Patient Specific Implants


Authors : Dr. Swamini Wath; Dr. Devashish Dipake; Dr. Kedar Kawsankar; Dr. Deepak Motwani; Dr. Vaishali Tile; Dr. Shrishti Salunke; Dr. Anuja Deshpande

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2afmhvj5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2s42ubks

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14854488


Abstract : Three-dimensional (3D) virtual surgical planning, the creation of anatomical models, and the development of patient-specific implants (PSI) have become well-recognized methodologies within the realm of surgery. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is increasingly utilized, particularly in reconstructive procedures, as a dependable substitute for other alloplastic materials in the production of PSI. The application of computer-engineered PSI facilitates more precise reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, mitigating the common complications associated with traditional preformed implants and leading to enhanced patient satisfaction.

Keywords : Implants, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Reconstruction, 3-Dimensional.

References :

  1. J. Parthasarathy, “3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery,” Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2014.
  2. M. Mohammed, I. Gibson, S. K. Malyala, and A. P. Fitzpatrick, “Customised design and development of patient specifc 3D printed whole mandible implant,” in SFF Symp: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 1708–1717, Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas, Austin, Tex, USA, 2016.
  3. F. Rengier, A. Mehndiratta, H. von Tengg-Kobligk et al., “3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications,” International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 335–341, 2010.
  4. M. P. Chae, W. M. Rozen, P. G. McMenamin, M. W. Findlay, R. T. Spychal, and D. J. Hunter-Smith, “Emerging applications of bedside 3d printing in plastic surgery,” Frontiers in Surgery, vol. 2, p. 25, 2015.
  5. Agiz, A., Dogru, S.C., Üzel, M., Kocaelli, H., Arslan, Y.Z., Cansiz, E. (2021). Design of Patient-Specific Maxillofacial Implants and Guides. In: Sharma, N.R., Subburaj, K., Sandhu, K., Sharma, V. (eds)  4 Applications of 3D printing in Biomedical Engineering . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6888-0_5
  6. Binder WJ, Kaye A (1994) Reconstruction of posttraumatic and congenital facial deformities with three-dimensional computer-assisted custom designed implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(6):775–785
  7. Järvinen S, Suojanen J, Kormi E, Wilkman T, Kiukkonen A, Leikola J, Stoor P (2019) The use of patient specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 47(7):1072–1076
  8. Kurtz SM (2012) An overview of PEEK biomaterials. In: PEEK biomaterials handbook. William Andrew Publishing:1
  9. Nieminen T, Kallela I, Wuolijoki E, Kainulainen H, Hiidenheimo I, Rantala I (2008) Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year follow-up. J Biomed Mater Res A 84(2):377–383
  10. Scolozzi P (2012) Maxillofacial reconstruction using polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants by “mirroring” computational planning. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(3):660–665
  11. Alonso-Rodriguez E, Cebrián JL, Nieto MJ, Del Castillo JL, Hernández- Godoy J, Burgueño M (2015) Polyetheretherketone custom-made implants for craniofacial defects: report of 14 cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(7):1232–1238
  12. Rosenthal G, Ng I, Moscovici S, Lee KK, Lay T, Martin C, Manley GT (2014) Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience. Neurosurgery 75(5):523–529
  13. Kim MM, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ (2009) Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11(1):53–57
  14. Owusu JA, Boahene K (2015) Update of patient-specific maxillofacial implant. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 23(4):261–264
  15. Rakesh Koppunur,Kiran Kumar Dama et al ( 2022 ) Design and Fabrication of Patient-Specific Implant for Maxillofacial Surgery Using Additive Manufacturing.
  16. Alasseri N, Alasraj A. Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2020 Dec;42(1):15.

Three-dimensional (3D) virtual surgical planning, the creation of anatomical models, and the development of patient-specific implants (PSI) have become well-recognized methodologies within the realm of surgery. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is increasingly utilized, particularly in reconstructive procedures, as a dependable substitute for other alloplastic materials in the production of PSI. The application of computer-engineered PSI facilitates more precise reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, mitigating the common complications associated with traditional preformed implants and leading to enhanced patient satisfaction.

Keywords : Implants, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Reconstruction, 3-Dimensional.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe