Authors : Mujittaba Bature; Abubakar Bello Lawal; Tanimu Lawal

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4ycvvnxh

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/sf5n5xca

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul188

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The increasing demand for secure communication over public networks has intensified research on information hiding techniques capable of protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access. Image steganography achieves this objective by concealing secret information within digital images while preserving the visual appearance of the cover image. Among the numerous image steganographic techniques, the Least Significant Bit (LSB) method is widely adopted because of its simplicity, high embedding capacity, and low computational complexity. However, its sequential embedding mechanism makes it susceptible to steganalysis and statistical attacks. To address this limitation, pseudorandom embedding techniques distribute secret information randomly throughout the cover image using a shared secret key, thereby improving security and imperceptibility. This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of the LSB and Pseudorandom Encoding techniques for secure image steganography. Both techniques were implemented in MATLAB using identical cover images and secret messages to ensure an unbiased evaluation. Performance was assessed using Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Square Error (MSE), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), embedding capacity, and visual image quality. Experimental results demonstrate that although both techniques effectively conceal secret information with negligible perceptual degradation, the Pseudorandom Encoding technique consistently produces higher PSNR values and lower distortion than the conventional LSB method. Furthermore, the random distribution of embedded data significantly improves resistance to unauthorized detection while maintaining comparable embedding capacity. The findings confirm that pseudorandom embedding provides a more secure and robust alternative to sequential LSB steganography for digital image information hiding.

Keywords : Image Steganography, Least Significant Bit (LSB), Pseudorandom Encoding, Information Hiding, MATLAB, PSNR, MSE, SNR, Image Security.

References :

1. A. Cheddad, J. Condell, K. Curran, and P. McKevitt, "Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods," Signal Processing, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 727–752, 2010.
2. N. F. Johnson and S. Jajodia, "Exploring steganography: Seeing the unseen," Computer, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 26–34, 1998.
3. K. M. Hamid, A. M. Yahya, R. B. Ahmad, and O. M. Al-Qershi, "Image steganography techniques: An overview," International Journal of Computer Science and Security, 2012.
4. F. A. P. Petitcolas, R. J. Anderson, and M. G. Kuhn, "Information hiding—A survey," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1062–1078, 1999.
5. T. Morkel, J. H. P. Eloff, and M. S. Olivier, "An overview of image steganography," Information and Computer Security Architecture Research Group, 2005.
6. M. Juneja and P. S. Sandhu, "An improved LSB image steganography technique," International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013.
7. I. J. Cox, M. L. Miller, J. A. Bloom, J. Fridrich, and T. Kalker, Digital Watermarking and Steganography, 2nd ed. Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.
8. S. Katzenbeisser and F. A. P. Petitcolas, Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking. Boston, MA, USA: Artech House, 2000.
9. C. K. Chan and L. M. Cheng, "Hiding data in images by simple LSB substitution," Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 469–474, 2004.
10. W. Luo, F. Huang, and J. Huang, "Edge adaptive image steganography based on LSB matching revisited," IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 201–214, 2010.
11. X. Zhang, S. Wang, and Y. Liu, "Recent advances in image steganography: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 2, 2024.
12. M. Hussain, A. Khan, and S. Mahmood, "Randomization strategies in image steganography techniques: A review," Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 80, no. 2, 2024.
13. A. Alghamdi and M. Hussain, "Deep learning-based image steganography: Recent advances and challenges," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 252, 2024.
14. Y. Wang, Z. Li, and H. Chen, "Adaptive image steganography based on hybrid embedding," Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 74, 2023.
15. S. Roy and P. Das, "Machine learning techniques for secure image steganography: A comprehensive review," Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, 2024.
16. H. Zhang et al., "A review of modern image steganography and steganalysis," Information Sciences, vol. 654, 2024.
17. M. A. Rahman, M. Islam, and S. Hossain, "Hybrid LSB-DWT image steganography for secure communication," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 110234–110249, 2023.
18. N. Sharma and R. Gupta, "Performance evaluation of adaptive image steganography algorithms," IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024.
19. K. Patel and A. Mehta, "Secure randomized image steganography using adaptive pixel selection," Signal Processing, vol. 221, 2024.
20. L. Chen, J. Zhao, and X. Wu, "Lightweight deep image steganography for secure multimedia communication," IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, 2024.