⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Participative Decision-Making, Self-Leadership and Creative Performance Behaviors: Extending Behavioral Self-Management Theory


Authors : Dr. Seçil Taştan

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3jtprfbr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4n8b6s5n

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1345

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study investigates the influence of participative decision-making on employees’ creative performance behaviors and examines the moderating role of self-leadership. The theoretical framework of the study is grounded in organizational behavior theories, particularly Behavioral Self-Management Theory. The sample consisted of employees working in various private-sector organizations in Türkiye. A total of 394 questionnaires were collected through a structured survey, and structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS was employed to test the proposed research model. The findings revealed that participative decision-making positively and significantly contributes to employees’ creative performance behaviors. Furthermore, self-leadership was found to significantly moderate the relationship between participative decision-making and creative performance behaviors. Specifically, the positive effect of participative decisionmaking on creative performance behaviors was stronger among employees with higher levels of self-leadership. These findings suggest that employees perceive participation in decision-making as an important mechanism for enhancing their creative effectiveness, while self-leadership further strengthens this positive influence. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the joint importance of participative managerial practices and individual self-regulatory capabilities in fostering workplace creativity. Based on primary data collected from Turkish employees, the study is among the pioneering studies examining the moderating role of self-leadership in the relationship between participative decision-making and creative performance behaviors.

Keywords : Employee Participation, Participative Decision-Making, Self-Leadership, Creative Performance Behaviors, Behavioral Self-Management Theory.

References :

  1. Abid, G., Arya, B., Arshad, A., Ahmed, S., & Farooqi, S. (2021). Positive personality traits and self-leadership in sustainable organizations: Mediating influence of thriving and moderating role of proactive personality. Sustainable Production and Consumption25, 299-311.
  2. Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology7(2), 201-211.
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity, 87. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  5. Amara, D. B., & Chen, H. (2020). The impact of participative decision-making on eco-innovation capability: the mediating role of motivational eco-innovation factors. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 6966-6986.
  6. Andressen, P., & Konradt, U. (2007). Measuring self-leadership: Psychometric test of the German version of the Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Personal Psychology,6(3), 117-128.
  7. Asurakkody, T. A., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Effects of knowledge sharing behavior on innovative work behavior among nursing Students: Mediating role of Self-leadership. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences12, 100-119.
  8. Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management17(3), 571-587.
  9. Bailey, S. F., Barber, L. K., & Justice, L. M. (2018). Is self-leadership just self-regulation? Exploring construct validity with HEXACO and self-regulatory traits. Current Psychology37(1), 149-161.
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology4(3), 359-373.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
  11. Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry13(3), 195-199.
  12. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
  13. Bass, B. M., & Shackleton, V. J. (1979). Industrial democracy and participative management: A case for a synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 393-404.
  14. Bennet, A., & Bennet, D. (2004). Organizational survival in the new world. U.K.; Routledge.
  15. Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1997). Participative decision-making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 50(7), 859-878.
  16. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior in school: how does it relate to participation in decision making?. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 420-438.
  17. Bouwmans, M., Runhaar, P., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Fostering teachers' team learning: An interplay between transformational leadership and participative decision-making?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 71-80.
  18. Carbonell, P., & Rodriguez-Escudero, A. I. (2013). Management control, role expectations and job satisfaction of new product development teams: The moderating effect of participative decision-making. Industrial Marketing Management42(2), 248-259.
  19. Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Reiter‐Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem‐solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 95-121.
  20. Carver, C. S., & Scheler, M. F. (1983). A control-theory approach to human behavior, and implications for problems in self-management. New York: Academic Press.
  21. Chandler, G. N., Keller, C., & Lyon, D. W. (2000). Unraveling the determinants and consequences of an innovation-supportive organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1), 59-76.
  22. Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. P. (2014). Team control mode, workers' creativity, and new product innovativeness. R&D Management, 44(2), 124-136.
  23. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
  24. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review13(3), 471-482.
  25. Connor, P. E. (1992). Decision-making participation patterns: The role of organizational context. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 218-232.
  26. Corazza, G. E., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Potential in creativity: individual, social, material perspectives, and a dynamic integrative framework. Creativity Research Journal32(1), 81-91.
  27. Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. U.K.:Sage Publications, Inc.
  28. Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review13(1), 8-22.
  29. De Stobbeleir, K. E., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811-831.
  30. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134.
  31. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Intrinsic motivation. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-2.
  32. Foss, L., Woll, K., & Moilanen, M. (2013). Creativity and implementations of new ideas: Do organisational structure, work environment and gender matter?. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 298-322.
  33. Ghosh, K. (2015). Developing organizational creativity and innovation: toward a model of self-leadership, employee creativity, creativity climate and workplace innovative orientation. Management Research Review, 38(11), 1126-1148.
  34. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
  35. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. U.S.A.: Uppersaddle River.
  36. Hauschildt, K., & Konradt, U. (2012). Self‐leadership and team members' work role performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 497-517.
  37. Hill-Briggs, F. (2003). Problem solving in diabetes self-management: a model of chronic illness self-management behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine25(3), 182-193.
  38. Hinton, B. L. (1970). Personality variables and creative potential. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 4(3), 210-217.
  39. Horng, J. S., Tsai, C. Y., Yang, T. C., & Liu, C. H. (2016). Exploring the relationship between proactive personality, work environment and employee creativity among tourism and hospitality employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management54, 25-34.
  40. Houghton, J. D., & Jinkerson, D. L. (2007). Constructive thought strategies and job satisfaction: A preliminary examination. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(1), 45-53.
  41. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self‐leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self‐leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.
  42. Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies11(4), 65-83.
  43. Irawanto, D. W. (2015). Employee participation in decision-making: Evidence from a state-owned enterprise in Indonesia. Management-Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 20(1), 159-172.
  44. Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., & Lee, D. R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity. Creativity Research Journal22(1), 37-45.
  45. Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment16(4), 343-364.
  46. Knoop, R. (1991). Achievement of work values and participative decision-making. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 775-781.
  47. Konradt, U., Andreßen, P., & Ellwart, T. (2009). Self-leadership in organizational teams: A multilevel analysis of moderators and mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology18(3), 322-346.
  48. Kundu, S. C., & Lata, K. (2017). Effects of supportive work environment on employee retention:  Mediating role of organizational engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(4), 703-722.
  49. Kwon, B., Farndale, E., & Park, J. G. (2016). Employee voice and work engagement: Macro, meso, and micro-level drivers of convergence?. Human Resource Management Review, 26(4), 327-337.
  50. Lammers, C.J., & Szell, G. (1989) International handbook of participation in organizations. U.K.:  Oxford University Press.
  51. Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C., & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior15(1), 49-63.
  52. Lee, C. S., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2007). Effects of transformational leadership and self-leadership on innovative behaviors: Mediating roles of empowerment. International Area Review10(2), 163-176.
  53. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision-making: One more look. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(10), 265-39.
  54. Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review5(3), 361-367.
  55. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2001). The new superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. Germany: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  56. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review11(3), 585-600.
  57. Neck, C. P., Nouri, H., & Godwin, J. L. (2003). How self-leadership affects the goal-setting process. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 691-707.
  58. Neck, C. P., Houghton, J. D., & Manz, C. C. (2024). Self-leadership: The definitive guide to personal excellence (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  59. Niehoff, B. P., Enz, C. A., & Grover, R. A. (1990). The impact of top-management actions on employee attitudes and perceptions. Group & Organization Studies, 15(3), 337-352.
  60. Norris, P. (2008). Driving democracy. Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29-50.
  61. Odoardi, C., Montani, F., Boudrias, J. S., & Battistelli, A. (2015). Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior:  The role of group and psychological processes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 7(4), 1-24.
  62. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal39(3), 607-634.
  63. Pan, W., Sun, L. Y., & Lam, L. W. (2020). Employee–organization exchange and employee creativity: a motivational perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management31(3), 385-407.
  64. Sagie, A. (1994). Participative decision making and performance: A moderator analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(2), 227–246.
  65. Siegel, A. L., & Ruh, R. A. (1973). Job involvement, participation in decision making, personal background and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance9(2), 318-327.
  66. Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management39(3), 684-708.
  67. Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and employee's strain: Examining the buffering effects of leader support and participation in decision-making. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology22(2), 138-149.
  68. Song, J., Wu, J., & Gu, J. (2017). Voice behavior and creative performance moderated by stressors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 177-192.
  69. Sosik, J. J., & Dinger, S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. The Leadership Quarterly18(2), 134-153.
  70. Steinbauer, R., Renn, R. W., Chen, H. S., & Rhew, N. (2018). Workplace ostracism, self-regulation, and job performance: Moderating role of intrinsic work motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology158(6), 767-783.
  71. Stashevsky, S., Burke, R., Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self‐leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90.
  72. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal43(2), 135-148.
  73. Strauss, G. (2006). Worker participation—some under‐considered issues. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society45(4), 778-803.
  74. Sukirno, D. S., & Siengthai, S. (2011). Does participative decision making affect lecturer performance in higher education?. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(5), 494-508.
  75. Sun, L. Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly23(1), 55-65.
  76. Tan, C. L., & Chang, Y. P. (2015). Does Organizational Learning Affect R&D Engineers' Creativity?. Asian Social Science11(16), 137-152.
  77. Taştan, S. B. (2016). Psychological capital: A positive psychological resource and its relationship with creative performance behavior. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 101-118.
  78. Taştan, S. B. (2013). The influences of participative organizational climate and self-leadership on innovative behavior and the roles of job involvement and proactive personality: A survey in the context of SMEs in Izmir. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences75, 407-419.
  79. Thompson, M. A., & Kahnweiler, W. M. (2002). An exploratory investigation of learning culture theory and employee participation in decision making. Human Resource Development Quarterly13(3), 271-288.
  80. Tjosvold, D. (1982). Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology67(2), 189-205.
  81. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review38(4), 8-29.
  82. Utterback, J. M. (1994). Radical innovation and corporate regeneration. Research Technology Management37(4), 10-25.
  83. Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Creativity and empowerment: a complementary relationship. Review of Business12(2), 13-30.
  84. Wong, Y. Y., Chow, I. H. S., Lau, V. P., & Gong, Y. (2018). Benefits of team participative decision making and its potential to affect individual creativity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology48(7), 369-376.
  85. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., & Griffin, R.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
  86. Yu, M. C., Mai, Q., Tsai, S. B., & Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability10(3), 864-885.
  87. Yusliza, M. Y., Faezah, J. N., Noor, N. M. M., Ramayah, T., Tanveer, M. I., & Fawehinmi, O. (2020). Effects of supportive work environment on employee retention: The mediating role of person–organisation fit. Industrial and Commercial Training, 11(4), 53-73.
  88. Zhang, M., & Geng, R. (2019). Empowerment in service recovery: the role of self-regulation process of frontline employee. Management Decision, 58(5), 828-843.
  89. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal44(4), 682-696.
  90. Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology88(3), 413-435.
  91. Zhou, Y., Fan, X., & Son, J. (2019). How and when matter: Exploring the interaction effects of high‐performance work systems, employee participation, and human capital on organizational innovation. Human Resource Management58(3), 253-268.
  92. Zuheros, C., Martínez-Cámara, E., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2022). Crowd decision making: Sparse representation guided by sentiment analysis for leveraging the wisdom of the crowd. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems53(1), 369-379.
  93. Zuheros, C., Martínez-Cámara, E., Herrera-Viedma, E., Katib, I. A., & Herrera, F. (2023). Explainable Crowd Decision Making methodology guided by expert natural language opinions based on Sentiment Analysis with Attention-based Deep Learning and Subgroup Discovery. Information Fusion97, 1-11.

This study investigates the influence of participative decision-making on employees’ creative performance behaviors and examines the moderating role of self-leadership. The theoretical framework of the study is grounded in organizational behavior theories, particularly Behavioral Self-Management Theory. The sample consisted of employees working in various private-sector organizations in Türkiye. A total of 394 questionnaires were collected through a structured survey, and structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS was employed to test the proposed research model. The findings revealed that participative decision-making positively and significantly contributes to employees’ creative performance behaviors. Furthermore, self-leadership was found to significantly moderate the relationship between participative decision-making and creative performance behaviors. Specifically, the positive effect of participative decisionmaking on creative performance behaviors was stronger among employees with higher levels of self-leadership. These findings suggest that employees perceive participation in decision-making as an important mechanism for enhancing their creative effectiveness, while self-leadership further strengthens this positive influence. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the joint importance of participative managerial practices and individual self-regulatory capabilities in fostering workplace creativity. Based on primary data collected from Turkish employees, the study is among the pioneering studies examining the moderating role of self-leadership in the relationship between participative decision-making and creative performance behaviors.

Keywords : Employee Participation, Participative Decision-Making, Self-Leadership, Creative Performance Behaviors, Behavioral Self-Management Theory.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe