature of their collaboration with educators. The research is guided by four main questions and qualitative approach was adopted, employing semi-structured interviews with parents of deaf-blind children enrolled in inclusive schools. Purposive sampling ensured diversity across key dimensions: socio- economic status, geographic location (urban and rural), type of inclusive school (public/private), severity of the child’s deaf-blindness, parental education and advocacy level, and cultural/linguistic background. This diversity allowed the study to capture contextual variations in parental perceptions and experiences across Nepal’s heterogeneous educational landscape. Parents consistently emphasize the importance of multisensory, individualized teaching approaches e.g., tactile communication, Braille, and structured play-based learning and the critical role of trained aides, orientation and mobility services, and family support. Collaboration with educators is often reported as infrequent, superficial, or one- directional, with parents facing challenges related to limited communication channels, language barriers, and lack of recognition of their expertise. Opportunities for meaningful involvement remain underutilized. The study concludes that improving inclusive education for deaf-blind children in Nepal requires targeted teacher professional development, stronger policy implementation, investment in accessible resources, and deliberate mechanisms for authentic parental partnership. These findings contribute to the limited body of knowledge on deaf-blind education in low- and middle-income countries and offer practical recommendations for policymakers, educators, and disability advocacy organizations in Nepal. Findings indicate that while some parents report modest academic and social gains in inclusive settings, many perceive limited effectiveness due to inadequate teacher training in deaf-blind education, lack of DB-specific assistive technologies, and insufficient individualized support. Systemic barriers particularly pronounced in rural areas include limited availability of inclusive schools, poor infrastructure, and weak implementation of national inclusive education policies. Socio-economic constraints and cultural stigma further complicate access and advocacy. Despite these challenges, parents expressed a strong aspiration for their children to be included in mainstream educational settings, not only for academic learning but also for social integration and community belonging. The study highlights the critical role that families play in advocating for inclusive practices and the urgent need for systemic reform in teacher training, policy enforcement, and resource allocation. The findings contribute to the limited but growing body of literature on deaf-blind education in Nepal and underscore the importance of incorporating parental voices in policy dialogue and program development to ensure truly inclusive and equitable education for all.

References :

  1. Aitken, S. (2000). Understanding deaf blindness: Issues, perspectives, and strategies.
  2. SKI-HI Institute.
  3. Aitken, S., Buultjens, M., Clark, C., Eyre, J. T., & Pease, L. (2000). Teaching children          who are deafblind: Contact, communication and learning. David Fulton Publishers.
  4. Alquraini, T., & Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42–59.
  5. Bhandari, R. (2019). Education and disability in Nepal: A critical analysis.
  6. Kathmandu University Press.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
  9. Brown, I., & Brown, R. I. (2004). Quality of life and disability: An approach for community practitioners. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  10. Bruce, S. M., & Parker, A. T. (2012). Young deafblind adults in action: Moving toward independence. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(8), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210600802
  11. Bunch, G. O. (1994). An interpretation of full inclusion. American Institutes for Research.
  12. Burman, E. (2017). Deconstructing developmental psychology (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  13. Cologon, K. (2013). Inclusive education in the early years: Right from the start.
  14. Oxford University Press.
  15. Dammeyer, J. (2010). Psychosocial development in a Danish population of children with cochlear implants and deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp024
  16. DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (1994). Moral classrooms, moral children: Creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education. Teachers College Press.
  17. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family- centered helpgiving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20176
  18. Falkmer, M., Anderson, K., Joosten, A., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Parents’ perspectives on inclusive schools for children with autism spectrum conditions.
  19. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.886195
  20. Foreman, P. (2011). Inclusion in action (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
  21. Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2018). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (8th ed.). Pearson.
  22. Gargiulo, R. M., & Kilgo, J. L. (2014). An introduction to young children with special needs: Birth through age eight (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  23. Giangreco, M. F., & Doyle, M. B. (2007). Quick-guides to inclusion: Ideas for educating students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  24. Government of Nepal. (2017). Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2017. Ministry of Women, Children and Senior Citizens.
  25. Government of Nepal. (2022). School Sector Development Plan (2022–2030).
  26. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  27. Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2018). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (14th ed.). Pearson.
  28. Harry, B. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400306
  29. Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M. J., & McIntyre, D. (2004). Learning without limits. Open University Press.
  30. Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Pearson.
  31. Hornby, G. (2014). Inclusive special education: Evidence-based practices for children with special needs and disabilities. Springer.
  32. Huefner, D. S. (2000). Getting comfortable with special education law: A framework for working with children with disabilities. Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
  33. Hyde, M., & Power, D. (2006). Some ethical considerations in the education of deafblind children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj019
  34. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. U.S. Department of Education.
  35. Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S. R. (2007). Disability in local and global worlds. University of California Press.
  36. Janssen, M., & Rodbroe, I. (2007). Communication and congenital deafblindness: The development of meaning-making and communication. VCDBF.
  37. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Pearson.
  38. Lamichhane, K. (2015). Disability, education and employment in developing countries: From charity to human rights. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Luckner, J. L., & Carter, K. (2001). Essential competencies for teaching students with hearing loss and additional disabilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 146(1), 7–15.
  40. McInnes, J. M. (1999). A guide to planning and support for individuals who are deafblind. University of Toronto Press.
  41. McLinden, M., & McCall, S. (2002). Learning through touch: Supporting children with visual impairments and additional difficulties. David Fulton Publishers.
  42. Miles, S., & McLennan, A. (2016). Inclusive education for children with disabilities in low-income countries. Disability & Society, 31(4), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1182010
  43. Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  44. National Federation of the Deaf Nepal. (2018). Status of deaf education in Nepal.
  45. Kathmandu: NFDN.
  46. Odom, S. L., Vitztum, J., Wolery, R., Lieber, J., Sandall, S., Hanson, M. J., Beckman, P., Schwartz, I., & Horn, E. (2004). Preschool inclusion: A review of research from an ecological systems perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 3802.2004.00016.x
  47. Parker, A. T., McGinnity, B., & Bruce, S. M. (2011). Educational programming for individuals who are deafblind: Position paper. Perkins School for the Blind.
  48. Pijl, S. J., & Meijer, C. J. W. (1997). Inclusive education: A global agenda.
  49. Routledge.
  50. Regmi, N. P. (2020). Inclusive education in Nepal: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Education and Research, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v10i1.31860
  51. Rieser, R. (2012). Implementing inclusive education: A Commonwealth guide to implementing Article 24 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2nd ed.). Commonwealth Secretariat.
  52. Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2004). Encouraging voices: Respecting the insights of young people who have been marginalised. Support for Learning, 19(4), 155–161.
  53. Salend, S. J. (2016). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (8th ed.). Pearson.
  54. Sauer, J. S., & Jorgensen, C. M. (2016). Including students with significant disabilities in the general education classroom. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  55. Sharma, U., & Desai, I. (2002). Measuring concerns about integrated education in India. Asia and Pacific Journal on Disability, 5(1), 2–14.
  56. Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
  57. Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  58. Singal, N. (2006). An ecosystemic approach for understanding inclusive education: An Indian case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(3), 239–252.
  59. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education.
  60. Routledge.
  61. Smith, D. D., Robb, S. M., West, J., & Tyler, N. C. (2010). The changing education landscape: How special education leadership preparation can make a difference. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 25–43.
  62. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
  63. Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Erwin, E. J., Soodak, L. C., & Shogren, K. A. (2015).
  64. Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Pearson.
  65. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO.
  66. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations.
  67. Valle, J. W., & Connor, D. J. (2011). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. McGraw-Hill.
  68. Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (2017). Leading an inclusive school: Access and success for all students. ASCD.
  69. Wehmeyer, M. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
  70. Westwood, P. (2013). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge.
  71. Winzer, M. A., & Mazurek, K. (2010). Special education in the 21st century: Issues of inclusion and reform. Gallaudet University Press.
  72. Wolery, M., & Wilbers, J. S. (1994). Including children with special needs in early childhood programs. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  73. World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. WHO.
  74. Yssel, N., Engelbrecht, P., Oswald, M. M., Eloff, I., & Swart, E. (2007). Views of inclusion: A comparative study of parents’ perceptions in South Africa and the United States. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 56–65.
  75. Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. M. (1995). Inclusive education: An evaluation of policy and practice. Phi Delta Kappan.

This master’s thesis investigates the lived experiences of parents of deaf-blind (DB) children in Nepal within the framework of inclusive education. The study examines parental perceptions of the effectiveness of inclusive schooling, the barriers they encounter in accessing quality education, the teaching strategies and support systems they consider essential, and the nature of their collaboration with educators. The research is guided by four main questions and qualitative approach was adopted, employing semi-structured interviews with parents of deaf-blind children enrolled in inclusive schools. Purposive sampling ensured diversity across key dimensions: socio- economic status, geographic location (urban and rural), type of inclusive school (public/private), severity of the child’s deaf-blindness, parental education and advocacy level, and cultural/linguistic background. This diversity allowed the study to capture contextual variations in parental perceptions and experiences across Nepal’s heterogeneous educational landscape. Parents consistently emphasize the importance of multisensory, individualized teaching approaches e.g., tactile communication, Braille, and structured play-based learning and the critical role of trained aides, orientation and mobility services, and family support. Collaboration with educators is often reported as infrequent, superficial, or one- directional, with parents facing challenges related to limited communication channels, language barriers, and lack of recognition of their expertise. Opportunities for meaningful involvement remain underutilized. The study concludes that improving inclusive education for deaf-blind children in Nepal requires targeted teacher professional development, stronger policy implementation, investment in accessible resources, and deliberate mechanisms for authentic parental partnership. These findings contribute to the limited body of knowledge on deaf-blind education in low- and middle-income countries and offer practical recommendations for policymakers, educators, and disability advocacy organizations in Nepal. Findings indicate that while some parents report modest academic and social gains in inclusive settings, many perceive limited effectiveness due to inadequate teacher training in deaf-blind education, lack of DB-specific assistive technologies, and insufficient individualized support. Systemic barriers particularly pronounced in rural areas include limited availability of inclusive schools, poor infrastructure, and weak implementation of national inclusive education policies. Socio-economic constraints and cultural stigma further complicate access and advocacy. Despite these challenges, parents expressed a strong aspiration for their children to be included in mainstream educational settings, not only for academic learning but also for social integration and community belonging. The study highlights the critical role that families play in advocating for inclusive practices and the urgent need for systemic reform in teacher training, policy enforcement, and resource allocation. The findings contribute to the limited but growing body of literature on deaf-blind education in Nepal and underscore the importance of incorporating parental voices in policy dialogue and program development to ensure truly inclusive and equitable education for all.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe